Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Profile image of Marwa Kh

Good governance is a polymorphous concept that stems from economic and political science. It is used both in the context of the management of public action and in a strategic perspective of economic development. In this article, we are first interested in deconstructing the various contributions to define and reaffirm the role of "good governance" in development strategies. What is "good governance"? How does it have an impact on a country's economy? This paper addresses the issue of causality between good governance and economic development, by examining the inter-connections between economic development and governance indicators to increase transparency and efficiency. The purpose of this article is to organize a systematic literature review in a scientific manner from data collection, through data selection, reading and finally data analysis. The impact of good Governance in economic development differs in political system structure, governance current characteristics and contextual factors. Although outcome factors are influenced by contextual determinants, the governance characteristics are of great importance.

Related Papers

Smita Lahkar

Governance is defined as the exercise of economic, political and administrative authority to manage a country’s affairs at all levels. It comprises mechanisms, processes and institutions, through which citizens and groups articulate their interests, exercise their legal rights meet their obligations and mediate their differences. Thus, governance can be summed up as a process through which authority in a country is exercised (UNDP, 1997; UNESCO, 2012). Development linked governance has been an issue much debated about in the contemporary world. Since the second half of the 1980’s, growth and development studies have started to shed light on the importance of improving institutions of governance on economic growth. Good institutions, good governance and good leadership are considered by many authors as necessary conditions to support the development effort of a country or region. Good governance is believed to be the single most important factor in eradicating poverty and promoting d...

literature review on economic development pdf

Rachel Gisselquist

Mike Omilusi

This study explores the conceptual interface between democracy, development and good governance. It also examines the symbiosis between the three concepts, from theoretical perspective and the praxis. The paper historicizes and traces the emergence of good governance as a concept and universally acceptable principle and its use in international development literature to situate how public institutions ought to or should conduct public affairs and manage public resources, particularly within the frameworks of corporate, international, national and local administration or organizations, and the civil society. The study examines the relationship between democracy, good governance and development in Nigeria and blames the slow pace or the state of development in the country, not on lack of resources, but on the absence of good governance, transparency and accountability. It also identifies pervasive corruption and weakness of institutions of the Nigerian state which individuals manipula...

Research and Analysis Journal

Imrana A Buba

This paper revisits the main arguments on the role of ̳good governance‘ in facilitating economic development. It observes that there are some examples in which neoliberal ̳good governance‘ played a role in facilitating economic development but there are many other examples in which countries attained some level of economic development with governance institutions that were bereft of much 'good governance‘ elements. Thus, it concludes that 'good governance‘ is not an essential pre-requisite for development but it might play some role in facilitating development. The paper argues against the dominant 'one-size-fits-all‘ approach to good governance and support 'good enough governance‘, that encourage reforms to be questioned, prioritised, and made relevant to the conditions of individual countries.

Yönetim ve ekonomi araştırmaları dergisi

NURTEN DERİCİ

International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews

Thelma C H A N S A Chanda , zohaib hassan

Overview: Good governance is essential for national development, serving as a fundamental pillar that supports economic growth, social progress, and sustainable development. It involves the implementation of policies that promote inclusiveness, the rule of law, and participatory decision-making processes. Body of Knowledge: Inclusive governance ensures that all segments of society, including marginalized groups, have a voice in decision-making processes, promoting social equity and reducing disparities. Moreover, good governance creates the foundation for robust economic development, social harmony, and enhanced quality of life, driving a nation towards comprehensive progress. Methods: The study adopted a mixed methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative data. The study was conducted in Lusaka district, the capital city of Zambia at 6 institutions; 3 belonging to government and 3 under private sector. The target population was 1000, with a sample size of 100; involving government officials and administrators, members from Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and the general citizens. Interviews and questionnaires were used to collect data. The study used descriptive analysis to analyze the data. Results: Effective governance promotes efficient public service delivery, reduces corruption, and enhances the equitable distribution of resources, enabling a conducive environment for businesses and investments. Additionally, good governance supports the creation of robust legal and institutional frameworks that uphold human rights and justice, contributing to a secure and predictable socio-political landscape.

Kashif Hussain

Economic governance has been the foundation of the economic development and growth. Impact of good governance and role of institutions in the process of economic growth and development required for governance have been crucial to investigate due to lack of theories to incorporate the role of good governance in the process of economic growth and institutional reforms. The status of economic growth is dependent on the capacity of institutions, especially in case of an economic structure where state has major role in market and formulating the macroeconomic policies. Good Governance demands participation of all the actors and most of the time public institutions' role and their participation in understanding potential in economic development visa -vis in dynamic global arena is not deliberated. Moreover, economic development is mutually contributed by both public and private institutions. Scrutiny of the good governance principles and political economy of the public sector institutions, it emerges that economic governance depends on the institutional capacity building aliened with more realistic good governance principles. This practice eventually leads towards alleviating internal inefficiency and objective progress eventually reflected by the socioeconomic growth and development at large. This paper analyses the dimension of good governance with historical context to Pakistan and proposes short term and long term measures for economic and governance reforms in Pakistan

Soe Thie Nu Htwe

European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research

Since the 1990s the concept ‘good governance’ has become one of the most widely used in debates in development, public policy and international relations. Despite its recent prominence the concept ‘good governance’ has frequently used in different meanings and implications. Following an introduction, which includes a historiographic note on development discourse, the first part of this paper is intended to be an overview of diverse definitions, interpretations and measuring problems of good governance. The purport of the second part of this paper is to focus on whether good governance matters in development or not, the performance of good governance in Albania. This paper has argued that good governance is indispensable in Albania, because misgovernance is a great hindrance and predicament to development. The politicization of bureaucracy, judiciary, appointment, transfer and promotion in all most all offices, lack of voice and accountability, inefficiency and satisfying the vested ...

Joseph Owigo

No matter how good the governance of the certain county is. It still boils down to the presence of the strong leaders and well evolved people to use good governance as a tool for the development, if the country will lack these two aspects, good governance is good as dead to them because it will not do any good more than destruction, corruption and development of under development.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Tariku Nigussie

International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues

Husam-Aldin Al-Malkawi

Mushtaq Khan

Jean-Jacques Dethier

Ilija Stojanovic, Ph.D., PMP

SSRN Electronic Journal

Juzhong Zhuang

Abdullahi Ahmed ciroobe

World Development

Jeffrey Nugent

Ahmet KESER

Paper delivered at a Seminar on Governance for …

Prima Naomi

Raymond Hopkins

Handbook of Development Economics

Jean-marie Baland

Bilijo David

Journal of Reviews on Global Economics

Phathutshedzo Madumi

The World Bank Research Observer

Daniel Kaufman

David Hulme

Governance Challenges and Innovations

Piero Stanig

Alicia Rémont Ospina

chidi lloyd

RELATED TOPICS

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

sustainability-logo

Article Menu

literature review on economic development pdf

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Development of risk quantification models in road infrastructure projects.

literature review on economic development pdf

1. Introduction

Literature review, 2. methodology and tools, 2.1. risk quantification.

  • Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)
  • Cluster Analysis

2.2. Software and Tools Used

3.1. project dataset, 3.2. identification of factors, 3.3. risk occurrence in projects.

  • Ai—the average number of occurrences of risk i;
  • Σfi—the sum of occurrences for each project;
  • N—the total number of projects.

3.4. Quantification of ICP and EoT

  • EoT c —total number of days of delay per Claim or/and Variation Order;
  • EoT Rmri —the major risk;
  • EoT Rsri —the secondary risks;
  • n—the number of secondary risks;
  • i—the index of the secondary risk, starting from 1.
  • ICP c —total number of days of delay per Claim or/and Variation Order;
  • ICP Rmri —the major risk; ICP Rsri —the secondary risks;

3.5. Risk Classification

  • EoT major norm —the major normalized EoT risk; EoT sec norm —the secondary normalized EoT risk;
  • ICP major norm —the major normalized ICP risk; ICP sec norm —the secondary normalized ICP risk;
  • PoR major norm —the major normalized PoR; PoR sec norm —the secondary normalized PoR.
  • 1.1 Non-compliance of the project with environmental conditions due to inappropriate design bases (0.39);
  • 1.11 Inapplicable project documentation for high cuts, including tunnel portals (0.31);
  • 1.9 Unresolved collisions with existing infrastructure facilities (underground installations, pipelines, local roads, railways, etc.) (0.28);
  • 1.5 Delays in the creation or changes in project documentation during execution (0.26);
  • 1.4 Non-compliance in parts of project documentation (0.26).

3.6. Model Validation

4. discussion, prioritization of risks and preventive measures.

  • 1.1 Non-compliance of the project with environmental conditions due to inappropriate design bases.
  • Preventive Measures:
  • A higher or satisfactory level of geological tests to enable the most accurate preparation of the base (as few approximations as possible);
  • Installation of an adequate number of piezometers to monitor the level of underground water;
  • Adequate geodetic surveying to create a geodetic base (instead of relying on data from the existing inaccurate network to reduce the costs of geodetic surveying);
  • Addressing all holders of public authority for them to issue location conditions;
  • Detailed previous archeological research;
  • Data on hydrological and climatic impacts must be regularly updated.
  • 1.11 Inapplicable project documentation for high cuts, including tunnel portals.
  • A higher or satisfactory level of geological research;
  • Conducting basic preliminary field research in the design phase;
  • An adequate number of laboratory tests during the development of project documentation;
  • Greater control when creating project documentation;
  • Agreed penalties for errors in projects;
  • Stricter criteria in the designer selection process (requiring more references);
  • Holding responsible designers accountable;
  • Introduction of design supervision in practice (during project implementation).
  • 1.9 Unresolved collisions with existing infrastructure facilities (underground installations, pipelines, local roads, railways, etc.).
  • Addressing all holders of public authority, including all cable operators and local public companies, for the issuance of location conditions;
  • Consistent compliance with the issued location conditions in terms of crossing with and relocation of existing infrastructure facilities;
  • Identification of all collisions on the ground before the start of construction in order to determine those that are not included in the location conditions;
  • Timely conclusion of contracts on relocation of installations to define mutual relations with their owners;
  • Introduction of user supervision of installation owners during the execution of works;
  • A contract-defined mechanism for the relocation of uncharted simple communal installations (e.g., rural water lines and sewers);
  • Creation of an adequate utility synchronization plan.
  • 1.5 Delays in the creation or changes in project documentation during execution.
  • Determination of an adequate deadline for the preparation of project documentation;
  • Greater control during the design itself;
  • Performing technical control in parallel with the design process (introducing phases);
  • More thorough work by members of the Revision Commission (without political influence);
  • Increased responsibility for designers;
  • Changes in the local laws in this area to prescribe the designer’s obligation to eliminate all deficiencies in the project documentation;
  • 1.4 Non-compliance in parts of project documentation.
  • Greater control during the creation of the basic project;

5. Conclusions

Author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

  • Viswanathan, S.K.; Tripathi, K.K.; Jha, K.N. Influence of Risk Mitigation Measures on International Construction Project Success Criteria–A Survey of Indian Experiences. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2020 , 38 , 207–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dandage, R.V.; Mantha, S.S.; Rane, S.B.; Bhoola, V. Analysis of Interactions among Barriers in Project Risk Management. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 2018 , 14 , 153–169. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ahsan, K.; Gunawan, I. Analysis of Cost and Schedule Performance of International Development Projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2010 , 28 , 68–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Han, S.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Kim, H.; Jang, W.S. A Web-Based Integrated System for International Project Risk Management. Autom. Constr. 2008 , 17 , 342–356. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lee, J.; Jung, D.; Baek, C.; Hu, Y.-C.; Lin, M.-H.; Tsai, J.-F.; Nguyen, P.-H.; Lu, M.-T.; Lee, J.; Jung, D.; et al. An Analytical Study Predicting Future Conditions and Application Strategies of Concrete Bridge Pavement Based on Pavement Management System Database. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 16680. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Deng, X.; Low, S.P. Exploring Critical Variables That Affect Political Risk Level in International Construction Projects: Case Study from Chinese Contractors. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2013 , 140 , 04013002. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, S.Q.; Dulaimi, M.F.; Aguria, M.Y. Risk Management Framework for Construction Projects in Developing Countries. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2004 , 22 , 237–252. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chen, D.; Zhang, P.; Pan, T.; Liao, Y.; Zhao, H. Evaluation of the Eco-Friendly Crushed Waste Oyster Shell Mortars Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 237 , 117811. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liao, Y.; Fan, J.; Li, R.; Da, B.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y. Influence of the Usage of Waste Oyster Shell Powder on Mechanical Properties and Durability of Mortar. Adv. Powder Technol. 2022 , 33 , 103503. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shao, S.; Tian, P.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, L. An Analytical Investigation into the Water Film Dynamics at the Connection Lines of Highways and Urban Roadways. J. Urban Dev. Manag. 2023 , 2 , 181–195. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Trifunović, A.; Senić, A.; Čičević, S.; Ivanišević, T.; Vukšić, V.; Simović, S. Evaluating the Road Environment through the Lens of Professional Drivers: A Traffic Safety Perspective. Mechatronics Intell. Transp. Syst. 2024 , 3 , 31–38. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ivanišević, T.; Simović, S.; Trifunović, A.; Vukšić, V. Perception of Large Danger Lists and Orange Boards for Marking Transport Units. J. Urban Dev. Manag. 2024 , 3 , 74–82. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Stević, Ž.; Subotić, M.; Softić, E.; Božić, B. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Safety of Road Sections. J. Intell. Manag. Decis. 2022 , 1 , 78–87. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kodepogu, K.; Manjeti, V.B.; Siriki, A.B. Machine Learning for Road Accident Severity Prediction. Mechatronics Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023 , 2 , 211–226. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kotapati, G.; Ali, M.A.; Vatambeti, R. Deep Learning-Enhanced Hybrid Fruit Fly Optimization for Intelligent Traffic Control in Smart Urban Communities. Mechatronics Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023 , 2 , 89–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kan, H.; Li, K.; Wang, Z. An Integrated Convolutional Neural Network-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory-Attention Mechanism Model for Enhanced Highway Traffic Flow Prediction. J. Urban Dev. Manag. 2024 , 3 , 18–33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Afzal, F.; Yunfei, S.; Nazir, M.; Bhatti, S.M. A Review of Artificial Intelligence Based Risk Assessment Methods for Capturing Complexity-Risk Interdependencies: Cost Overrun in Construction Projects. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2021 , 14 , 300–328. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lozano-Ramírez, N.E.; Sánchez, O.; Carrasco-Beltrán, D.; Vidal-Méndez, S.; Castañeda, K. Digitalization and Sustainability in Linear Projects Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 15962. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Xu, X.; Wang, J.; Li, C.Z.; Huang, W.; Xia, N. Schedule Risk Analysis of Infrastructure Projects: A Hybrid Dynamic Approach. Autom. Constr. 2018 , 95 , 20–34. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Assaf, S.A.; Al-Hejji, S. Causes of Delay in Large Construction Projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006 , 24 , 349–357. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Luu, V.T.; Kim, S.Y.; Van Tuan, N.; Ogunlana, S.O. Quantifying Schedule Risk in Construction Projects Using Bayesian Belief Networks. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2009 , 27 , 39–50. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Silva, G.A.; Warnakulasooriya, B.N.F.; Arachchige, B. Criteria for Construction Project Success: A Literature Review. SSRN Electron. J. 2016 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sarkar, S.; Bhaskar, M.S.; Rao, K.U.; Prema, V.; Almakhles, D.; Subramaniam, U. Solar PV Network Installation Standards and Cost Estimation Guidelines for Smart Cities. Alex. Eng. J. 2022 , 61 , 1277–1287. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Elfahham, Y. Estimation and Prediction of Construction Cost Index Using Neural Networks, Time Series, and Regression. Alex. Eng. J. 2019 , 58 , 499–506. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Allahi, F.; Cassettari, L.; Mosca, M. Stochastic Risk Analysis and Cost Contingency Allocation Approach for Construction Projects Applying Monte Carlo Simulation. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London, UK, 5–7 July 2017; pp. 385–391. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Vegas-Fernández, F. Project Risk Costs: Estimation Overruns Caused When Using Only Expected Value for Contingency Calculations. J. Manag. Eng. 2022 , 38 , 04022037. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Flyvbjerg, B.; Bester, D.W. The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It. J. Benefit-Cost Anal. 2021 , 12 , 395–419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Valipour, A.; Yahaya, N.; Md Noor, N.; Kildiene, S.; Sarvari, H.; Mardani, A. A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process Method for Risk Prioritization in Freeway PPP Projects: An Iranian Case Study. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2015 , 21 , 933–947. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Fang, C.; Marle, F. Dealing with Project Complexity by Matrix-Based Propagation Modelling for Project Risk Analysis. J. Eng. Des. 2013 , 24 , 239–256. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Qazi, A.; Quigley, J.; Dickson, A.; Kirytopoulos, K. Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): Towards Modelling Project Complexity Driven Risk Paths in Construction Projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2016 , 34 , 1183–1198. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Islam, M.S.; Nepal, M.P.; Skitmore, M.; Attarzadeh, M. Current Research Trends and Application Areas of Fuzzy and Hybrid Methods to the Risk Assessment of Construction Projects. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2017 , 33 , 112–131. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Islam, M.S.; Nepal, M. A Fuzzy-Bayesian Model for Risk Assessment in Power Plant Projects. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016 , 100 , 963–970. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hsiao, H.S.; Chen, J.C. Using a Gesture Interactive Game-Based Learning Approach to Improve Preschool Children’s Learning Performance and Motor Skills. Comput. Educ. 2016 , 95 , 151–162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Fang, C.; Marle, F. A Simulation-Based Risk Network Model for Decision Support in Project Risk Management. Decis. Support Syst. 2012 , 52 , 635–644. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liu, J.; Zhao, X.; Yan, P. Risk Paths in International Construction Projects: Case Study from Chinese Contractors. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2016 , 142 , 05016002. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Pehlivan, S.; Öztemir, A.E. Integrated Risk of Progress-Based Costs and Schedule Delays in Construction Projects. Eng. Manag. J. 2018 , 30 , 108–116. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kululanga, G.; Kuotcha, W. Measuring Project Risk Management Process for Construction Contractors with Statement Indicators Linked to Numerical Scores. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2010 , 17 , 336–351. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dandage, R.; Mantha, S.S.; Rane, S.B. Ranking the Risk Categories in International Projects Using the TOPSIS Method. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2018 , 11 , 317–331. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Issa, U.H.; Mosaad, S.A.A.; Salah Hassan, M. Evaluation and Selection of Construction Projects Based on Risk Analysis. Structures 2020 , 27 , 361–370. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Khalilzadeh, M.; Banihashemi, S.A.; Božanić, D. A Step-By-Step Hybrid Approach Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and A Bi-Objective Optimization Model to Project Risk Management. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2024 , 7 , 442–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nikolić, I.; Milutinović, J.; Božanić, D.; Dobrodolac, M. Using an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AROMAN Decision-Making Method to Improve the Sustainability of the Postal Network in Rural Areas. Mathematics 2023 , 11 , 3105. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Drobne, S.; Lisec, A. Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis in GIS: Weighted Linear Combination and Ordered Weighted Averaging. Informatica 2009 , 33 , 459. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chan, D.W.M.; Kumaraswamy, M.M. A Comparative Study of Causes of Time Overruns in Hong Kong Construction Projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 1997 , 15 , 55–63. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gondia, A.; Siam, A.; El-Dakhakhni, W.; Nassar, A.H. Machine Learning Algorithms for Construction Projects Delay Risk Prediction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2019 , 146 , 04019085. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gunduz, M.; Yahya, A.M.A. Analysis of Project Success Factors in Construction Industry. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2018 , 24 , 67–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rachid, Z.; Toufik, B.; Mohammed, B. Causes of Schedule Delays in Construction Projects in Algeria. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2019 , 19 , 371–381. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Santoso, D.S.; Soeng, S. Analyzing Delays of Road Construction Projects in Cambodia: Causes and Effects. J. Manag. Eng. 2016 , 32 , 05016020. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Marle, F.; Vidal, L.A. Project Risk Management Processes: Improving Coordination Using a Clustering Approach. Res. Eng. Des. 2011 , 22 , 189–206. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kv¥lseth, T.O. Cautionary Note about R. Am. Stat. 1985 , 39 , 279–285. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chicco, D.; Warrens, M.J.; Jurman, G. The Coefficient of Determination R-Squared Is More Informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in Regression Analysis Evaluation. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2021 , 7 , e623. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Willmott, C.J.; Matsuura, K. Advantages of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) over the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in Assessing Average Model Performance. Clim. Res. 2005 , 30 , 79–82. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chen, L.; Manley, K. Validation of an Instrument to Measure Governance and Performance on Collaborative Infrastructure Projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014 , 140 , 04014006. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Acampa, G.; Marino, G.; Ticali, D. Validation of Infrastructures through BIM. In AIP Conference Proceedings ; AIP Publishing: Melville, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 2186. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bratu, P.; Tonciu, O.; Nițu, M.C. Modeling the Vibratory Compaction Process for Roads. Buildings 2023 , 13 , 2837. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zakarka, M.; Skuodis, Š.; Dirgėlienė, N. Triaxial Test of Coarse-Grained Soils Reinforced with One Layer of Geogrid. Appl. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 12480. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

AuthorsThe Title of the PaperYearMethodologyKey Research Results
Wang, Dulaimi, and Aguria [ ]Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries2004Alien Eyes’ Risk ModelTwenty-eight critical risks were identified and categorized on three (state, market, and project) hierarchical levels, and their criticality was assessed and ranked.
Luu, Kim, Van, and Ogunlana [ ]Quantifying schedule risk in construction projects using Bayesian belief networks2009Bayesian belief networksSixteen factors were identified that can have a direct impact on exceeding deadlines.
Kululanga and Kuotcha [ ]Measuring project risk management process for construction contractors, with statement indicators linked to numerical scores2010Statistical analysisMost of the variables in the project risk management process were positively and significantly related to the progression in size and the experience of construction contractors.
Dandage, Mantha, and Rane [ ]Ranking the risk categories in international projects using the TOPSIS method2018TOPSIS methodIdentification of eight different types of risk categories associated with international projects.
Viswanathan, Tripathi, and Jha [ ]Influence of risk mitigation measures on international construction project success criteria—a survey of Indian experiences2020Factor analysisThe positive relationship between risk mitigation factors and project success (coefficient 0.8).
Issa, Mosaad, and Salah Hassan [ ]Evaluation and selection of construction projects based on risk analysis2020AHP, Fuzzy risk analysis modelFive criteria and seventy factors influencing the decision of the contractor were identified, and the weight and importance of each criterion were determined.
Khalilzadeh, Banihashemi, and Božanić [ ]A Step-By-Step Hybrid Approach Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and A Bi-Objective Optimization Model to Project Risk Management2024Fuzzy methodAn innovative and reliable hybrid approach based on MCDM and mathematical optimization methods was proposed.
Our StudyDevelopment of Risk Quantification Models in Road Infrastructure Projects2024Aggregation models; Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) method; cluster analysis.From the literature and completed projects, 7 groups of factors, with a total of 56 factors, which influence the increase in the price and the extension of the deadline for the construction of infrastructure projects were identified.
Every factor is quantified (price and number of days).
Prevention measures were defined for the factors that have the greatest impact on increasing the costs and time of construction of infrastructure projects.
Accepted Contract Amount [EUR]Time for Completion [Days]The Length of the Section [km]ICP [EUR]EoT [Days]
Average27,278,833.36~6107.2341,343,706.21~743
Min3,283,504.451200.171,537,082.860
Max74,738,676.0590021.40194,166,387.132075
Design1.1 Non-compliance of the project with environmental conditions due to inappropriate design bases.
1.2 Lack of details and technical specifications in the project documentation (insufficiently elaborated parts of the project documentation).
1.3 Complex design or inappropriate construction technology.
1.4 Non-compliance in parts of project documentation.
1.5 Delays in the production or changes in project documentation during execution.
1.6 Incorrect Bill of Quantities of works.
1.7 Insufficiently examined and imprecisely determined locations, as well as available quantities of materials in borrow pits.
1.8 Failure to provide adequate locations for deposit areas for excavated materials.
1.9 Unresolved collisions with existing infrastructure facilities (underground installations, pipelines, local roads, railways, etc.).
1.10 Inadequate design of riverbeds and storm water treatment.
1.11 Inapplicable project documentation for high cuts, including tunnel portals.
External2.1 Problems with property–legal relations (e.g., expropriation, etc.).
2.2 Delay in obtaining permits and approvals from relevant authorities.
2.3 Problems with obtaining a use permit.
2.4 Local regulations regarding the construction of tunnels are insufficient.
2.5 Changes in laws and regulations.
2.6 Banks—compliance with the environmental and social requirements of each bank.
2.7 Exchange rate instability and resource price spikes.
2.8 New environmental restrictions or unforeseen circumstances (archeological sites, mines and explosives, etc.).
2.9 Exceptionally adverse weather conditions.
2.10 Force majeure (natural disasters, pandemic, epidemic, etc.).
Resource3.1 Labor shortage.
3.2 Low productivity and unskilled labor force.
3.3 Lack of materials on the market.
3.4 Inadequate quality of materials.
3.5 Equipment failures and obsolete machinery.
3.6 Lack of equipment (mechanization).
Employer4.1 Delays in payment of Interim Payment Certificate by the Employer.
4.2 Variation Order request.
4.3 Slow decision-making.
4.4 Poor communication between the Employer and other project participants.
4.5 Lack of funds or lengthy procedure for financing unforeseen works and Variation Orders.
4.6 Delay in handing over (parts of) the construction site to the contractor.
4.7 A long period of additional contracting for unforeseen and subsequent works (especially due to changes during implementation).
Contractor5.1 Re-execution of works due to errors or poor quality of the works performed.
5.2 Poor financial condition of the contractor.
5.3 Inefficient planning and management of works on the construction site.
5.4 Inadequate experience of the contractor.
5.5 Irresponsible execution of works and jeopardizing the safety of other works.
5.6 The contractor entering the OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) list of sanctioned persons and companies.
Engineer6.1 Lack of experience and expertise on the part of the engineer.
6.2. Insufficient number of engineering team members.
6.3 Avoiding professional supervision to take a proactive role and issue instructions.
6.4 Delays in reviewing and certifying the performed works.
6.5 Delays in the review and approval of the Method Statement.
6.6 Delays in the review and approval of materials.
Project7.1 Inadequate duration of the project according to the contract.
7.2 Inadequate or imprecise contract terms.
7.3 Unsolved Claims, Variations, and VEPs.
7.4 High complexity of the project (scope of works, topography, access restrictions, new technologies, etc.).
7.5 Disputes between different parties involved in the project during the implementation of the works.
7.6 Inadequate Cash Flow of the project.
7.7 Poor Contract Management of the project.
7.8 Termination of the contract.
7.9 Non-compliance of the contractor’s activities on adjacent construction sites.
7.10 Accidents on the construction site.
Risk GroupRisks(a) Average Number of Occurrences of Major Risk(b) Average Number of Occurrences of Secondary Risk
Design1.110.5418.64
1.23.572.32
1.32.574.64
1.47.0410.54
1.53.939.04
1.63.753.21
1.73.180.54
1.82.570.68
1.912.044.39
1.108.252.39
1.1113.293.36
External2.11.570.96
2.22.215.46
2.32.430.82
2.40.320.07
2.51.750.82
2.61.610.50
2.71.210.36
2.80.360.32
2.90.180.54
2.10 0.14
Resource3.1 5.46
3.20.250.82
3.30.070.07
3.41.864.04
3.5 0.07
3.6 0.07
Employer4.10.460.21
4.22.255.07
4.30.180.21
4.4 0.04
4.50.180.25
4.60.320.79
4.7 0.07
Contractor5.10.390.43
5.20.320.25
5.30.110.11
5.4 0.21
5.50.040.14
5.60.210.04
Engineer6.10.110.11
6.2. 0.04
6.3 0.11
6.4 0.14
6.50.110.14
6.6 0.21
Project7.10.290.29
7.21.642.71
7.30.611.11
7.41.821.61
7.50.680.39
7.6 0.14
7.70.250.29
7.80.360.18
7.92.820.79
7.10 0.39
EoT [%]ICP [%]
Risk GroupRisksMajor RiskSecondary RiskMajor RiskSecondary Risk
Design1.110.253.241.240.35
1.2 2.770.410.30
1.3 2.421.050.28
1.49.643.181.240.16
1.529.572.342.910.43
1.6 3.289.750.56
1.77.151.871.571.11
1.8 2.391.070.51
1.920.272.520.330.21
1.10 3.160.550.18
1.1116.282.665.660.39
External2.131.692.892.260.07
2.228.032.970.830.49
2.3 2.530.360.31
2.4 4.310.170.01
2.5 2.900.940.05
2.6 2.811.120.67
2.72.572.1010.840.37
2.810.411.690.300.51
2.94.093.401.490.57
2.10 1.47 0.40
Resource3.1 0.35 0.18
3.2 0.352.460.18
3.3 2.930.500.78
3.4 3.441.130.18
3.5 1.63 0.02
3.6 1.63 0.01
Employer4.14.784.240.260.95
4.2 2.330.370.12
4.37.156.563.000.69
4.4 0.56 0.03
4.5 4.110.060.02
4.624.173.813.460.33
4.7 1.22 0.63
Contractor5.1 3.430.370.54
5.26.972.632.613.99
5.32.811.549.870.03
5.4 3.23 0.20
5.5 1.011.240.34
5.64.832.177.563.55
Engineer6.1 1.530.040.30
6.2. 8.12 0.03
6.3 2.75 0.35
6.4 1.88 0.02
6.5 2.100.290.09
6.6 3.10 0.35
Project7.1 2.220.930.13
7.20.692.350.400.19
7.30.032.280.300.76
7.40.022.525.100.16
7.50.332.713.750.29
7.6 6.11 1.45
7.7 0.910.240.05
7.8 8.9921.220.58
7.90.632.671.810.34
7.10 1.64 0.81
Occurrences of RiskImpact of Risk EoTImpact of Risk ICP
Risk GroupRisksMajorSecondaryMajor RiskSecondary RiskMajor RiskSecondary RiskRisk Score
Design1.10.79311.00000.14860.26620.03010.08770.39
1.20.26860.1245 0.22760.00990.07520.12
1.30.19340.2489 0.19880.02550.07020.12
1.40.52970.56550.13980.26130.03010.04010.26
1.50.29570.48500.42870.19230.07060.10780.26
1.60.28220.1722 0.26950.23650.14040.18
1.70.23930.02900.10370.15370.03810.27820.14
1.80.19340.0365 0.19640.02600.12780.10
1.90.90590.23550.29390.20710.00800.05260.28
1.100.62080.1282 0.25970.01330.04510.18
1.111.00000.18030.23600.21860.13730.09770.31
External2.10.11810.05150.45950.23750.05480.01750.16
2.20.16630.29290.40640.24400.02010.12280.21
2.30.18280.0440 0.20790.00870.07770.09
2.40.02410.0038 0.35410.00410.00250.06
2.50.13170.0440 0.23830.02280.01250.07
2.60.12110.0268 0.23090.02720.16790.10
2.70.09100.01930.03730.17260.26300.09270.11
2.80.02710.01720.15090.13890.00730.12780.08
2.90.01350.02900.05930.27940.03610.14290.09
2.10 0.0075 0.1208 0.10030.04
Resource3.1 0.2929 0.0288 0.04510.06
3.20.01880.0440 0.02880.05970.04510.03
3.30.00530.0038 0.24080.01210.19550.08
3.40.14000.2167 0.28270.02740.04510.12
3.5 0.0038 0.1339 0.00500.02
3.6 0.0038 0.1339 0.00250.02
Employer4.10.03460.01130.06930.34840.00630.23810.12
4.20.16930.2720 0.19150.00900.03010.11
4.30.01350.01130.10370.53900.07280.17290.15
4.4 0.0021 0.0460 0.00750.01
4.50.01350.0134 0.33770.00150.00500.06
4.60.02410.04240.35040.31310.08390.08270.15
4.7 0.0038 0.1002 0.15790.04
Contractor5.10.02930.0231 0.28180.00900.13530.08
5.20.02410.01340.10110.21610.06331.00000.24
5.30.00830.00590.04070.12650.23940.00750.07
5.4 0.0113 0.2654 0.05010.05
5.50.00300.0075 0.08300.03010.08520.03
5.60.01580.00210.07000.17830.18340.88970.22
Engineer6.10.00830.0059 0.12570.00100.07520.04
6.2. 0.0021 0.6672 0.00750.11
6.3 0.0059 0.2260 0.08770.05
6.4 0.0075 0.1545 0.00500.03
6.50.00830.0075 0.17260.00700.02260.04
6.6 0.0113 0.2547 0.08770.06
Project7.10.02180.0156 0.18240.02260.03260.05
7.20.12340.14540.01000.19310.00970.04760.09
7.30.04590.05950.00040.18730.00730.19050.08
7.40.13690.08640.00030.20710.12370.04010.10
7.50.05120.02090.00480.22270.09100.07270.08
7.6 0.0075 0.5021 0.36340.15
7.70.01880.0156 0.07480.00580.01250.02
7.80.02710.0097 0.73870.51480.14540.24
7.90.21220.04240.00910.21940.04390.08520.10
7.10 0.0209 0.1348 0.20300.06
ICP
Major RiskSecondary Risk
MAEMSER MAEMSER
1.10.160.01860.95780.060.00520.9622
1.110.180.03490.040.0034
1.90.110.00720.070.0068
1.50.360.07290.080.0095
1.40.480.08580.130.0124
EoT
Major RiskSecondary Risk
MAEMSER MAEMSER
1.10.430.16470.94860.190.03840.9602
1.110.620.41410.120.0105
1.90.891.30840.090.0092
1.50.921.34810.210.0184
1.40.771.02380.260.0242
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Senić, A.; Dobrodolac, M.; Stojadinović, Z. Development of Risk Quantification Models in Road Infrastructure Projects. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177694

Senić A, Dobrodolac M, Stojadinović Z. Development of Risk Quantification Models in Road Infrastructure Projects. Sustainability . 2024; 16(17):7694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177694

Senić, Aleksandar, Momčilo Dobrodolac, and Zoran Stojadinović. 2024. "Development of Risk Quantification Models in Road Infrastructure Projects" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177694

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Progressive trend, conceptual terminology, and future directions of green façade research: A review of literature in 2010–2023

  • Original Paper
  • Published: 02 September 2024

Cite this article

literature review on economic development pdf

  • Y. Cui 1 , 2 ,
  • J. Tang 3 &
  • B.-J. He 2 , 4 , 5  

Climate change and urbanization have caused environmental problems to cities, making it critical to build a low-carbon, resilient, and sustainable urban environment. Green façade (GFA) is an important nature-based solution for implementation by exploring urban vertical space. GFA is often expected to meet versatile needs across different fields, but existing literature has not well documented the evolution of green façade research and future directions. Accordingly, this study examined GFA studies in 2010–2023 through a review to identify progressive trends, conceptual terminology, knowledge gaps, and future research directions. Overall, the GFA could be described by 46 additional terms given structure, vegetation, and technique properties. GFA research has evolved into transdisciplinary research, but mainly includes four clusters: (1) urban greening and sustainability; (2) energy saving mechanism and associated factors; (3) green infrastructure and cooling benefits; and (4) modelling and simulation for heat island mitigation and microclimate regulation. However, the ecological properties, lighting, and acoustic performance of GFA have scarcely been analyzed. Europe and China were key contributors of relevant literature, and there was strong co-authorship among authors from an organization, region, or country. Future efforts should focus on (1) verification and quantification of GFA environmental, ecological, and health benefits, (2) technical needs, economic benefits, social acceptance and support, and policy formation for promotion, (3) development of efficient and tangible numerical models and GFA typology for parametric analysis, and (4) promotion of inter-department, inter-organization, and inter-regional collaboration. Overall, this study enhances GFA understanding to enable the transformation from research to practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

literature review on economic development pdf

Similar content being viewed by others

literature review on economic development pdf

Green Infrastructure and Urban Sustainability: An Editorial

Towards sustainable urban green infrastructures.

literature review on economic development pdf

Potential advantages in combining smart and green infrastructure over silo approaches for future cities

Explore related subjects.

  • Environmental Chemistry

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

Barry ES, Merkebu J, Varpio L (2022) Understanding State-of-the-Art Literature Reviews. J Grad Med Educ 14(6):659–662

Article   Google Scholar  

Besir AB, Cuce E (2018) Green roofs and facades: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:915–939

Bustami RA, Belusko M, Ward J, Beecham S (2018) Vertical greenery systems: a systematic review of research trends. Build Environ 146:226–237

Coma J, Pérez G, de Gracia A, Burés S, Urrestarazu M, Cabeza LF (2017) Vertical greenery systems for energy savings in buildings: a comparative study between green walls and green facades. Build Environ 111:228–237

Cui Y, Yin M, Cheng X, Tang J, He BJ (2024) Towards cool cities and communities: preparing for an increasingly hot future by the development of heat-resilient infrastructure and urban heat management plan. Environ Technol Innov 34:103568

Dong X, He BJ (2023) A standardized assessment framework for green roof decarbonization: a review of embodied carbon, carbon sequestration, bioenergy supply, and operational carbon scenarios. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 182:113376

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

El Menshawy AS, Mohamed AF, Fathy NM (2022) A comparative study on green wall construction systems, case study: South valley campus of AASTMT. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:e00808

Google Scholar  

Faivre N, Fritz M, Freitas T, De Boissezon B, Vandewoestijne S (2017) Nature-based solutions in the EU: innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environ Res 159:509–518

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of pubmed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342

He BJ, Wang J, Liu H, Ulpiani G (2021) Localized synergies between heat waves and urban heat islands: Implications on human thermal comfort and urban heat management. Environ Research 193:110584

He BJ, Wang J, Zhu J, Qi J (2022) Beating the urban heat: situation, background, impacts and the way forward in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 161:112350

He BJ, Wang W, Sharifi A, Liu X (2023) Progress, knowledge gap and future directions of urban heat mitigation and adaptation research through a bibliometric review of history and evolution. Energy Build 287:112976

Hu Z, Zayed T, Cheng L (2021) A critical review of acoustic modeling and research on building façade. Build Acoustics 29(1):107–134

Hunter AM, Williams NS, Rayner JP, Aye L, Hes D, Livesley SJ (2014) Quantifying the thermal performance of green façades: a critical review. Ecol Eng 63:102–113

IPCC 2022. Summary for Policymakers. In: INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE, C. (ed.) Global Warming of 1.5°C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-4

Liu Y, Fang X, Xu Y, Zhang S, Luan Q (2018) Assessment of surface urban heat island across China’s three main urban agglomerations. Theoret Appl Climatol 133(1):473–488

Liu H, Huang B, Cheng X, Yin M, Shang C, Luo Y, He BJ (2023) Sensing-based park cooling performance observation and assessment: a review. Build Environ 245:110915

Mallett R, Hagen-Zanker J, Slater R, Duvendack M (2012) The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. J Dev Eff 4(3):445–455

Manso M, Castro-Gomes J (2015) Green wall systems: a review of their characteristics. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:863–871

Manso M, Teotónio I, Silva CM, Cruz CO (2021) Green roof and green wall benefits and costs: a review of the quantitative evidence. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 135:110111

Mostarshedi S, Richalot E, Laheurte JM, Wong MF, Wiart J, Picon O (2010) Fast and accurate calculation of scattered electromagnetic fields from building faces using Green’s functions of semi-infinite medium. IET Microwaves Antennas Propag 4(1):72–82

Nalau J, Verrall B (2021) Mapping the evolution and current trends in climate change adaptation science. Climate Risk Manag 32:100290

Norton BA, Coutts AM, Livesley SJ, Harris RJ, Hunter AM, Williams NS (2015) Planning for cooler cities: a framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landsc Urb Plann 134:127–138

O’Hogain S, McCarton L, O’Hogain S, McCarton L (2018) Nature-Based Solutions. Innovations in Water Management, A Technology Portfolio of Nature Based Solutions, pp 1–9

Oke TR, Mills G, Christen A, Voogt JA (2017) Urban Climates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Book   Google Scholar  

Ottelé M, van Bohemen HD, Fraaij ALA (2010) Quantifying the deposition of particulate matter on climber vegetation on living walls. Ecol Eng 36(2):154–162

Ottelé M, Perini K, Fraaij ALA, Haas EM, Raiteri R (2011) Comparative life cycle analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Energy and Buildings 43(12):3419–3429

Pérez G, Rincón L, Vila A, González JM, Cabeza LF (2011) Green vertical systems for buildings as passive systems for energy savings. Appl Energy 88(12):4854–4859

Pérez G, Coma J, Martorell I, Cabeza LF (2014) Vertical Greenery Systems (VGS) for energy saving in buildings: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:139–165

Pérez G, Coma J, Sol S, Cabeza LF (2017) Green facade for energy savings in buildings: The influence of leaf area index and facade orientation on the shadow effect. Appl Energy 187:424–437

Perini K, Rosasco P (2013) Cost–benefit analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Build Environ 70:110–121

Perini K, Ottelé M, Fraaij ALA, Haas EM, Raiteri R (2011) Vertical greening systems and the effect on air flow and temperature on the building envelope. Build Environ 46(11):2287–2294

Prasad D, Kuru A, Oldfield P, Ding L, Dave M, Noller C, He B (2023) Delivering on the climate emergency: Towards a net zero carbon built environment. Springer Nature, Singapore

Rathnayake U, Lau D, Chow CL. 2020. Review on Energy and Fire Performance of Water Wall Systems as a Green Building Façade. Sustainability [Online], 12.

Rayner JP, Raynor KJ, Williams NSG (2010) Façade greening: a case study from Melbourne, Australia. Acta Hort 881:709–713

Robine JM, Cheung SL, Le Roy S, Van Oyen H, Griffiths C, Michel JP, Herrmann FR (2008) Death toll exceeded 70,000 in Europe during the summer of 2003. C R Biol 331(2):171–178

Shaposhnikov D, Revich B, Bellander T, Bedada GB, Bottai M, Kharkova T, Kvasha E, Lezina E, Lind T, Semutnikova E (2014) Mortality related to air pollution with the Moscow heat wave and wildfire of 2010. Epidemiology 25(3):359

Sohn W, Kim JH, Li MH, Brown RD, Jaber FH (2020) How does increasing impervious surfaces affect urban flooding in response to climate variability? Ecol Ind 118:106774

European Union (2022) EU saw 53,000 excess deaths in July amid record heatwave: report. In (Vol. On September 16, 2022. https://globalnews.ca/news/9134651/european-union-excess-deaths-july/ ): Global News.

van Eck N, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538

World Health Organization (2016) Urban green spaces and health. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

Xiong K, He BJ (2024) Planning for heat-resilient educational precincts: Framework formulation, cooling infrastructure selection and walkable routes determination. Sustain Citi Soc 101:105183

Zhang L, Deng Z, Liang L, Zhang Y, Meng Q, Wang J, Santamouris M (2019) Thermal behavior of a vertical green facade and its impact on the indoor and outdoor thermal environment. Energy Build 204:109502

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to appreciate the valuable comments from sessional chairs of 4th International Conference on Urban Climate and Urban Design in Xi’an, China.

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42301339), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2024CDJXY014), the China Meteorological Administration “Research on value realization of climate ecological products” Youth Innovation Team Project (No. CMA2024QN15), and Chongqing Natural Science Foundation Project (No. CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX0670).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China

School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Centre for Climate–Resilient and Low–Carbon Cities, Chongqing, 400045, China

Y. Cui & B.-J. He

School of Urban Planning and Design, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen, 518055, China

Institute for Smart City of Chongqing University in Liyang, Chongqing University, Liyang, Jiangsu, 213300, China

CMA Key Open Laboratory of Transforming Climate Resources to Economy, Chongqing, 401147, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Yi Cui: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Junqing Tang: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, and Writing – review and editing. Bao-Jie He: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, and writing – review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B.-J. He .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: S.Mirkia.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cui, Y., Tang, J. & He, BJ. Progressive trend, conceptual terminology, and future directions of green façade research: A review of literature in 2010–2023. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-06030-8

Download citation

Received : 18 June 2024

Revised : 07 August 2024

Accepted : 27 August 2024

Published : 02 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-06030-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Green façade
  • Energy saving
  • Cooling performance
  • Health effect
  • Pollution purification
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here .

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) Impact of SMEs on Economic Development: A Systematic Review of

    literature review on economic development pdf

  2. (PDF) SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES AND

    literature review on economic development pdf

  3. (PDF) The Role of Financial Sector on Economic Growth: Theoretical and

    literature review on economic development pdf

  4. (PDF) Economic Development and Economic Growth: Case Study

    literature review on economic development pdf

  5. (PDF) Entrepreneurship and economic development: A literature review

    literature review on economic development pdf

  6. (PDF) Taxation and Economic Growth: Theoretical and Empirical

    literature review on economic development pdf

VIDEO

  1. The Decolonization of Development Economics: Early Voices from the Global South

  2. Lecture: 1(2) Comparative Economic Development

  3. Theories of economic development

  4. Economics

COMMENTS

  1. (PDF) Defining and Measuring Economic Development: A Literature Review

    This suggests economic. development is intimately related to the all ocation of resources in a society, either by public. sector policies or market forces and the availability and presence of ...

  2. (Pdf) Good Governance and Its Impact on Economic Development: a

    The literature review allows us to situate our subject in relation with economic development. Table 4 : Synthetic table of bibliographical referen ces Author

  3. Literature review on income inequality and economic growth

    Abstract. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the relationship between income inequality and economic growth. In the theoretical literature, we identified various models in which income inequality is linked to economic growth. They include (i) The level of economic development, (ii) The level of technological development ...

  4. PDF Contemporary Economic Growth Models and Theories: A Literature Review

    That is why a high level of economic growth is one of the main targets of economic policy in many countries around the world. This brief literature review discusses main existing theories and models of economic growth, its endogenous and exogenous aspects. The main purpose of this paper is to determine the current state of development of the ...

  5. Empirical Literature on Economic Growth, 1991-2020: Uncovering Extant

    Five main results are worth highlighting: (a) the share of empirical articles on economic growth show a clear upward trend; (b) among all the groups of countries considered, the emerging economies (EEs) have received the most scientific attention; (c) the economic growth processes of the Latin American and Caribbean EEs have observed negligible ...

  6. PDF Development Policy and Development Economics: An Introduction

    1. The policies that impact development are wide-ranging, all the way from broad macroeconomic policies such as monetary and exchange-rate policies to interventions in microfinance. This is perhaps one of the differences between the economics of development and other fields within economics. Poverty reduction, economic growth, and development

  7. Economic growth : a review of the theoretical and empirical literature

    In recent years, economists have developed new models of endogenous economic growth that consider policy influences on growth and divergent outcomes among countries. . ... Global data and statistics, research and publications, and topics in poverty and development. WORK WITH US. Jobs, procurement, training, and events.

  8. (Pdf) Good Governance and Its Impact on Economic Development: a

    The first step in building up a literature review is to collect references, i.e. the various works that have been conducted to identify the research subject. The effective method 49 Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.

  9. Population Growth and Economic Development: Theoretical Arguments and

    This article examines the theoretical arguments about the likely consequences—positive or negative—of higher population growth on economic development and looks at the empirical findings on the issue based on the survey of literature in the field.

  10. A Literature Review of Pandemics and Development: the Long-Term

    This literature review aims to illustrate, compare, and discuss the mechanisms through which pandemics affect long-term economic development. To achieve this goal, we adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology (Moher et al. 2009).First, we defined a list of keywords that express the main aspects of the "pandemic" and "economic ...

  11. Entrepreneurial Activity and Economic Growth: A Literature Review

    Table 2.1 presents the results of three different models: (1) only regarding the constant, (2) the assessment of entrepreneurship on economic growth, and (3) a similar regression but corrected by sample size. The results presented in Table 2.1 suggest a positive and higher impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth.

  12. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and

    This is done through extensive literature review, combining aspects of the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Recursive Content Abstraction (RCA) ... sustainable development, economic sustainability, social sustainability, environmental sustainability and sustainable development ...

  13. PDF Review of the Literature on the Effectiveness of Economic Development

    Review of the Literature on the Effectiveness of Economic Development Policy Executive summary. Review of the Literature on the Effectiveness of Economic Development Policy Executive summary. Newton Hall Newton Cambridge CB2 5PE Tel: (01223) 871551 Fax:(01223) 871303 [email protected]. Page 1. Background.

  14. PDF Microfinance and Social Development: A Selective Literature Review

    microfinance can promote gender equality in the household and society, resulting in enormous development payoffs. Microcredit may also increase women's bargaining power within the. household (Armendàriz and Morduch 2010), enhancing their self-confidence, role in decision-making, quality of life, and income.

  15. PDF A Literature Review on Population Growth and Economic Development

    A Literature Review on Population Growth and Economic Development H.R. Anulawathie Menike* Srilanka 1. INTRODUCTION There exists a close and reciprocal relationship between population growth and economic development in a country. The population in one way constitutes a source of labor that could be utilized to boost the country's production. ...

  16. PDF Taxation and Economic Development: The State of the Economic Literature

    Bartik (1994a,b) has suggested that the interregional elastic-ity of economic activity with respect to taxes is be-tween 20.1 and 20.6, or that 10 percent lower taxes will raise employment, investment, or firm births between 1 and 6 percent. These findings have impli-cations for state and local tax policy.

  17. Full article: Socio-Economic development and sustainable development

    2. Literature review and hypotheses development. According to the United Nations (UN), poverty is one of the biggest tribulations that have plagued the society. Impoverished people's lack of economic resources, and their inability to generate external financing, further augment their vulnerability to poverty (Samat et al., Citation 2018).

  18. Technology and economic development: A literature review

    Published 31 December 2012. Technology is considered as a key factor for economic development. Many authors in the ¯eld of. technology management mention this impact on economic development as a ...

  19. PDF The Economics of Low-Impact Development: A Literature Review

    This literature review differs from literature reviews that accompany academic studies. Typically, academic literature reviews provide an introduction and a context for an analysis of a specific economic issue, e.g., a new analytical technique that measures economic benefits. In this case, the literature review is a stand-alone document that

  20. PDF Education and Economic Development: A Review of Literature

    This is a review paper on the impact of education on economic development. From the literature review undertaken, it is clear that the contribution of education to economic development may be positive, negative or nothing. There are three distinctive ways of determining contribution of education to economic development: (a) rate of return

  21. PDF Concepts of Sustainable Development; a Literature Review and a

    Sustainable development refers to the development (economic, social & environmental) that is planned and implemented considering the protection of the environment and sustainability. ... Concepts of Sustainable Development; a Literature Review and a Systematic Framework for Connecting the Role of Education with the Sustainable Development Goals ...

  22. Full article: Generic and specific competencies: analysis and

    The article is structured as follows: (1) Literature review, which addresses the theoretical foundation on CBE theory, education for the business administration career and competencies; (2) Methodology, which explains the stages of project development; (3) Qualitative and quantitative results by stages and (4) Discussion and conclusions.

  23. Review Of Theories And Models Of Economic Growth

    Abstract and Figures. The subject of this article is a review of the theories and models of economic growth. In the first section, the author analyzes the theories of economic growth, such as ...

  24. Sustainability

    Road infrastructure is a significant factor in the development of any country, affecting economic growth, social development, and environmental sustainability. Large infrastructure projects often face significant risks and uncertainties, which can lead to delays, budget over-runs, and an insufficient quality of the completed work. These issues undermine the economic viability of projects and ...

  25. (PDF) Impact of SMEs on Economic Development: A Systematic Review of

    Abstract. SMEs are considered the driving force of the country's economic growth via the entrepreneurship process. SMEs also impact economic development based on various aspects such as ...

  26. Development of green manufacturing implementation framework based on

    Climate change stabilization at 1.5 to 2 °C requires a shift in paradigm of industries to transition to low carbon industries. The way forward to decarbonize industries is green manufacturing, as the environmental facet of manufacturing has often been compromised for the sake of economic gains. In order to implicate green manufacturing, it is incumbent upon manufacturing facilities to ...

  27. Progressive trend, conceptual terminology, and future directions of

    Climate change and urbanization have caused environmental problems to cities, making it critical to build a low-carbon, resilient, and sustainable urban environment. Green façade (GFA) is an important nature-based solution for implementation by exploring urban vertical space. GFA is often expected to meet versatile needs across different fields, but existing literature has not well documented ...

  28. Environmental and Social Review Summary

    With 189 member countries, staff from more than 170 countries, and offices in over 130 locations, the World Bank Group is a unique global partnership: five institutions working for sustainable solutions that reduce poverty and build shared prosperity in developing countries.