Sign In or Create an Account
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Mathias grote.
1 Institut für Geschichtswissenschaften, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Friedrichstraße 191-193, 10099 Berlin, Germany
2 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany
3 Department of History, Princeton University, 129 Dickinson Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
4 UCLA Department of History, 6265 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1473 USA
5 ICI Berlin Institute for Cultural Inquiry, Christinenstraße 18/19, Haus 8, 10119 Berlin, Germany
6 Department of History, Program in History of Science, Princeton University, 129 Dickinson Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
7 Technoscience Research Unit, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, 140 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3G6 Canada
This essay considers how scholarly approaches to the development of molecular biology have too often narrowed the historical aperture to genes, overlooking the ways in which other objects and processes contributed to the molecularization of life. From structural and dynamic studies of biomolecules to cellular membranes and organelles to metabolism and nutrition, new work by historians, philosophers, and STS scholars of the life sciences has revitalized older issues, such as the relationship of life to matter, or of physicochemical inquiries to biology. This scholarship points to a novel molecular vista that opens up a pluralist view of molecularizations in the twentieth century and considers their relevance to current science.
Michel Morange once remarked on the absurdity of trying to define molecular biology in abstract or transhistorical terms:
Molecular biology is not merely the description of biology in terms of molecules—if this were the case, it would not only include biochemistry, but also all those nineteenth-century studies in chemistry or in physiology, that led to the characterization of biological molecules. With such a broad definition, even Pasteur would have been a molecular biologist! (Morange 1998 , p. 1, see also Morange 2020 , p. 2).
Twenty-five years have passed since this reflection was first published. And while the inclusion of Louis Pasteur in the history of molecular biology still seems ludicrous, the boundaries of the field still—or once again—seem fluid. One reason for this may be that two decades after the completion of the Human Genome Project, a longue durée view of molecularization enables scholars to better situate the molecular gene as part of a broader endeavor to transform the material basis of biological research into large, portable data sets (Stevens 2013 ; Richardson and Stevens 2015 ; Leonelli 2016 ; Strasser 2019 ). The prominence of DNA sequencing and omics-approaches has increased the scale and pace of research through automation and bioinformatic analysis, and has produced a situation in which “doing life science” has become nearly synonymous with algorithmic thinking and computerized work (Roosth 2017 ; Liu 2017 ). Historiographically and historically, we have reached a point at which it is possible to think about this computationally-inflected history of genomics and proteomics as separate from, but related to, the history of molecular biology.
This historiographical review leads us up to the perceived data- and omics-centric present. It also emphasizes the points of historical friction and divergence from its dominance: behind the language of genetics, the dirty wet lab side of research has always provided a foundation. This admittedly presentist perspective sheds light on some historiographical absences that can prompt new research. Work on the technological frontier of the molecular life sciences includes contemporary philosophical reflections on tinkering with life in the age of synthetic biology and ethnographies of in silico or structural biology (Helmreich 1998 ; Myers 2015 ). Sophia Roosth ( 2017 ) has argued that there is a cohort of synthetic biologists who actively try to automate and suppress genetics at the wet bench. The question is whether it works (de Chadarevian 2018 ).
The genealogies of undervalued laboratory tinkering tap into biophysics, biochemistry, bioenergetics, colloid and surface chemistry, microscopy, and other endeavors that address the terra incognita in between cells and molecules. Even in “classical” molecular biology, including protein chemistry and structural studies (crystallography and electron microscopy) of proteins, viruses, or muscle fibers, chemistry was clearly a leading concern, although rarely trumpeted. In fact, John Kendrew, Max Perutz, Fred Sanger, Linus Pauling, and Gunther Stent were all chemists of some sort (Serafini 1989 ; de Chadarevian 2002 ; James 2007 ; Creager 2009 ). Relatedly, the range of physicists who participated in biology needs reevaluation. This task of reevaluation invites additional reflection upon how the narrative choices of historians might have reinforced the gendering of laboratory workspaces (Creager and Morgan 2008 ; Abir-Am 2014 ; Santesmases 2020 ), or restricted our purview to the west and the Global North in contrast to more transhemispheric understandings (Mignolo 2011 ; Mateos and Suárez 2014 ; Ling and Jiang 2019 ).
These aforementioned sensibilities, with which we now survey the history of the molecular life sciences, lead us to a vista that exhibits different sites of work and labor apart from university laboratories. It also includes diverse geographic regions, institutions, and actors that previously have been marginalized in historical narratives. In this essay, we re-examine the past in order to offer specific insights about areas that have been underattended to as part of the history of post-war molecular biology. In doing so, we opt to bypass the discourse of molecular biology’s disciplinarity by attending to perspectives that broaden the vista, since the longstanding preoccupation with the field’s origins is finally in the rearview mirror. 1 Despite proclamations of a paradigm-shifting epigenetic revolution or of molecular biology's “evaporation” as a discipline (Rheinberger 2009 ), its “vapors”—the representations, imagery, metaphors, and scale of explanatory reasoning—are omnipresent in the life sciences, science education, and cultures of popular science. 2
While the ancient question of how to relate ideas of “life” to those of “matter” persists, the rapid growth of molecular knowledge since the end of the nineteenth century has vastly outstripped the growth of integrative or synthetic conceptions of life (Liu 2019 ). Far from meta-scientific issues such as reductionism or the origin of life, the contributions summarized below highlight a set of questions about nutrition, energy, physiology, microstructure, and animal economy that predate or were concurrent with molecular biology. Below, we outline recent studies which, when examined together, suggest a continuation of research along these lines throughout the twentieth century, even during the perceived half-century of the hegemony of molecular genetics. Our own research questions that have arisen as a result of responding to the dominance of DNA narratives thus revise past narratives as much as they scope out an unexplored molecular vista. This essay resulted from a panel at the International Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology 2019 meeting in Oslo. Participants were Soraya de Chadarevian, Mathias Grote, Daniel Liu, Lisa Onaga, Gina Surita, and Sarah Tracy (presenting a paper co-authored with Hannah Landecker); Angela Creager commented.
Historians have long examined how scientists have come to understand life on a molecular scale by focusing on their methods for visualizing and manipulating structural entities. 3 In his paper, Daniel Liu addressed the question of “structure” in the longer history of molecularization reaching back into the nineteenth century, by analyzing efforts of a heterogenous group of scientists seeking to understand cells at submicroscopic scales. The apotheosis of this branch of molecular biology might be found in the use of electron microscopy to decipher the molecular structures of subcellular organelles, especially the mitochondria, Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum, and so on (see Rasmussen 1997a ). This research continues as an auxiliary, rather than a central, part of cell biology and anatomy. The electron microscope was an instrumental extension of a research program that, prior to WWII, was often referred to as research on “fine structure” or even “sub-microscopic morphology,” using indirect imaging methods such as x-ray diffraction of whole cells in conjunction with polarized light microscopy and other inferential techniques in colloid chemistry. Rather than trying to understand atomic positions within a single molecule, as was the case in x-ray crystallography of protein and nucleic acid fibers, some of these researchers used x-ray diffraction diagrams of whole cells to show how layers of proteins and lipids were arranged, determine how thick each layer was, and obtain clues about the chemical identity of each substance composing these layers. As biophysicist Frank Schmitt put it, this technique could illuminate the “dimensions, configurations, and orientation of molecules” in cells (Schmitt 1944 , p. 1587). This method was further combined with polarization microscopy, allowing analysis of birefringence and refractive index, revealing the “presence of oriented constituents in tissue systems, together with the direction of orientation, shape, crystallinity, partial volume and refractive index of the oriented components” (Schmitt 1944 , p. 1587). X-ray diffraction was computationally intensive but yielded absolute dimensional and geometrical measurements, while polarization microscopy provided a more holistic picture of optical anisotropy, molecular orientation, and hints about material identity—and could be performed much more quickly and easily than x-ray techniques. The use of polarization microscopy to discern submicroscopic structures has a history stretching back to Carl Nägeli’s studies of starch granules in the 1860s, and was given new life once it was combined with early x-ray powder diffraction studies of cellulose in the 1920s.
Mathias Grote’s paper highlighted the continued impact of the combination of chemical and structural thinking in the colloidal “world of neglected dimensions” (Olby 1986 , quoting Wolfgang Ostwald) in the molecular life sciences post-1970. Grote outlined a genealogy of molecular and colloidal practices in the chemiosmotic model of cellular energy generation that Peter Mitchell had proposed in the 1960s, which conceptually and practically linked interwar surface and membrane studies with late-twentieth-century bioenergetics. Grote showed how membrane-enclosed vesicles (liposomes) allowed biochemists from the early 1970s onward to reconstitute cellular structure in the test tube in order to spatialize biochemical reactions, such as the transfer of ions across a membrane. He argued that reconstitution—a concept and practice for the functional assembly of biological molecules into supramolecular structures—illustrates an interplay of modelling, understanding, and making components of life. Reconstitution, formerly employed in virus research (Creager 2002 ), and the resulting “plug-and-play” biology more generally, gained traction after 1980, and aimed at putting together and making work molecular components. Membranes, forming from lipids in aqueous solution by self-organization and by being re-formed, partitioned and inherited during the cellular life cycle, thus display exciting physico-chemical dynamics that have the potential to shake molecular biological certitudes. In the test tube, re-made membranes were fused with isolated proteins, analyzed by microscopy, studied functionally, and put together in different combinations, using synthesized RNA/DNA or recombinant proteins. Plug-and-play has also become fundamental to today’s synthetic biology, where the idea has been extended and commodified, e.g., in biobricks or ongoing projects to create synthetic cells (Grote 2019 ). Moreover, plug-and-play has brought physiology and molecular biology (of physical, chemical, and genetic sorts) into close contact, and has in fact rendered them indistinguishable in many fields, bridging gaps between the molecular, supramolecular/colloidal, and cellular levels of structure. The bacterial cell wall, both as an ultramicroscopic structure and an object of metabolic research in the context of penicillin action, is a related, earlier example for such border crossings. Its research has juxtaposed fields addressing different levels of biological organization and helped create a “chemistry of shape” (Santesmases 2016 , p. 29).
Even the history of genetics, and not just that of DNA, is not immune to the historical importance of structural methods and entities. Soraya de Chadarevian showed that starting in the late 1950s cytogeneticists were able to correlate hereditary diseases with alterations of chromosome structure that were visible under the light microscope, offering important diagnostic tools to medical geneticists. Even though molecular biologists predicted for decades that sequence data would displace older techniques relying on observations of chromosomes under microscopes, that day never arrived. Rather, cytogeneticists proved able to visualize complex mutational events that are hard to identify using the tools of molecular biology. As it turns out, many of these complex chromosome-level mutations (such as translocations and inversions) are key genetic signatures of cancer cells, making cytogenetics especially valuable in oncology and cancer research. Her work suggests that scientific fields do not simply operate as political regimes that replace each other; more often, specialties continue on parallel tracks, and the public visibility of one discipline need not spell the demise of others (de Chadarevian 2020 ). The dynamic three-dimensional structure of chromatin fibers is gaining new salience in studies of epigenetic regulations in the cell, indicating that even in the field of molecular genetics there is much to gain from a perspective that includes structural and cellular next to environmental considerations (Landecker 2015 ).
In addition, methods of structure determination display a greater heterogeneity and topics such as the relation of molecular and cellular structure a greater continuity than previously thought. Beyond x-ray crystallography of protein or DNA, membranes, chromosomes, and other subcellular structures were analyzed by a variety of such methods. Furthermore, new methods, such as fluorescence microscopy, optical and magnetic spectroscopies, or cryo-electron microscopy were developed; the latter has been in the limelight since the 2017 Nobel prize to Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank, and Richard Henderson (Grote 2019 ; Reinhardt 2017 ).
While this focus on structure has provided scholars with a useful vantage point, there are other avenues into the lesser-visited corners of the history of twentieth-century biology: these include studies of the prolific use of metaphors in the life sciences (besides the gene-as-code-metaphor); the history of lower-status fields, such as, nutrition science; and analyses of biological phenomena such as symbiotic relationships. The study of metaphorical language illuminates how historical actors understood and communicated conceptualizations of life as well as its experimentally known underpinnings (Keller 1995 ). The most commented-upon metaphor in molecular biology has been that of genetic material as “code” or “information,” perhaps demonstrated most comprehensively by Lily Kay’s Who Wrote the Book of Life? (2000). 4 But as Andrew Reynolds ( 2018 ) has shown, cell biologists drew on a range of other metaphors. Since the nineteenth century, cells have been cast variously as “organisms,” “citizens,” “machines,” and “factories” (Reynolds 2018 ; Nyhart and Vienne 2017 ). Gina Surita’s paper examined the metaphors used by biochemists to understand subcellular life. For example, the history of bioenergetics can be understood as the gradual articulation of the cell as a kind of “economy,” in which the universal energy “currency” of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) circulated in order to “pay” for various life-sustaining, energy-requiring metabolic reactions (Gina Surita, Ph.D. dissertation in progress). Drawing upon older, physiological invocations of the metaphor of the “animal economy,” twentieth-century bioenergeticists localized this notion of a vital economy to the cell, where, incidentally, the vast majority of energy exchanges were thought to take place in the cell cytoplasm, outside the nucleus.
Neglected approaches to “molecules” and “life” also come into view when historians survey low-status areas of research. Nutrition is especially important in this regard—the association of life with chemical transformation and metabolism runs from nineteenth-century animal economy right through the industrialization of food production in the twentieth century (Kamminga and Cunningham 1995 ; Stoff 2012 ). Following the researchers who determined basic nutritional requirements for humans, animals, and plants reveals a bundle of practical ties between molecular analysis and agriculture (Kollmer 2020 ). As Lisa Onaga ( 2021 ) shows, the biochemical study of the nutritional requirements of silkworms in Japan grew in the 1930s as an outcome of falling silk prices in the country. Scientists in Japan began to investigate how to supplement limited supplies of mulberry leaves with nutrient extracts of mulberry and soybeans to feed silkworms. At the same time, many farmers converted mulberry acreage to other crops and many others emigrated to the puppet-state of Manchuria to work on soybean plantations. The manufacture of molecularly-formulated artificial silkworm feed involved chemical studies of nutritional factors responsible for physiological feeding behaviors of silkworms, and contributed to the broader history of making artificial media for cultivating laboratory organisms.
Historians of biology have also begun analyzing how theories of metabolism fed into the development of chemically-defined media and animal feed (Landecker 2016a , 2019 ). These histories connect to the vibrant literature on model organisms, with its focus on how animal and plant systems serve as laboratory exemplars for understanding life, and they also reflect more recent attention to scientific infrastructures as well as issues of animal welfare. 5 For example, scholars involved in the Animal Research Nexus, a 5-year, Wellcome Trust-funded collaborative project in the UK, have been undertaking an interdisciplinary and reflexive examination of how laboratory biomedical researchers implement animal models while weighing matters of protecting and promoting both human health and animal welfare (Friese 2018 ; Davies et al. 2020 ). These inquiries dovetail with what could be called the molecularlization of agriculture and animal husbandry. Be they mice or sheep, twentieth-century investigations of molecular life processes in agriculture and biomedical settings relied on certain configurations of infrastructure, finance, and labor (García-Sancho and Myelnikov 2019 ).
One of the limitations of earlier studies of molecular biology has had to do with how sociocultural, political, and economic dimensions were brought into the narratives as a consequence of how those studies were attuned primarily to molecular biological narratives. Dominic Berry’s work on synthetic biology illustrates a newer approach to integrating the history of molecular biology with histories of technology and business. By using material and discursive analysis to study how objects, institutions, machines, journals, companies, human actors, and molecules related to other, he ascertains the significance of multiple meanings of “making” DNA. His strategy to locate a lesser-known, engineering-centered narrative serves to avoid uncritically reproducing the sanctity of DNA (Berry 2019 ). Such cognizance also works against the commonplace narrative that the commercialization of biology mainly concerns biotechnology since the 1980s. Historical research emerging from collaborative projects such as “Organisms and Us” at the University of Adelaide highlights how organisms of longstanding commercial relevance have been gaining scientific attention while the molecular pathways of organisms adapted to extreme environmental conditions have offered strategic biological appeal to scientists (Dietrich et al. 2020 ; Green et al. 2018 ). 6
The food and agriculture aspects of molecular biology have also given rise to discussions about molecularization as a strategy within Science & Technology Studies (STS) that advocates for greater attention to key molecules as regulators. Aligned with these calls for diversification of which objects count as historically relevant agents, Sarah E. Tracy has examined research that aimed to measure the effects of the flavor chemical monosodium glutamate (MSG). While glutamates are naturally occurring compounds, they are also common food additives, and their effects have been a source of controversy since the late-1960s. Tracy’s paper pointed to the striking compartmentalization of research on MSG. On the one hand, diabetes researchers have relied upon the obesogenic effect of large doses of MSG upon newborn mice. On the other hand, food scientists have pursued the potentially advantageous appetitive and digestive effects of MSG, based on findings from adult rodent models (Tracy and Landecker, forthcoming). Key connections between the flavor industry’s objectives and the risk of metabolic disorder due to food additives have been overlooked as a result of the compartmentalization of research and the complexity (e.g., the developmental and species variability) of glutamate’s bioactivity (Tracy 2018 , 2019 ). As Tracy remarked, recent attention in biomedicine to metabolic disorder illustrates that genes are not the only informational actors in the body (Landecker 2011 , 2016b ). 7
The effects of molecules like glutamate in rodent studies of digestion and metabolism point us to emergent historical and philosophical debates on how to study so-called “postgenomic” biology. The epigenetic processes that inform holobiontic relationships in organisms have generated much attention that have called into question not just the stability of DNA but the notion of the organism itself (Dupré and O’Malley 2013 ; Baedke et al. 2020 ). 8 Feminist scholars of bioscience, for instance, have suggested including the metabolic contributions of bacteria to the biological processes of other organisms, including humans, in order to recognize the historical roles of bacteria in scientific knowledge production (Roy 2018 ). Furthermore, studies of social epigenetics linked to diet and analyzed relative to disease susceptibility have injected scholarship with new evidence that affords the articulation of relational ideas of race, environment, and society (Baedke and Nieves Delgado 2019 ). Molecular-scale understandings of metabolism also help broaden our historical perspective into the historical sciences. Disciplines like zooarchaeology are increasingly building context- and actor-dense reconstructions of the evolution of humans, the animals they have depended upon (for nourishment, clothing, tools, and labor), and the microbiota hosted by them both. New fields like bioarchaeogenetics have sought to understand the relationships among animals, plants, and microorganisms from micro- to macro-scales by integrating genomic and proteomic diagnostic tools into existing methods in biology and ethnography (Sykes 2014 ; Hendy et al. 2018 ). 9 Historians of the life sciences face a special responsibility to interrogate how such technologies are used to articulate longue durée bioarchaeological narratives, even as we are called upon to contribute to this new and exciting area of scholarship.
In various ways, the recent scholarship we highlight illustrates the importance of the physical sciences, and especially chemistry, to biology. By contrast, conventional accounts attribute the origins of molecular biology to physicists who turned their attention to solving the secret of life, especially after the devastating use of atomic bombs at the end of World War II. Attesting the critical role of physicists was always partisan, and even though Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins certainly read and were inspired by Schrödinger’s What is Life? (Rasmussen 1997b ), they came away with different conceptions of how biology and physics ought to engage each with other. Although this scholarship illustrates the enduring importance of the physical sciences to biology, we also want to highlight that we are defining “the physical sciences” much more broadly than most older histories of molecular biology did: we understand the physical sciences to include the chemical and material sciences as well. In this we are following a similar shift happening in other areas of the history of physics more broadly: For example, Schwartz ( 2004 , 2008 ) has shown how the central role of chemists in Manhattan Project was marginalized by a combination of the project's secrecy and post-Hiroshima public relations, while Joe Martin ( 2018 ) has shown how solid state physicists and materials scientists navigated the shifting divide between physics and chemistry after World War II. By contrast, the narrative of physicists revolutionizing biology after reading Schrödinger and in the aftermath of Hiroshima was a mythology that drew a bright line between a valorized “pure” atomic or quantum physics and an impure “applied” or industrial physics and chemistry (Delbrück 2007 ; Reinhardt 2018 ). In fact, the influx of physical scientists into biology in the twentieth century was always as much from chemistry as physics, and it has long been noted that the adoption of tools and approaches from the physical sciences by biologists themselves also heavily tilted towards chemistry (Kohler 1976 ; Abir-Am 1982 ; Keller 1990 ; Kay 1993 ; Deichmann 2007 ). 10 More than two decades ago, Rasmussen ( 1997b ) persuasively argued that biologists pulled physics in as much as physicists pushed into biology; in some cases, the physics involved had turned out to be so esoteric and strange that historians and philosophers have struggled to make sense of it (Sloan and Fogel 2011 ). Paying attention to practice rather than rhetoric in biology brings into view chemical tools, techniques, and approaches, as well as those from physics that are not prominent in the historiography, such as the solid-state physics, surface science, and microstructural studies (Martin 2018 ).
Biologists often turn to chemistry for very pragmatic reasons. As Angela Creager ( 2017 ) observed in an essay on her “chemical reaction” to this historiography, when biologists handle, purify, stabilize, and analyze the stuff of living organisms they generally find themselves doing chemistry—even when they don’t remark on this in their publications. This insight seems especially apt for the other quite variegated cases that composed our panel. Not all of these papers were about biochemistry, but even colloidal chemistry made an appearance in the session, and twentieth-century nutritional studies relied heavily on analytical chemistry (on organic chemistry in hormone, vitamin, and enzyme studies, see e.g. Stoff 2012 ; Schürch 2017 ).
Earlier historical works in the field included a great deal of chemistry but did not always emphasize it. Take, for instance, the profound historical studies of virus research, structural biology of DNA and proteins at Cambridge, or protein synthesis published around the millennial heyday of the Human Genome Project (Creager 2002 ; de Chadarevian 2002 ; Rheinberger 1997 ), which show how thinking in terms of code and information has always been intertwined with material, chemical analyses, especially when it comes to hands-on laboratory practice. The attention to chemical thinking and working is even more prominent in literature from before this period, such as work on physiology and biochemistry by Holmes ( 1974 ) or Robert Kohler ( 1982 ). Together with new interest in materials and metabolism (Landecker 2011 , 2019 ), chemistry has become an unintended beneficiary of recent historiographical developments. This aligns with Creager ( 2017 ), who observes that focusing on materials-centered research challenges a strong divide between biology and chemistry. 11 In this sense, the recurrent importance of structures in the papers by our panelists reflects more than acknowledging the essential chemical toolbox. That said, the focus on structures also closes the loop with respect to the historiography of molecular biology and physics that we mentioned at the outset, by making the chemistry in the “structural school” of molecular biology more visible (Kendrew 1967 ).
In the historiography of molecular structural research there is much to be done, if only to gain a firmer grasp of the sheer extent of molecularization: It was not only DNA and globular proteins whose structures were resolved down to the atomic level to such great fanfare. For example, as Karl Matlin ( 2016 ) has recently shown, theories of the structure of mitochondria were essential in deciphering the spatially complex synthesis of ATP. Similar studies have yet to be done on the history of transport theories, chloroplasts and related plant plastids, the cytoskeleton, etc. Far from merely cataloging the histories of different structures, such studies can illustrate the diverse ways in which theories of structure and theories of physiological or biochemical function have been forged. After all, every living thing, every part of every living thing, and every derivative of every living process can be said to be ultimately made of molecules! To what extent this brings us full circle back to the problem of a definition of molecular biology highlighted by Morange is a question we do not want to resolve here. Our point is that we believe our vista of the molecular life sciences must be broadened to accurately capture the history of twentieth century biology.
As some of our contributors made clear, rethinking molecular biology’s history is about more than the borders with the physical sciences or the importance of heredity. Much new work is looking closely at research previously deemed “old-fashioned” or marginal—in part because the now seemingly central problems of (largely genetic) data, computing, or even machine learning in biology have achieved a significant degree of abstraction and independence from the material problems that historically occupied molecular biologists. As Soraya de Chadarevian asked off-handedly during the session, “Is this because genomics is no longer a chemistry-adjacent science?” Additional questions raised by the audience highlighted interests and concerns about the intersections between molecular biology and industry. We believe these types of questions and discussions are neither features limited to our panel nor circumstantial, but indicate broader shifts afoot. 12 Personalized medicine, nutrition, genetics, animal science, even cosmetics, are back in view (e.g. Boniolo and Nathan 2017 ). The efforts in several quarters to better understand feeding, whether of silkworms, cells, or people, are especially striking (Landecker 2016a ).
The new attention to lower-status fields can also help make visible scientists of different socioeconomic or educational backgrounds, and from underrepresented groups, genders, and ethnicities in the doing of science, including molecular biology. The foregrounding of marginalized actors, be they women, persons of color, or scientists from the Global South, can help diversify the curricula that is used to teach about the history and philosophy of the life sciences to new generations and thus impact whose histories are included and how those histories are remembered (Spanier 1995 ; Wailoo 2001 ; Wailoo and Pemberton 2006 ; Zulueta 2009 ; Hartley and Tansey 2015 ; Onaga 2014 ; Jiang and Stevens 2015 ; Nelson 2016a ). 13 Attention to the subordination that is associated with scut work may help us understand the gendered dimension of categorizing “ideal” scientists as those who work with their minds, not their bodies. Molecular equivalents of this gendered division of labor abound; as Hannah Landecker ( 2013 , p. 501) has observed, the “housekeeping” functions of the cell, often used to describe the various processes associated with cellular metabolism, have long been demarcated from and seen as subsidiary to the “executive” genetic functions of the cell. 14 Overcoming these norms takes deliberate attention. Much as historians of technology have highlighted women in computing (e.g., Hicks 2018 ), it is necessary to recognize the names and faces of those women who have worked in molecular biology, from Margaret O. Dayhoff and her work on computational sequencing (Strasser 2010 ) to technicians and postdoctoral fellows (e.g., Martha Chase and Susan Berget) who contributed to path-breaking laboratory experiments. Detailed recognition of these individuals alongside women scientists like Esther Lederberg, June Almeida, Marie Maynard Daly, Mildred Cohn, Louise Chow, Susan Lindquist, Tu Youyou, Carol Greider, and Elizabeth Blackburn, to name a few, can thus draw out the harder realities of where the molecular labor resides in biology. This, in turn, can allow us to map the intellectual power dynamics among many more players in just as many neglected corners of science.
Since the development of high-throughput genome sequencing in 2006, scientists have been increasingly doing cutting-edge biology in silico, relegating the bench to background labor (Stevens 2013 ; Roosth 2017 ). Looking back, somewhere in between the characterization of DNA and in silico biology, there was a great deal of laborious, dirty—and at times dangerous—wet lab research that is easily forgotten next to burnished double helices and computers. Equally invisible are the geographies and labor involved in procuring biological material used in research, for example, the viscera of pork from industrial farms, or the re-using of kitchen waste (Blanchette 2020 ; Ibáñez Martín and de Laet 2018 ). These issues of life and labor are the other side of the coin to philosophical questions that have arisen about how biology as data, models, and changing norms of experimentation give rise to personalized medicine and the associated problems that can ensue (Ratti 2020 ; Green et al. 2019 ). The material work, due to its often idiosyncratic and sometimes personal character linked to specific availabilities, skills, equipment or traditions, also helps to further trace the “power of place,” such as by research carried out in very specific labs or beyond them, in companies, hospitals, or the field, and take into account the impact of the economic and political conditions of the molecular life sciences (Fischer 2013 ; Curry 2014 ; Santesmases and Suárez Diáz 2015 ). In addition to the fact that the landscape of the history of molecular biology is more diverse and messier than previously imagined, some fellow scholars are venturing beyond its marked paths altogether. To be sure, much of the terrain remains unmapped, but this suite of papers provided a few snapshots of the vistas for other scholars interested in how scientists sought to relate molecules and life in the twentieth century.
We thank Sabina Leonelli and two anonymous referees for their insightful comments. Şahin Balur and Katharina Hillermann are thanked for their assistance with the bibliography.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
1 Excellent work on this point exists already (e.g., Abir-Am 1992 ; de Chadarevian and Gaudillière 1996 ; de Chadarevian and Kamminga 1998 ); de Chadarevian and Rheinberger 2009 ).
2 See Morange ( 2020 , pp 1–8; 13–22; 369–386).
3 For example, tools from the physical sciences used to develop the Tiselius electrophoresis apparatus not only separated proteins within a mixture, but enabled their photographic visualization. See Kay ( 1988 ).
4 For a different perspective on the “Book of Life Metaphor,” see Brandt ( 2005 ).
5 For key examples of recent and established model organisms literature, see Kohler ( 1994 ), Rader ( 2004 ), Endersby (2007), Ankeny ( 2010 ), Leonelli and Ankeny ( 2013 ), Ankeny and Leonelli ( 2019 ). On animal welfare, see Nelson ( 2016b ).
6 The project investigators are Rachel Ankeny, Sabina Leonelli, and Michael Dietrich. See https://arts.adelaide.edu.au/organisms-and-us/ .
7 For related discussion, see Oudshoorn ( 1990 ), Burian ( 1996 ).
8 The German Research Foundation (DFG)-funded research group Return of the Organism (PI: Jan Baedke) at Ruhr University Bochum investigates an array of questions surrounding organisms known at their genomic levels by bringing philosophical, historical, and social and anthropological methods into conversation. https://rotorub.wordpress.com/ .
9 The Proteins and Fibers working group at the MPIWG, including our co-authors Lisa Onaga, Daniel Liu, and Soraya de Chadarevian, has been examining the historical implementation of molecular biology and chemistry in interdisciplinary scientific fields that assay samples derived from animal materials and body parts (e.g., teeth, bones, hides). Historical reconstruction of the science contributing to “textbook” cases of gene-culture co-evolution such as lactase persistence is, for example, facilitated by analyzing how changing suites of methods and technique came to include microbial information. See https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/research/projects/proteins-and-fibers-scaffolding-history-molecular-signatures .
10 The role of the Rockefeller Foundation, and especially Warren Weaver, in encouraging interdisciplinary research that brought the between the physical and life sciences—which really meant involved bringing the former into the latter—has been well-documented and critiqued since Robert Kohler’s classic 1976 article on Weaver.
11 Reinhardt ( 2018 ) makes this point more broadly for how a materials-based approach to history shows that much of modern science is saturated with chemistry, even when it is not explicitly connected with that discipline.
12 The 2019 formation of the Biological Engineering Collaboratory, spearheaded by Dominic Berry, Janella Baxter, and Robert Smith, for instance, has established a network of scholars guided by a mission to encourage integrative studies of biology and technology: https://www.bioengcoll.org/ .
13 This concern is revisited in “Statement on Racialized Violence and Resources,” HSS Graduate and Early Career Caucus (blog), July 13, 2020, https://hssgecc.wordpress.com/statement-on-racialized-violence/ . It lays out “a vision of a diverse profession, which includes not only promoting the voices and scholarship of more Black historians of science, but also calling on white and non-black historians of science to recognize their own privilege.” Within the history of the molecular life sciences, recognizing that dominant historical narrative accounts of DNA have routinely elided scientists of color (be they students, technicians, or full professors) will be a key strategy toward the articulation of underknown histories.
14 This contrasts nicely with Evelyn Fox Keller’s analysis of “master molecule” narratives in descriptions of gene action, in which executive metaphors are prominent (Keller 1995 ).
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mathias Grote, Email: [email protected] .
Lisa Onaga, Email: ed.gpm.nilreb-gwipm@aganol .
Angela N. H. Creager, Email: ude.notecnirp@regaerc .
Soraya de Chadarevian, Email: ude.alcu.yrotsih@naiveradahc .
Daniel Liu, Email: ten.uil-nad@nad .
Gina Surita, Email: ude.notecnirp@atirusg .
Sarah E. Tracy, Email: moc.liamg@dhpimamu .
Personal Statements
University Interviews
Studying Abroad
Guide to GCSE Results Day
Finding a job after school or college
Retaking GCSEs
Choosing GCSE Subjects
Post-GCSE Options
GCSE Work Experience
GCSE Revision Tips
Why take an Apprenticeship?
Applying for an Apprenticeship
Apprenticeships Interviews
Apprenticeship Wage
Engineering Apprenticeships
What is an Apprenticeship?
Choosing an Apprenticeship
Real Life Apprentices
Degree Apprenticeships
Higher Apprenticeships
A Level Results Day 2024
AS Levels 2024
Clearing Guide 2024
Applying to University
SQA Results Day Guide 2024
BTEC Results Day Guide
Vocational Qualifications Guide
Sixth Form or College
International Baccalaureate
Post 18 options
Finding a Job
Should I take a Gap Year?
Travel Planning
Volunteering
Gap Year Blogs
Applying to Oxbridge
Applying to US Universities
Choosing a Degree
Choosing a University or College
Personal Statement Editing and Review Service
Guide to Freshers' Week
Student Guides
Student Cooking
Student Blogs
Personal Statement Examples
Writing Your Personal Statement
Personal Statement Length Checker
Personal Statement Examples By University
Job Interviews
Types of Postgraduate Course
Writing a Postgraduate Personal Statement
Postgraduate Funding
Postgraduate Study
Internships
Choosing A College
Ivy League Universities
Common App Essay Examples
Universal College Application Guide
How To Write A College Admissions Essay
College Rankings
Admissions Tests
Fees & Funding
Scholarships
Budgeting For College
Online Degree
Platinum Express Editing and Review Service
Gold Editing and Review Service
Silver Express Editing and Review Service
UCAS Personal Statement Editing and Review Service
Oxbridge Personal Statement Editing and Review Service
Postgraduate Personal Statement Editing and Review Service
Your biology personal statement should tell the university all about your strengths, skills, experience and career plans.
It should also convey your enthusiasm for the subject, and what aspects of it you enjoy and why.
It’s a good idea to start your statement with why you want to study biology at university.
Try to talk about what drew you to biology initially - was it a childhood experience, or were you inspired by a family member or a television documentary? Pin this down if you can, as admissions tutors always want to know about your motivations for wanting to study their subject.
Make sure you back up everything with examples, as you need to convince the university that you they should offer you a place on their biology degree over anyone else.
A great biology personal statement should be written clearly and concisely, with a good introduction, middle, and a conclusion. After all, your statement has to stand out from the crowd if your UCAS application is going to be successful.
For inspiration on how to write your own unique statement, take a look at some of our engineering personal statement examples above, as well as our collection of top rated personal statement examples .
It’s important to include skills and experience from all areas of your life and try to relate them to hobbies or extracurricular activities if they helped you to build on certain strengths.
Think about how any work experience you have completed might be useful in your degree, e.g. what skills did you learn? were there any parts of it you particularly enjoyed? if so, why?
Make sure you include everything that is relevant to your course, which means you may want to leave off your Grade 6 in piano, or your swimming certificates.
University admissions tutors want to know what you can bring to their department and what value you can add, so every sentence of your personal statement needs to earn its place.
You need to sell yourself as a well-rounded individual in terms of academic knowledge, work experience and extracurricular activities in order to have a chance of being successful with your biology UCAS application (although this doesn't mean lying or embellishing the truth!).
For more help and advice on what to write in your biology personal statement, please see:
Getting into ecology.
Find out more
Home — Essay Samples — Education — Academic Interests — Why I Choose Biochemistry Major: the Path Forward
About this sample
Words: 597 |
Published: Sep 5, 2023
Words: 597 | Page: 1 | 3 min read
The nexus of curiosity and complexity, bridging academia and aspirations, shaping a vision for the future.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:
Let us write you an essay from scratch
Get high-quality help
Dr Jacklynne
Verified writer
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
1 pages / 551 words
1 pages / 769 words
1 pages / 605 words
2 pages / 883 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
On 31st August 2016, I successfully completed my undergraduate studies in Civil Engineering from University of South Asia Lahore, Pakistan with a CGPA of 2.86. During my undergraduate studies I have been a brilliant student. I [...]
The idea of studying humans’ mind and behavior has drawn all of my academic interests to psychology major. The area of this scientific field are varies, and one of them which interested me the most is counseling psychology. In [...]
Brief introduction of the author Background in a lower-class family and education Completed Bachelor of Science in Computer Science Worked as an IT Instructor in vocational training institutes Currently [...]
Delving into the heart of why I want to be a mental health counselor is an extension of my educational journey, which includes an impending graduation on December 15, 2018, with a Bachelor of General Studies. My academic [...]
Within the last 30 years, the world has undergone immense changes, from the fall of communism to the interlinking of countries through globalization. However, despite this, we still live in a world with remarkable deprivation, [...]
Money is powerful, and improper management of your finances can be detrimental. Witnessing the strain finances can put on lives sparked my curiosity into finance, because I wondered how not to end up in those circumstances. As I [...]
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
(26 reviews)
David W Ball, Cleveland State University
John W Hill, University of Wisconsin
Rhonda J Scott, Southern Adventist University
Copyright Year: 2011
ISBN 13: 9781453311097
Publisher: Saylor Foundation
Language: English
Conditions of use.
Learn more about reviews.
Reviewed by SATHIAMOORTHY BALASUBRAMANIAN, Chemistry FACULTY, Rochester Community & Technical College on 3/6/23
This text book is adequately comprehensive and covers all chapters of a GOB chemistry course. The content is well organized and explained clearly. Students need to review the practice questions for better grasp of concepts. read more
Comprehensiveness rating: 5 see less
This text book is adequately comprehensive and covers all chapters of a GOB chemistry course. The content is well organized and explained clearly. Students need to review the practice questions for better grasp of concepts.
Content Accuracy rating: 5
Mostly error free and accurate
Relevance/Longevity rating: 5
This text book is highly relevant for GOB course students who need to take this course for Nursing, dental hygiene and other programs.
Clarity rating: 5
Very clear and precise and written in a manner which is easily understood at student's level.
Consistency rating: 5
Consistent for all chapters.
Modularity rating: 5
Each chapter is divided into various sections based on "Learning Objective". Under each section, I like the skill building exercise and practice questions. This way the student can attain mastery in each topic by going through the skill building exercise and solving the practice questions.
Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 5
Well organized meeting the learning objectives of this course in each chapter.
Interface rating: 5
No issues. Easily able to toggle between various chapters, no distortion of diagrams or images.
Grammatical Errors rating: 5
Didn't come across significant grammatical errors
Cultural Relevance rating: 1
Not applicable
I will recommend this for students who need a text book to master topics of GOB. All the chapters which are part of GOB course curriculum are covered in a an easy to understand manner. The application of concepts can be learnt by doing the practice questions under each learning objective. Highly recommended!
Reviewed by Alan Rowe, Adjunct Professor of Chemistry, Tidewater Community College on 7/1/22
Very comprehensive--- Currently pre-Nursing studetns are only required to take the first part of the 2 semester GOB course so only 1/2 of ths text would be used in that course. read more
Comprehensiveness rating: 4 see less
Very comprehensive--- Currently pre-Nursing studetns are only required to take the first part of the 2 semester GOB course so only 1/2 of ths text would be used in that course.
Very nice treatment of chemical concepts at an approprite level
Relevance/Longevity rating: 4
Text is relevant , but It would really benefit from real world examples of the chemical concepts covered, especially those related to healthh care
Good clarity- concise but not overly so
Cosistent form chapter to chapter
Modularity rating: 4
Most chemistry text for GOB are similar-- this one follows that pattern
The material is organized in the manner that I would like to present the information-- one concept follows the next almost seamlessly
no problems here
Seems to read very well using grammatical structure easy for the student to follow
Cultural Relevance rating: 5
no indication of any cultural references at all
The exercises with answers are helpful as well as those without the answers (in the chapter and at the end of chapater problems). Both could be assigned to the student, one for them to check and the ones without answers to see if the student really understands. The main weakness of the text seems to be not showing the specific work (units crossed out, etc) for numerical problems (unit conversions, stoichiometry problems, etc) Students really need those specific steps to help them build confidence towards attempting them themselves.
Reviewed by Nissa Garcia Ivers, Adjunct Chemistry Professor, Southwestern Oregon Community College on 1/28/22
The book is great for an introductory chemistry class - it covers all the necessary learning outcomes for my particular course. I would like to point out that perhaps for the Converting Units chapter, perhaps more examples showing explicitly how... read more
The book is great for an introductory chemistry class - it covers all the necessary learning outcomes for my particular course. I would like to point out that perhaps for the Converting Units chapter, perhaps more examples showing explicitly how units cancel would be much more helpful for instructors.
I have not so far seen any errors in this text.
The text is matter of fact, so it will withstand the test of time.
Clarity rating: 4
The book is clear and concise, however, I think that it can benefit using more visual aids/illustrations for more visual learners. The addition of visual aids can contribute to its clarity.
The book is consistent in language and style, as well as the format. It is consistent in the presence of end of chapter material, which I particularly like since it summarizes each chapter nicely.
Modularity rating: 3
It would help if this textbook was customizable, however, this is easily addressed by assigning specific chapter readings and pages to students.
I like the sequence of the book - the order is how I normally would teach an intro to chemistry class from chapters 1-6, after which I would go to chapters 9-10.
Interface rating: 3
The navigation of the online book is ok, but I wish that the table of contents would be on the side, and it can stay on display as I click through chapters. I wish there were more illustrations and more visual examples, which would really improve on this book , and show more work for the problem solving aspect, such as the stoichiometry part and calculating concentrations and converting units, in addition to mentioning the steps, which it already does.
I have not found any grammatical errors
The text is matter of fact, so I didn't see any cultural issues with this book
Reviewed by Marissa Shepherd, Instructor, Rogue Community College on 1/13/21
I felt like this book is a basic outline of a GOB course, but felt lacking in many areas. This might be appropriate if you were covering the entire book in one quarter, but not suitable for a full year GOB series. Generally the gen chem section... read more
Comprehensiveness rating: 3 see less
I felt like this book is a basic outline of a GOB course, but felt lacking in many areas. This might be appropriate if you were covering the entire book in one quarter, but not suitable for a full year GOB series. Generally the gen chem section was good, but was shockingly sparse in gas laws.
Seems accurate, but could use more examples especially of more difficult concepts.
I did like the intro stories in the beginning of each chapter which also helps relate the material, but it needs more pictures to be engaging.
Clarity rating: 3
The writing is clear, but a lack of formatting and pictures makes the textbook feel like a huge wall of text which will be difficult for students.
Consistency rating: 4
Very consistent with itself.
Modularity rating: 2
Unfortunately, this portion hurts the textbook the most. The pictures are extremely small compared to the text and very few and far between. This leaves the feeling of a huge wall of text. Formulas and chemical expressions are given in the same font as the main body which exacerbates the issue.
Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 3
Generally follows the expected "GOB" series course material. There are a few sections that are lumped together and it is lacking in the biochemistry section.
Very small images especially in the biochem section detract from the experience and make it difficult to comprehend the material.
Grammar is good
Good references!
I hope this book will be developed more. I have been searching for a good open source GOB replacement textbook, but this has been shockingly difficult to find. More engaging and better thought out visuals will help the book. It also needs more references in the back, standard tables.
Reviewed by Mary Coville, Adjunct Instructor, Lane Community College on 8/26/20
There is no glossary or index and the text could really use one. An enormous amount of material is covered, and if a student needs to review something from earlier or look up a definition, the chapter sub-headings aren’t sufficient. The book... read more
There is no glossary or index and the text could really use one. An enormous amount of material is covered, and if a student needs to review something from earlier or look up a definition, the chapter sub-headings aren’t sufficient. The book could also use a more extensive appendix that includes all the tables that normally appear inside the front and back covers of a physical textbook – table of polyatomic ions, list of common ions, conversion factors, etc. Most subjects are covered appropriately but more coverage could be given to chemical equilibrium. Also, condensation and hydrolysis reactions could be more effectively emphasized.
I found no glaring errors.
The book was written before the periodic table was filled in. Also, I would like to see an update in the next year or so that includes a description of SARS-COV-2 in the section on viruses. There is currently a description of HIV and the drugs used to treat it in the virus section, and that probably needs to be updated.
The text is written in simple language appropriate for beginning college students including English language learners.
I found no problems with consistency.
I did not like that the intro to organic compounds, including describing functional groups, occurs in chapter 4: covalent bonding. Then in chapter 12, where organic chemistry really begins in earnest, the authors refer back to chapter 4.
Other than putting the intro to organic compounds in chapter 4, the organization is good.
Interface rating: 4
Some figures were missing in the online version. My browser prevented me from accessing the PDF version. I liked that there was a choice of reading the entire chapter continuously or proceeding through it section by section.
I found no grammatical errors.
The text is not culturally insensitive or offensive, but there is little cultural diversity in the examples. The main text focuses on the science. Inset “career focus” boxes use gender neutral pronouns, although for “genetics counselor” a photograph is included where the counselor is a white woman and her client appears to be a woman of color. There are only a few depictions of people and they are of dead white scientists: Linus Pauling, John Dalton, William Morton (dentist to first use diethyl ether as a general anesthetic).
Reviewed by Danna Sharp, Lecturer, Shenandoah University on 6/18/20
This is a standard text for a course intended as an introduction to chemistry, organic, and biochemistry for non-majors. I do feel it could be improved by additional figures and images to explain concepts. It definitely lacked in this. A few... read more
This is a standard text for a course intended as an introduction to chemistry, organic, and biochemistry for non-majors. I do feel it could be improved by additional figures and images to explain concepts. It definitely lacked in this.
A few things I noticed: -the text does not teach students how to draw covalently bonded lewis structures (it does teach ionic) -drug kinetics are not mentioned in the organic/biochem section -quantum description of atoms does not explain the electron jump in the d orbitals -no arrow pushing is used in the organic section and students are required to memorize reactants and products instead
However, all of these things may be fine depending on the course. Other than the omission of lewis structures, I found this text adequate but high on the memorization requirements in the organic and biochem sections.
The book was accurate. Most of the issues I felt came from issues of omission. This happened by not going into more depth on explanations of topics to help improve student comprehension instead of focusing on memorization based learning.
This again may be fine depending on your course.
I liked the examples relating chemistry to the real world at the beginning of each chapter often having a medical focus. As many students who take courses like this are in medical related fields, I find it very helpful.
This book reads like a dense workbook. It has very good definitions of terms and lots of practice problems with solutions, however, it lacks images and figures to help describe concepts and ideas. So if your students need a lot of practice problems, and your class is supplemented with a lecture with lots of images to help the students visualize concepts, this would be an ideal text. It is also intended for non-majors.
Book was very consistent and easy to locate content. A lot of problems are included in the text and nearly all had solutions. So it provides a lot of practice for students.
The text was very easy to read. It was also very concise which I appreciated. Very good definitions!
Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 4
I felt this text was very well organized. Everything was where it was supposed to be and the material covered is standard for what is expected in a non-majors course.
The text had no interface issues I noticed.
No Grammatical Errors that I saw. Sometimes it would gloss over or skip more complex explanations of topics.
The text was not culturally insensitive in any way.
In summary, this is a standard text for a course intended as an introduction to chemistry, organic, and biochemistry for non-majors. I do feel it could be improved by additional figures and images to explain concepts. It definitely lacked in this.
I would also appreciate a lessened focus on memorization in the organic and biochemistry portions (personal preference). Nearly all practice questions and topics were based on memorization. The reason as to why certain chemical and biochemical reactions happen was not included. There was a good focus on applications in the organic and biochemistry sections however.
In my opinion, the best parts of the text were how concise and clear the definitions were and how all of the problems had solutions for the students to check their work with.
Reviewed by Soumya Bhattacharya, Assistant professor, University of Providence on 2/28/20
The book is quite comprehensive. Given that this course can be either 2 semesters (16 week each) or 1 semester (8 weeks each module General + Organic & Biochemistry), the book is detailed enough in materials presented to be adapted for an... read more
The book is quite comprehensive. Given that this course can be either 2 semesters (16 week each) or 1 semester (8 weeks each module General + Organic & Biochemistry), the book is detailed enough in materials presented to be adapted for an abridged, more focused direction.
The informations are accurate and concise for the course the book is intended for.
The health science references were well placed. Given that the majority of the readers of this kind of textbook will be allied health science majors, the examples and extrapolations are quite relevant.
The language is simple and lucid. The technical terms are both defined and explained with adequate examples.
The organization of the chapters are pretty standard. For this kind of a textbook, atoms first approach suits better and that is how exactly the book is laid out.
Interface rating: 2
The formatting requires a lot of work. The figure headings and the actual figures must be in the same page. The subheadings or the headings with their accompanying texts should have been tried to be kept in one page, wherever possible. This book should have been under the scanner of a compositor for much better visual appeal. Use or certain colors (like orange) was a disaster. It actually distracted the reader and made it harder to focus. The organization will tremendously enhance the learning and teaching experiences.
Grammatical Errors rating: 4
Cultural Relevance rating: 4
Reviewed by Chandra Kunapareddy Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Chemistry, Blue Mountain Community College on 1/6/20
As the authors stated in the preface of this book, this book is ideal for the survey of the GOB chemistry full semester course. However considering I teach at an institution that teaches in quarters semester instead of a full semester, I need to... read more
As the authors stated in the preface of this book, this book is ideal for the survey of the GOB chemistry full semester course. However considering I teach at an institution that teaches in quarters semester instead of a full semester, I need to cut down on a couple of chapters and topics from this book to make it appropriate for my students. I do want to use this book for single quarters to teach general, organic and biological chemistry in separate quarters. I find that the general chemistry component is very comprehensive to teach in the one-quarter semester. However, the book went lighter in content for organic and biological chemistry. Which makes me need to look for supplemental content to make up for the needed content for the quarter semester for each of organic and biological section. I find that this book uses much fewer images than a regular textbook. It would be great if this book can add more images throughout the book to keep a student engaged.
I used this book for the introductory general chemistry one quarter and covered chapters from 1 to 11. I didn't find any inaccuracies with the text in these first 11 chapters. I also adopted this book for the survey of GOB chemistry class with selected topics and I find no issues so far.
This book does a good job of covering necessary basic topics to introduce chemistry for non-majors students. However, many of my students are non-chemistry majors and they always look for justification to learn any new chemistry concept. The book will look much more relevant for students if it includes a few more health-related applications for the major concepts.
This follows a pattern similar to any GOB textbook available in the market. So, it does have good clarity of chapters' progressions and the content discussed under each chapter.
The book is consistent in its style of presenting information in each chapter. Each chapter starts with an opening essay, followed by sub-sections that discusses that covers parts of the chapters in a progressive manner.
I like how this simplifies each topic by consistently presenting learning objectives, concept review exercises, answers, key takeaways, more examples, and answers before moving on to another topic in the same chapter.
No problems here. As I previously mentioned in the modularity section, the book is very organized and very easy to find the information especially if you use an online textbook. For my online chemistry class, I copy and paste the link of the specific chapters on the canvas shell page for my students to directly access it online.
I commend the author's effort to put together this book available in OpenStax mode. However, this book could use some formating help to make it more attractive for aspiring users. For example, it is uncommon for a textbook to left indent through the book instead of adjusting the sides. The book at times has less clarity element symbol. For example, for example, 5 on page 107 of the textbook has given mass and atomic number information of the elements Cl, I and other elements. The authors try to paste an image instead of using MS word to present this information, which leads to blurry images of the elements. It is still readable but it feels low clarity. I have observed these types of similar issues when the textbook presents problem-solving equations using conversion factors.
There are no obvious grammatical errors. The students in my class liked the way the book is written as it is very easy for them to read. For a professor who used publisher books in the previous years, this book might seem a little informal in writing. However, it doesn't bother me much, because as I won't require to read this as thoroughly as students since I am already familiar with the content over the years.
No issues here.
I commend the effort put in by the author to make this book available for free. Thank you on behalf of all the students who are using this book.
Reviewed by Adam Wenz, Associate Professor of Chemistry, Flathead Valley Community College & TRAILS on 11/27/19
The coverage of general chemistry topics in this text is very good considering the level of course for which this is intended. However, I feel that there are a couple of areas that could use improvement: The discussion of nuclear chemistry in... read more
The coverage of general chemistry topics in this text is very good considering the level of course for which this is intended. However, I feel that there are a couple of areas that could use improvement:
The discussion of nuclear chemistry in Chapter 11 does not cover electron capture, or positron emission. Not all texts of this type cover this information, but I feel it would be useful to do so.
Chemical equilibrium is minimally discussed, with no mention of Le Chatelier’s principle. There is no mention of chemical kinetics. I would prefer a basic chemistry textbook to at least cover these topics in a qualitative fashion, if nothing more.
Coverage of organic chemistry and biochemistry topics is very good, and is similar in scope to other GOB textbooks. I don’t have any suggestions for improvement on these topics.
On page 866, there is a discussion of D- vs. L- forms of carbohydrates; the structure of L-(-)-glyceraldehyde appears to have an error.
Few, if any, other errors were noted. Most other errors are likely artifacts from conversion to pdf format, as they involved mainly formatting issues in equations.
The content of a chemistry text at this level is unlikely to see drastic changes over time, with the exception of newer techniques and technologies seen in biochemistry. As such, I feel this book would not need updates very often.
Perhaps the periodic table given at the end of the text could be updated to be current. Based upon the information given, it appears to date from the late 2000’s.
The text is written very well. Topics are presented in a clear fashion. The text is written at a level appropriate for the intended audience. Flowcharts, photos, and figures are well-designed in general. Some tables (e.g. the amino acids table) could use reformatting for better clarity of the information contained therein.
Chapters are written and organized in a very consistent manner. Terminology is up to date and used consistently throughout the text.
Each chapter is broken up into sections, followed by a series of practice exercises. Some readers may find this distracting and choppy, but it is a matter of preference.
The chapters are organized in the order typically found in GOB type textbooks, which is just fine.
In-text exercises and end-of-chapter questions have the answers given immediately afterwards. I suggest moving the answers to another portion of the book (perhaps an appendix). This would improve student learning, in my opinion.
The pdf version of this book does not include a table of contents, nor does it include an index. This makes navigation to a particular topic more difficult unless you happen to know which chapter contains the desired material beforehand.
When the book was converted from online to pdf format, the embedded links within the text remain blue in color, suggesting that the links are still active. However, those links are all inactive. This could be remedied in a number of ways.
Other links are embedded in the text (such as those on page 479), and they are active. However, the links might need to be updated, as the material on those webpages does not fit with the context of where they are in the book itself.
Figures and tables, in general, seem to have retained their proper formatting during the conversion to pdf. They seem to be well thought out and convey their information well.
Mathematical formulas (such as those showing conversion factors) are not always consistently formatted…they appear as though they have been copied from one place to another, and appear blurry as a result. This may be an artifact of the conversion to pdf format.
I did not run across any errors in grammar.
I did not see any issues here.
Please note that this review is of the PDF version of this textbook. The online version of this text may not have as many formatting issues. Even though this text is listed as being intended for a one-semester GOB course, I feel it could also be modified for use in a two-semester GOB sequence. The first semester could cover the general chemistry topics, followed by the second semester being half organic chemistry and half biochemistry. This book should serve the intended audience well.
Reviewed by Andrew Bonham, Professor, Metropolitan State University of Denver on 7/16/19
This textbook addresses all the major topics that I would expect to see in a General, Organic, and biological Chemistry textbook. It could benefit from added material in the following areas: chemical reaction rates, organic molecule chirality,... read more
This textbook addresses all the major topics that I would expect to see in a General, Organic, and biological Chemistry textbook. It could benefit from added material in the following areas: chemical reaction rates, organic molecule chirality, and nutrition. The topic coverage compares favorably to other common textbooks used for these courses.
The content is very accurate, with very few errors in its treatment of the subject. More specifically, the content review exercises included with each section are salient and accurate, sometimes giving important context to the material that preceded them.
Relevance/Longevity rating: 3
Many chemical concepts are timeless, but particularly in biochemistry, the pace of advancement is very high. Some of the material related to biochemistry is already dated and should be updated with more modern techniques and examples. To be clear, nothing is inaccurate-- it’s simply not the ‘state of the art’ anymore, and it’s better to expose students to more up-to-date information. Particularly given that this textbook will be used in pre healthcare-focused careers, it’s important to supplement the text with examples of techniques that students are likely to encounter in their future careers.
This textbook does an excellent job of using short, direct language to express important concepts, avoiding jargon and speaking at the appropriate level for its audience. This is one of the great strengths of this textbook.
It is clear that this textbook originally had one author; it is very consistent and clear in its terminology and tone throughout.
This textbook is extremely modular and self-contained; each section stands on its own with internal introductions, concept reviews, exercises, and summaries. You could take any chapter and use it independently or interweave it with other resources.
This textbook follows a very common organizational pattern for General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry textbooks, making it easy to adapt for instructors used to other resources. Within each chapter, topics are presented in a logical manner and build appropriately in complexity.
The web interface of the book is clear, well-organized, and accessible. The PDF version has topics span pages without clear breaks for different topics at times, and could use effort at better interactive hyperlinking.
The text has some noticeable typos and formatting errors, but very few hinder comprehension. Core concepts are clearly presented, and the English style and tone is appropriate.
I did not observe any topics or discussions in the book that would be considered culturally offensive. For instance, its discussion of genetic diseases was very respectful.
This textbook is comprehensive and correct, but barebones. A concerted effort to add 3 to 5 additional exercises and challenge problems to each section of the book would be worthwhile and dramatically increase its impact.
Reviewed by Pratikkumar Rathod, Assistant Professor, LAGCC on 5/17/19
This GOB book is well-written for non-majors who required to learn basic chemistry in a semester. The topics in the book are adequately described without going into much details. The text provides good numbers of exercises relating to real-world... read more
This GOB book is well-written for non-majors who required to learn basic chemistry in a semester. The topics in the book are adequately described without going into much details. The text provides good numbers of exercises relating to real-world problems which I think is beneficial to the students to understand the relevance of the topics. The introduction of opening essays in the beginning of chapters is a great way to connect the relevance of the information in the chapters with real problems. There is no index or glossary.
Content Accuracy rating: 4
The content and the information provided in the book are accurate. However, I find quite a few space errors in the text, especially on page #141 (chapter summary section of Chapter-2). Besides answers of the exercise on the page #207 (problems- 5, 7, 9, 11) does not match with questions.
The chemistry content in this book should remain relevant for long period of time. It includes up to date information.
The book is written in an accessible way by keeping non-majors chemistry students in the mind. All terms are well-defined and explained in simple (yet scientific) language.
Each chapter in the book does follow a consistent pattern including Learning objectives, examples, skill-building exercises, concept review exercises and key takeaways. The text, font and language used throughout the book is uniform.
The sections and information provided in the book can easily be divided (into subsections or reading assignment) depending on course requirement.
The chapters in the book are written in well-organized and consistent manner. The flow of chapters in the book is logical.
The PDF version of the book offers poor interface. The lack of clickable links for tables and figures is the biggest negative. The resolution of formulas in the text as well as in the problems can be better.
The book has quite a few typos and space errors but not a major issue.
I did not find anything that might be considered as culturally offensive in the book.
Reviewed by Gregory Cornell, Adjunct Instructor, Southern University on 4/30/19
This GOB text delivers in providing just what the title denotes. In this era of having to cram two semesters of material into a one semester course, the text adequately provides basic level content. The text lacks an index and glossary. read more
This GOB text delivers in providing just what the title denotes. In this era of having to cram two semesters of material into a one semester course, the text adequately provides basic level content. The text lacks an index and glossary.
The text appears to be mostly accurate with minimal detection of errors.
In the last 13 years, I have had to utilize several GOB texts, as well as textbook written for non-science majors. I would definitely attest to its relevance. Some instructors might like to see more information provided in key areas, but overall, it follows the norm in up to date content.
I find this GOB text to be clear with concise step by step examples for students to follow.
This text shows consistency throughout in its progression of terms and concepts.
The text is presented clearly and concise in "bite-size chunks". Students are often intimidated by the subject name as well as the content. These compartmentalized smaller reading sections help students to master concepts before moving on to others too fast.
The organization of the topics in this text were mostly standard.
There were no distortion of images or confusing displays during the review of this text. The navigation capabilities are limited to scrolling only.
There were only a few grammatical errors detected during my review.
Cultural Relevance rating: 3
There were no cultural sensitivity issues detected during my review of this text, based on the lack of cultural material provided.
Reviewed by Kinesha Harris, Assistant Professor, Southern University on 4/29/19
The textbook provides adequate coverage of the topics that would be discussed in a one or two-semester introductory chemistry course for health science or other non-science majors. It presents topics with an appropriate level of discussion and... read more
The textbook provides adequate coverage of the topics that would be discussed in a one or two-semester introductory chemistry course for health science or other non-science majors. It presents topics with an appropriate level of discussion and provides real-world links to the topics discussed to make the material relevant to students. There is no glossary or index; however, there are bold-face terms throughout the text, which show definitions as screen tips.
The content reviewed in the textbook is accurate, error-free and unbiased.
The textbook contains up to date information and provides examples and additional information that cover scientific advances from the last decade.
The text is written in plain language, with content specific language as necessary. New technical or scientific terms are defined within the text as presented.
The textbook is consistent in layout and levels of content from chapter to chapter.
The content is divided into sections within each chapter, which facilitates reading and comprehending the material. Students can be assigned individual sections or groups of sections to read rather than the entire chapter at once. There are pre- and post-checks for each section and the sections reference appropriate material in other sections and chapters. However, the material easily can be reorganized if necessary.
The topics in the textbook are arranged in a logical manner, albeit slightly deviated from the common presentation of general chemistry topics, but pleasantly so. I believe the chosen organization groups all of the related materials and orders them in such a way as to allow the students to get a full understanding of the basic concepts and how they apply across the various types of matter.
There is an unusually high occurrence of broken or missing links to figures and other sections or chapters. There are missing figures and incorrectly placed figure labels. Additionally, the screen tips for the bold-face terms throughout the text show up at the top of the screen (beginning of chapter), instead of within the bounds of the paragraph where the term is located, and are usually out of screen view if you are anywhere beyond the first screen worth of text and graphics. These issues do not, however, take away from the presentation of the material as far as student understanding.
I did not notice any grammatical errors in the reviewed material.
There are no issues of cultural insensitivity or offensiveness with the textbook.
The textbook provides a good overview of general, organic and biological chemistry. It is not in-depth, but it provides enough information for an introduction to each of these areas of chemistry. I think the arrangement of the topics is beneficial and would be interested to know if students respond better to this presentation of material. The chapters could use a larger selection of problems in the End of Chapter Additional Exercises section and there are some interface issues; however, overall, I think this is a good book for general, organic and biochemistry courses.
Reviewed by Joachim Bowles, Part-time Instructor - Chemistry, Lane Community College on 12/17/18
Has more depth than necessary for my survey course when it comes to general chemistry and adequately covers organic and biochemistry topics. read more
Has more depth than necessary for my survey course when it comes to general chemistry and adequately covers organic and biochemistry topics.
No errors noticed.
While the understanding of the minute details of biochemistry are often changing, this book does a good job of keeping more of an overview on these topics to maintain relevance.
The overall tone is accessible, but it would be nice if there were more sections/examples that demonstrated the topics being applied to real world problems.
Formatting and tone remain consistent throughout the book.
Topics are broken into logical chapters, which in turn have numbered sections. Some of these chapter sections can run long, so having a method to break them up further could be useful.
Builds from gen chem topics to organic and finally to biochem.
Distortion on images for chemical equations and molecular structures. Its not book breaking, but some of these are quite fuzzy.
No grammatical errors noticed.
Overall applications/examples lacking, which carries over to inclusivity as well.
Overall the book presents the topics I need for my course, but the presentation is somewhat bare bones as there could be more of an emphasis on applications (and maybe some historical context for topics like atomic structure). Also, visually some improvements could be made as the figures are often blurry and there's a periodic table at the end that is oddly formatted across two pages.
Reviewed by Lisa Sharpe Elles, Assistant Teaching Professor, University of Kansas on 12/15/18
This textbook is a great one-semester overview of general, organic, and biochemistry for students needing an introduction to chemistry, such as pre-nursing or exercise science students. There is enough information for students to get a good, basic... read more
This textbook is a great one-semester overview of general, organic, and biochemistry for students needing an introduction to chemistry, such as pre-nursing or exercise science students. There is enough information for students to get a good, basic foundation to chemistry in a short period of time without getting bogged down in too many details. There is no stand alone index or glossary but within the text there are definitions of bolded and underlined words if you hover over them with the mouse.
There are no errors other than occasional missed spaces throughout the pdf version. A minor annoyance is that the colors of the nucleus and electrons switch between chapter 2 and 4, which could be confusing to students that pay attention to details.
For the most part, this book is relevant and up-to-date. This chemistry content in this textbook is straightforward and presented in a very practical order that can be adapted (added to) easily when updates become necessary. However, some of the connections to health and chapter introductions will need updates over time to keep up with changes in the health professions. The organic naming section still uses the older nomenclature however, this is common among all equivalent print GOB textbooks. One out-of-date item is the food pyramid in the last section of chapter 4. This link should be changed to the new guidelines.
The text is very practical, clear, and concise, and definitely written with the specific audience in mind. Difficult concepts and topics are broken down in a way that makes sense without losing the relevant connections for understanding chemistry.
Terminology and is consistent throughout. Each chapter begins with an introduction to the content and ends with a summary of material to review. Each section begins with clear learning objectives and ends with examples, key takeaways, and practice questions with some answers.
Within this textbook the chapter content is divided nicely into sections that are the appropriate length and easy to read. Within each section, there are links to other content in the book. This allows for sections to stand alone, making reorganization into any order easy.
The organization of content is appropriate and fitting for a one-semester GOB textbook. The flow of content works well and there are no unnecessary figures interrupting the text. Nuclear chemistry felt a little out of place but it is a chapter that doesn't quite fit in anywhere logically although it fits a little better within the introduction to the structure of atoms. It would be nice to see more connections to VSEPR and lewis structures in the organic chemistry chapter. It is a good place to review content learned earlier. In addition, there should be a periodic table presented much earlier on and not just in the appendix. It would be really easy to link to any website that has an updated table that students can interact with and learn from.
The pdf version had a lot of spacing issues and distorted figures but this did not seem to be an issue in the online version. Additionally, the format for superscripts on ion symbols was odd in some places, which is a little distracting but should not be confusing. It would be nice to be able to click on figures and zoom in to them separately from the text.
There were no grammatical errors noticed.
This book is not offensive or culturally insensitive.
This textbook is definitely designed with the audience in mind, which is much appreciated. Many of the notes and brief descriptions perfectly and clearly break down concepts in a way that is easy for beginning chemistry students to figure out and learn from. In addition, the summary sections at the end of each chapter is very useful and gives students a place to summarize chapter content but also somewhere to start reviewing for exams.
Reviewed by Stan Svojanovsky, Assistant Professor, Missouri Western State University on 5/21/18
This book is very comprehensive and covers the basics of GOB Chemistry for one or two semesters GOB course. The material is feasible for students without and prerequisite knowledge of the subject but students who are already familiar with the... read more
This book is very comprehensive and covers the basics of GOB Chemistry for one or two semesters GOB course. The material is feasible for students without and prerequisite knowledge of the subject but students who are already familiar with the basic parts of GOB Chemistry can also benefit from this textbook. The authors added multiple high quality activities (such as audio-video resources, checklists, MCQs) that make the material more interesting and reinforce the learning, comprehension and understanding via critical thinking. The text also provides many examples with step-by-step solutions in order to answer 'HOW?' and 'WHY?' question and gain a solid understanding of the subject matter. The book is divided into inorganic, organic and biochemistry parts with some aspects of analytical and physical chemistry as well.
The text is accurate. However, some of the hotlinks to additional material do not work and need to be updated.
The material is written in a long-lasting way, i.e. the main scientific information will not change very fast. Some links need to be updated but it should be relatively easy with the online textbook format. Relevance of the material with biomedical research and human health is a nice addition to the text.
The textbook is well written, the material is clear and well explained. Applications of multiple graphs and diagrams add to clarify the concepts. The great advantage of this material is the writing style using the basic vocabulary and informal style. Also 'End-of-Chapter Material' is written in a 'Study Guide' style.
The textbook is very consistent in uniform writing style, presentation of the material and interface as well. Each chapter is presented in the same order (i.e. Opening Essay, Learning Objectives, Examples, skill-building Exercises with the solution, concept review Exercises, Key Takeaway). Also, all important vocabulary is presented in bolded style.
The textbook layout is modular with each chapter divided into smaller but complete sub-chapters, clearly separated by topics and activities. All subtitles are uniform through the text and clearly labeled. The length and depth of each subsection is consistent, creating a relative easy online reading, however the navigation to each section might be more difficult for some students to move around in the text.
The textbook is organized in a typical format with initial more general topics, followed by organic and then biochemistry relevant topics. The final chapter provides the connections between previous parts as the book overview.
The layout and a PDF text format is accessible via multiple browsers and operating systems. But based on the font size some of the references posted on the bottom of the page are located differently since some parts are divided by page-beaks.
There are virtually no grammatical errors in the text. I found only a few typos that could be easily corrected.
The text is not culturally insensitive or offensive at all. However, it is focused on US students using typical US culture that might be foreign to students outside US.
This book is an excellent addition to existing Open Education Resources (OER) with a high-quality supplements for instructors, such as Instructor Manual, PPT Lecture Notes, Solution Manual, and TestBank Import for any LMS. I highly recommend it.
Reviewed by Jill Shirokawa, Visiting Assistant Professor, University of Cincinnati Clermont College on 3/27/18
This textbook includes all of the essential content needed for a one-semester General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry course. Each of the twenty chapters is divided into concept sections containing learning objectives, examples, skill-building... read more
This textbook includes all of the essential content needed for a one-semester General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry course. Each of the twenty chapters is divided into concept sections containing learning objectives, examples, skill-building exercises, concept review exercises, and answers. In addition, each chapter includes appealing features such as the Opening Essay, To Your Health, and Looking Closer that help students make connections with the chemical concepts presented. Although the subject matter is well presented, items such as a table of contents, glossary, and index are absent in this textbook.
The material in the text is accurate, however, some typos exist. Periodically, throughout the text, a reference is made to a figure, but a non-working hyperlink is provided instead.
The chemistry content within the textbook should remain appropriate for a long period of time. The information in the chapter Opening Essays help the students see the relevance of the chemical concepts. Just a few items may need updating. For example, the Opening Essay for chapter 16 contains diabetes statistics that are outdated and the MyPyramid food guidance system in chapter 4 has been replaced by the MyPlate food guidance system.
The chemical concepts are clearly written and are at an appropriate level for GOB students.
The framework of the sections within each chapter remains consistent throughout the textbook. Each section contains learning objective(s), skill building exercises, concept reviews, end of section exercises, and answers. In addition, each chapter consistently contains features such as the Opening Essay, To Your Health, and Looking Closer, which makes the chapter more appealing for students.
The modularity of the textbook is excellent. The chapters can be easily rearranged to enable a different presentation order of the material if necessary. Every chapter is divided into concept sections with every section containing learning objective(s), exercises, and answers. Having the answers attached to each section is more convenient than consistently referring to the end of the chapter or the end of the textbook.
The overall organization of the chapters and the sections within the textbook is very good. There is a logical flow from the foundational material through to the more complex material.
Due to the PDF format, the biggest interface issue is the poor maneuverability around the textbook. The need to scroll and the lack of table contents makes it difficult to navigate within the textbook. A linked access to the table of contents would be helpful. I found the inclusion of non-working hyperlinks as references to be a bit disruptive to the flow of material within a sentence. In addition, a few images are too small and many images are blurry (although readable).
I found no grammatical errors within the text.
I did not find the text to be culturally insensitive or offensive in any way. However, the text lacked photos which could serve as a means to include a variety of races, ethnicities, backgrounds, and different genders.
In general, I found the textbook to be an enjoyable read and I feel that it is written at a very appropriate level for GOB students. I liked that the learning objectives are boldly presented at the beginning of each section. Each section is well written and interesting (due to the inclusion of health and consumer information). My suggestions for improvement are: to use more diagrams and figures; to include photos to make the text more visually appealing; and to use more bold subheadings to highlight and draw attention to concepts.
Reviewed by David Merkler, Professor, University of South Florida on 3/27/18
The text is appropriate comprehensive, covering all the important concepts for the students enrolled in a GOB course. In addition, the text includes topics of biomedical relevance in an attempt to keep the students interested in the topics... read more
The text is appropriate comprehensive, covering all the important concepts for the students enrolled in a GOB course. In addition, the text includes topics of biomedical relevance in an attempt to keep the students interested in the topics covered in a GOB course.
Accuracy is fine. No glaring errors were detected - not uncommon for a GOB textbook since GOB courses cover basic topics in general chemistry, organic chemistry, and biochemistry that have been around for long time.
Relevance and longevity for a GOB textbook are hard to gauge since much of the textbook covers very basic concepts that are not likely to change or "modernize". In this text, chapters 1-10 and 12-15 are going to be largely the same in 20 years and were largely the same 20 years ago. Now, chapters 11 and chapters 16-20 could be updated (upon occasion) resulting from new discoveries in biomedical science. This reviewer would guess that the chapters covering carbohydrates (chapter 16), nucleic acids (chapter 19), and energy metabolism (chapter 20) might (emphasize might) see important changes in the next 20 years. Having said that, the basic concepts in these chapters will not change much over a 5-ish year period and any changes would be significant. Longevity for a GOB textbook is more related to issues like the long term survival of GOB courses (some universities are phasing out a GOB courses) and expectations of the students and faculty from textbooks. In particular, students seem to expect textbooks to be increasing "user friendly" as defined by the students and this expectation will change more rapidly than the materials covered in the chapters. This text could become "unpopular" for stylistic reasons far more quickly than anything related to the scientific concepts covered in the individual chapters.
Well written and quite clear. The authors have tried very hard to keep in mind the student audience for a GOB course.
Consistency is quite good. Again, the authors have kept the student audience in mind and kept terminology consistent. As anyone who has taught a GOB course knows, it is very easy to confuse this cohort of students with terminology. The authors of this text have done an excellent job, as well as possible, to eliminate this source of confusion with consistent terminology.
Outstanding for this text. The authors have done a very nice job of dividing the chapters into smaller modules to ease the students through this material. One challenge for a GOB course is the breadth of material covered and one way to handle this problem is modules. The authors have done a good job dividing the chapters into appropriate modules.
Organization is fine, except for the chapter on nuclear chemistry (chapter 11). To be honest, this is a difficult chapter to place "right" in a GOB course and making chapter 11 the nuclear chemistry chapter is fine. If I were an author, I probably would have placed the chapter right before the carbohydrate chapter, after the students have finished their "path" through organic chemistry. I would try to use the nuclear chemistry chapter to remind the students of some key concepts out of the earlier general chemistry chapters and used the nuclear chemistry chapter to try and get the students excited about the biochemical chapters - the use of 14C (and maybe 3H and 32P) in metabolic studies and the use of various isotopes for biomedical imaging. Also, biochemists use deuterium and 13c a lot in modern biomedical research. Many GOB students assume that all isotopes are radioactive and an instructor can remind the students that all isotopes are not radioactive by discussing 2H, 13C, or 18O in some biochemical context. Table 11.5 is an attempt to link isotopes to biomedical uses - why I would have placed the nuclear chemistry chapter right before the initiation of the biochemical section of the text.
I deteced no significant interface problems in going through the chapters.
I detected no grammatical errors in the text, but, to be honest, I did not read every single page with sufficient care to guarantee that the book is completely free of grammatical errors.
Cultural relevance is about as good as can be expected for a GOB text. The earlier chapters covering the basics of general and organic chemistry are the same throughout the world and, thus, are hard to place in "cultural" context.
If I taught a GOB course, I would give this text serious consideration for use - especially given the fact that my students would be able to use this text without cost (or a minimal cost, if they chose to have a printed copy).
Reviewed by Andrew Tangonan, Assistant Professor, Ohio University on 2/1/18
With the growing popularity of a one-semester GOB courses in a lot of academic institutions, this introductory book meets all the necessary requirements intended for that course. The information is presented and organized very well. However, this... read more
With the growing popularity of a one-semester GOB courses in a lot of academic institutions, this introductory book meets all the necessary requirements intended for that course. The information is presented and organized very well. However, this book has some room for improved navigation within the text.
I find the contents of this book accurate and unbiased.
This book should stay relevant for a good number of years; the core content is presented in a very straightforward manner and I don’t see it becoming obsolete any time soon. The chapters and the way it was organized and presented should be very accessible to future updates if necessary.
The book is written with significant consideration for its potential readers. As an introductory book the topics are clearly presented at a level that is easy to follow throughout the chapter. The learning outcomes are presented early on with a good end of chapter follow-ups.
The text and terminologies are consistent throughout the book. Each chapter follows the same format that should help the reader learn the content as the authors intended.
This book has 20 chapters designed as a one-semester GOB; that is a lot of topics to discuss with good depth. However, this book has a very good flow (chapters) that you can easily select and tailor topics you wish to highlight or skip. The well-organized sub-chapters with their specific learning outcomes make reorganization even easier.
The topics are presented well and the content is comparable to most GOB books currently available. They are logical and continuously build from the previous chapter. However, the readability can be improved by fixing the spacing of figures and tables (e.g. a number of figure titles are separated from the actual figure by a page).
The pdf copy I evaluated only offers “scrolling” as a means of navigating the book. I would be helpful for most readers if some links were included to a referred text, figure, appendix, or even a table of contents, which this book lacks. A table of contents with active links and link-back would also improve navigation in general.
There are no obvious grammatical errors.
I did not find anything in the book the might be considered culturally insensitive or offensive in any way.
This book warrants consideration if you are looking for a free textbook for a one semester GOB course.
Reviewed by Jeffrey Vargason, Associate Professor, George Fox University on 8/15/17
GOB (General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry) is traditionally taught as either a one-semester or a two-semester format. Based on the preface, this particular book was specifically written for a one-semester course. This book does a good job... read more
GOB (General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry) is traditionally taught as either a one-semester or a two-semester format. Based on the preface, this particular book was specifically written for a one-semester course. This book does a good job covering the subject of GOB; however, the subjects presented are covered at a sufficient depth for either a one-semester or two-semester course. There was no table of contents, index, or glossary (clickable or otherwise) in the PDF that I downloaded from the Open Textbook Library and reviewed. This created a lot of work when navigating within the textbook. There is a section at the end of each chapter devoted to summarizing the chapter including the keywords.
Overall, the content is fairly accurate. There are a few errors in figure designations in the text. For example, there is a reference to Figure 1.2 that details the steps of the scientific method in section 1.2 under “Elements and Compounds”. Either this was an intentional placeholder for the addition of a different figure that describes “Elements or Compounds” rather than the scientific method or this is an error in the placement of this reference. In addition, in the PDF that I downloaded and reviewed, there is a reference in section 1.5 to a hyperlink rather than text stating “Figure 1.7 Measuring an Object to the Correct Number of Digits”. In addition to section 1.5, this type of reference to a hyperlink rather than a title is also found in sections 1.6, 4.6, 9.1, 10.1, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 13.2, 13.5, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 18.5, 18.6, 18.7, and 18.8. Finally, in Figure 8.4 there is a filled-wedge connecting H and F in hydrogen fluoride. This may be confusing for students especially since the figure is used to describe polar covalent bonds rather than geometry. The wedges are used in the subsequent figure (8.5) to represent geometry.
The core chemistry content in GOB at this particular level should be relevant for a substantial period of time. There are a few instances where there is some obsolescence. For example, in section 4.6 in the “To Your Health” section there is a reference to the Food Pyramid or MyPyramid. This was replaced by MyPlate in 2011, so this content is about 6 years old at the time of this review. However, it would be relatively easy to update this particular section and/or figure.
Clarity rating: 2
The text was accessible and provided adequate context to help with understanding the chemical terminology.
This textbook had a consistent set of terminology and framework with just a few exceptions that I could find. In chapter 12, there is a reference preceding Figure 12.2 that requests the reader to recall that the VSEPR theory correctly predicts a tetrahedral shape for the methane molecule from section 4.5. Section 4.5 doesn’t talk about or show the structure or geometry of methane. If the reference were changed from methane to carbon tetrachloride or if methane were added into section 4.5, this would provide internal consistency. The naming of chapter 14 (organic compounds of oxygen) and chapter 15 (organic acids and bases and derivatives) is somewhat problematic in attempting to group related compounds. Carboxylic acids would seem to fit into either chapter, but are contained in the organics acids and bases categories for obvious reasons (i.e. oxygen containing compounds that are acids). Thiols aren’t compounds of oxygen though they are somewhat related as noted in the text and aren’t traditionally placed within the category of organic acids and bases at the level of a one-semester GOB textbook. Esters would seem to fit best in the title for chapter 14, but are traditionally placed in the chapter that contains carboxylic acids since they are related by chemical reactivity (i.e. esterification). It would seem that there could be a more consistent division of content either by using different chapter names for thee existing chapters or by adding an additional organic chemistry chapter.
The text is very modular which is a huge benefit of this text. There is ample division of chapters into sections that can be individually used, abbreviated, or discarded based on the course. While this text is meant for a one-semester course, it would be difficult to cover all of the included content in 15-weeks and achieve student proficiency in each of the sections. Of course, care must be taken not to remove keywords and topics that are referenced in a future chapter if sections are discarded.
The topics are ordered in nearly the same way as printed GOB textbooks. Some instructors prefer the introduction to organic chemistry found at the end of chapter 4 (section 4.6) in this textbook to be shifted to the beginning of chapter 12. The authors did address this placement in their preface and it does show some integration of organic into general chemistry even though that was not their focus. It would seem that this section would need to be reviewed when the students reach chapter 12 which is not a bad thing, but there is a lot of content in the book to cover in the traditional 15-week semester. The other sections that could fit within either a general or organic/biological chemistry chapter are sections 5.6 (redox in organic and biochemistry) and 7.5 (energy of biochemical reactions). If section 4.6 were moved to chapter 12, then 5.6 and 7.5 would likely need to be moved into an organic or biological chemistry chapter as well. In either case, sections 4.6, 5.6, and 7.5 in their present locations don’t present a logical disruption to the flow of the book. One additional note, the use of wedges is first used within a figure in section 4.5 and then again in section 8.4 and 8.5, but the topic of wedges isn’t explained or described until section 12.2.
The vast majority of the figures and tables were free of distortion and were high quality. I only noticed a few instances where the layout of figures or tables spans two pages. The most notable and perhaps distracting instance occurs when a table is not only split between two pages, but one of the rows of content within the table is split between two pages. In all of the instances that I noticed, the table headings are present on both pages of a split table, which certainly helps mitigate some of the distraction. I don’t think these pagination issues would be an issue in an ePUB, but the only format currently available from the Open Textbook Library is a PDF. The lack of other ebook formats is perhaps one of the biggest problems with this particular text. This type of splitting of content within a row across pages in the PDF is seen in Tables 3.4, 18.4, 18.5, and 18.6. This doesn’t seem to be about maintaining a large enough font size because the text in Figures 3.7 and 19.13 is very small. In Table 12.4, the “Condensed Structural Formula” heading is so cramped within its column that the heading is wrapped into eleven rows with a maximum of three letters from the heading in any one row. In addition, the condensed structural formulas are also wrapped within their respective rows potentially causing confusion for students. This same type of wrapping of text of single word can be seen in Table 18.2. In Table 20.1, both the text and structures are all low-resolution bitmapped images. This particular table would definitely benefit from an update. Many of the metabolism specific flow charts (Figure 20.4, 20.12, 20.14, and 20.16) would also benefit from a vector graphic based treatment since the text is hard to read when bitmapped.
There were a few typos found in the text and figures. For example, pyruvate is spelled incorrectly in Figure 20.4.
I did not notice any culturally insensitive or offensive text.
Reviewed by Sean Breslin, Professor of Chemistry, Umpqua Community College on 6/20/17
The text lives up to its stated purpose. It covers basic parts of general, organic, and biological chemistry but without much depth. It avoids frilly language and is written in a style with its audience in mind. The authors' choice of health... read more
The text lives up to its stated purpose. It covers basic parts of general, organic, and biological chemistry but without much depth. It avoids frilly language and is written in a style with its audience in mind. The authors' choice of health applications were well thought out and appropriate.
Other than a few minor typos, I couldn't find any glaring errors. Many scanned figures are blurry but still readable and correct.
The authors will likely need to update a few of the very rapidly developing "health applications" to keep it relevant. Overall, however, much of the fundamental theory is well developed and should stand the test of time.
The text's prose is very accessible to the beginning chemistry student. All terms are well-defined and are easily searchable with the control-F function.
Each chapter follows a consistent pattern and each chapter builds well on the previous section.
I'm primarily using this text in the third term of a three term intro to chemistry sequence. Our third term concentrates on organic and biochemical applications. It is very easy to assign readings that skip around the text. The mode of presenting material makes this quite easy.
The text is well organized and consistent.
Interface rating: 1
The only really disappointing part of the text is its interface. The lack of a "clickable" table of contents (or any table of contents as in my pdf version) made it laborious to skip from section to section and seems like it would be a pretty simple fix. It would be nice to add more outside hyperlinks, especially for links to better figures than those included.
Minor typos, but not frequent.
This, like many texts, could benefit from highlighting the contributions of the scientists themselves. I've found that including the humanity of the researchers often makes complex material more approachable to students. As opposed to being distracting and a "diversion", it often helps the students engage better with the material.
Overall, I'm thrilled to have found this OER. It's relatively difficult to find a text this basic and to the point with respect to organic and biochemistry. Most intro gen chem texts don't delve deeply enough into the biological side and organic/biochemical books are too in depth for the course I instruct. I'll definitely be adopting this text. Thank you, authors.
Reviewed by David Canoy, Instructor, Chemeketa Community College on 4/11/17
Assuming this book is for an entry level class of students preparing to take a human anatomy and physiology course, it is very thorough in the area of chemistry and acceptably thorough in cell biology. There is a complete glossary at the end of... read more
Assuming this book is for an entry level class of students preparing to take a human anatomy and physiology course, it is very thorough in the area of chemistry and acceptably thorough in cell biology. There is a complete glossary at the end of each relevant chapter and a complete index at the end of the book.
The accuracy is excellent and up to date. I found no errors or bias.
This book would be very useful for an instructor who wishes to introduce students to the basics of chemistry and cell biology in preparation for enrolling in a more advanced human physiology course. The topics are general enough that they are not likely to become out of date. The inclusion of historical information and descriptions of professional fields related to the topics adds to the relevance.
The logical sequence of information in this book keeps it clear for the reader. The availability of the glossary at the end of each chapter also keeps the terminology accessible and understandable.
The consistency for the most part is very good. There is a break in how chapter questions are organized between the sections on chemistry in contrast to those about biology.
Two large chapters with many subheadings are chapter 3 (general and organic chemistry combined) and chapter 7 (combining nutrition, digestion, energy, reaction rates, photosynthesis and enzymes). Within the subtopics some instructors will probably want to eliminate some details (i.e. calculating pOH, discussion of s,p,d,f orbitals or free energy).
This is a very well organized book and the topics are well connected.
This book is free of any poorly constructed images. The color and detail is excellent. The copy I examined did have a structural problem at the end of chapter 7 where the summary and review questions were repeated.
No errors found
Contributions by more women and minorities could add to the historical notes in this text.
It is always tempting to want to add more to texts we use in our classes. In this case I would have liked to see more details about cellular structure (ER and Golgi Apparatus). I would also add a section to Unit 3 on patterns of human genetics/inheritance.
Reviewed by Kenneth Friedrich, Instructor of Chemistry, Portland Community College on 12/5/16
As the title suggests this book covers the basics of GOB chemistry. It includes all the appropriate material for a one semester GOB course. The book brings in organic chemistry topics earlier than many books allowing students to see the links... read more
As the title suggests this book covers the basics of GOB chemistry. It includes all the appropriate material for a one semester GOB course. The book brings in organic chemistry topics earlier than many books allowing students to see the links between the various branches of chemistry. Roughly half the book is devoted to general chemistry and there is a large focus on metabolism at the end. A table of contents and easy method to move around in the PDF would be preferable.
In general the information in the book is accurate. There are a few typos and minor font issues as with any text.
The scientific information in the book is not dramatically changing. The contents should hold up for many years. The book does a good job of helping students understand the relevance of chemistry in their lives. Each chapter has sections that tell students about various careers in science and how the information relates to human health.
The book is well written and gets right to the important information without being wordy. It is written with beginning students in mind. It could benefit from more particle level diagrams in the general chemistry chapters to help students with the visualization of various concepts. However, I wish some of the diagrams and flow charts made for this text were in more texts.
The book is very consistent in its presentation of topics. It uses the same language throughout to help students link various topics in chemistry. Each chapter points out important terminology with bolded words. Learning objectives, examples, skill-building exercises, concept review exercises, key takeaways and exercises are all clearly labeled and presented in the same order in each chapter.
Each chapter is broken down into small bite-sized chunks of material with many practice exercises. I think students would benefit from this approach. Learning objectives, examples, skill-building exercises, concept review exercises, key takeaways and exercises are all clearly labeled and presented in the same order in each chapter. The lack of an easy way to navigate to each of the chapter sections makes it difficult to move around in the book.
The book is organized in a typical fashion for GOB chemistry books. General chemistry topics are first followed by organic chemistry topics and finally biochemistry topics. The topics in each section are covered in a logical progression.
The lack of a table of contents and an easy way to navigate to each of the chapter sections makes it difficult to move around in the book. Some sections are divided by page breaks. All chapters and sections within them are clearly labeled and color coded.
In general there are no grammatical errors. There are a few typos as with any text.
The text is not culturally insensitive or offensive.
Currently our college has a year long course for our GOB series 3 quarters). If we had a two quarter GOB I would very seriously consider adopting this book.
Reviewed by Beth Manhat, Adjunct Professor, Portland Community College on 8/21/16
This open course textbook introduces the fundamental of general chemistry (measurements, atomic structure, compounds, energy, reactions, etc), introduces structure and reactions of organic chemistry, and ends with rather substantial chapters on... read more
This open course textbook introduces the fundamental of general chemistry (measurements, atomic structure, compounds, energy, reactions, etc), introduces structure and reactions of organic chemistry, and ends with rather substantial chapters on biochemistry. My interest is with the general chemistry for a prep class. This book contains all the necessary pieces, good figures, and exercises for the purpose of a fundamental chemistry class. I wish the book had a table of contents with pages to navigate the pdf more effectively
The general chemistry information appears accurate and fundamental.
Introductory chemistry has been fundamentally unchanged. This book present conventional material in a way that can ensure it application. The types of problems are expected for the level of the writing for this book.
The figures in the early chapters (1-5) make the material more straight forward for understanding. The book had bolded words for clarity, and use adequate tone and description for this level.
The text uses the appropriate terms and tone to describe fundamental structure, bonding, and steps for quantitative relationships. I also found the step description easy to follow.
Again the use of a table of contents with page numbers would be helpful here. It is difficult to know how far to "scroll" while working blind on chapter lengths and pages. However, the authors break up the existing text well with figures, captions, and problems to solve. There are heading fr sections, color coding for problems, and obvious organization to the reader.
The flow and organization of the book is logical. The authors begin with basic general chemistry, increasing complexity through compounds, reactions, energy, and acid base solutions, before reaching organic, and biochemistry.
I found a few images to be blurry, but well used. The colored boxes for problems were helpful, but often much larger than the text of the questions. I found this to be somewhat distracting.
I did not find grammatical, spelling, or significant formatting errors.
I did not detect cultural exclusion or offense.
I appreciate the fundamental and straight-to-the-point angle of this book for any GOB class. I would greatly prefer a table of contents for easier navigation.
Reviewed by Brian Kalet, Academic Success Coordinator, Colorado State University on 1/7/16
This text is intended for a one semester general, organic, biochemistry course and as such would not be appropriate for a standalone general chemistry course, organic chemistry course or biochemistry course. There is no index or glossary. read more
This text is intended for a one semester general, organic, biochemistry course and as such would not be appropriate for a standalone general chemistry course, organic chemistry course or biochemistry course. There is no index or glossary.
The text is generally accurate. However, some typos do exist.
The content is generally up to date and updates should be easy to incorporate.
The text is very accessible and technical terms are defined appropriately.
Ionic species representation needs to be consistent.
The text is easily and readily divisible into smaller reading sections, however, having an interactive table of contents would be helpful.
The material flows in a logical sequence. However, it is difficult to jump directly to a specific chapter or figure.
Being able to jump to a specific chapter or figure would be beneficial to students.
Some typos exist.
The biological examples are useful. Figures should be numbered so they can be referenced in class.
Reviewed by Paul Laybourn, Professor, Colorado State University on 1/7/16
Overall, this textbook covers all the appropriate topics to the depth necessary for a one semester course on general, organic and biological chemistry. This textbook includes units of measurement, calculations and the mathematics background... read more
Overall, this textbook covers all the appropriate topics to the depth necessary for a one semester course on general, organic and biological chemistry. This textbook includes units of measurement, calculations and the mathematics background necessary top promote quantitative thinking without burying the student in problem sets. The only omission is Gibbs free energy. No index, bookmarks or glossary are provided.
No factual or conceptual errors in this test were noted and the topics and concepts were all presented in an unbiased manner. There are a few spaces missing between some the words.
Basic general, organic and biological chemistry are not topics that are rapidly being modified or updates with new findings each year so this textbook will remain relevant for many years. Each chapter and section begins with learning objectives and ends with example problems and exercises and the key takeaway point. Each chapter begins with descriptions of how the chapter topic relates to health and societal issues, most of which are not likely to become irrelevant in the future. The topics are well subdivided so updating any revised sections should be easily done.
The text descriptions of chemical concepts clearly written and set at the appropriate level for the intended audience. All key scientific terms are defined in place and all the writing is direct and clear with a minimum of extraneous verbiage.
This text is written and organized logically and consistently.
As mentioned previously, the textbook topics are divided between the chapters and subdivided with each chapter. It will quite easy for instructors to pick an choose topics and subtopics the wish to assign for their course. Changing the order of topic assignment should present no problems.
The textbook topics and chapters begin with a definition of science, chemistry in the context of all scientific disciplines and core chemical concepts and skills. The text then progresses through the essential general chemistry, organic chemistry and biochemical topics with a logical distribution between chapters and in an order that build progressively on previous topics.
The textbook provides no other means than scrolling through the pdf to navigate through the chapters. Clear, consistent color coding and heading are provided throughout.
The text is free of grammatical error. There are a few spaces that are missing, perhaps being lost in the generation of the pdf.
Cultural Relevance rating: 2
No culturally insensitive content was included. However, the textbook could be improved through more inclusive examples, applications and cultural relevance. For example, health disparities between U.S. ethnic groups and between countries.
This textbook is intended for a one semester survey course, perhaps for pre-nursing students, etc. In addition, I believe portions of this textbook could be assigned for background and review of core general and organic chemistry topics for students in more advanced biochemistry courses.
About the book.
The Basics of General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry by David W. Ball, John W. Hill, and Rhonda J. Scott is for the one-semester General, Organic and Biological Chemistry course. The authors designed this textbook from the ground up to meet the needs of a one-semester course. It is 20 chapters in length and approximately 350-400 pages; just the right breadth and depth for instructors to teach and students to grasp.
In addition, The Basics of General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry is written not by one chemist, but THREE chemistry professors with specific, complimentary research and teaching areas. David W. Ball's specialty is physical chemistry, John W. Hill's is organic chemistry, and finally, Rhonda J. Scott's background is in enzyme and peptide chemistry. These three authors have the expertise to identify and present only the most important material for students to learn in the GOB Chemistry course.
These experienced authors have ensured their text has ample in-text examples, and ”Test Yourself“ questions following the examples so students can immediately check their comprehension. The end-of-chapter exercises will be paired, with one answered in the back of the text so homework can easily be assigned and self-checked.
The Basics of General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry by David W. Ball, John W. Hill, and Rhonda J. Scott is the right text for you and your students if you are looking for a GOB textbook with just the right amount of coverage without overdoing the concepts and overwhelming your students.
Dr. David W. Ball is a professor of chemistry at Cleveland State University in Ohio. He earned his PhD from Rice University in Houston, Texas. His specialty is physical chemistry, which he teaches at the undergraduate and graduate levels. About 50% of his teaching is in general chemistry: chemistry for nonscience majors, GOB, and general chemistry for science and engineering majors. In addition to this text, he is the author of a math review book for general chemistry students, a physical chemistry textbook with accompanying student and instructor solutions manuals, and two books on spectroscopy (published by SPIE Press). He is coauthor of a general chemistry textbook (with Dan Reger and Scott Goode), whose third edition was published in January 2009. His publication list has over 180 items, roughly evenly distributed between research papers and articles of educational interest.
Dr. John W. Hill is professor emeritus from the University of Wisconsin–River Falls. He earned his PhD from the University of Arkansas. As an organic chemist, he has more than 50 publications in refereed journals, most of which have an educational bent. He has authored or coauthored several introductory level chemistry textbooks, all of which have gone into multiple editions. He has also presented over 60 papers at national conferences, many relating to science education. He has received several awards for outstanding teaching and has long been active in the American Chemical Society—both locally and nationally.
Dr. Rhonda J. Scott is a professor of chemistry at Southern Adventist University in Collegedale, Tennessee. She earned her PhD from the University of California at Riverside and has a background in enzyme and peptide chemistry. Previous to Southern Adventist, she taught at Loma Linda University and the University of Wisconsin–River Falls. In the past 10 years, she has made several presentations at national American Chemical Society meetings and other workshops and conferences. She has also been very active in the development of teaching materials, having reviewed or contributed to other textbooks and test banks.
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Chemical biology is the study of the chemicals and chemical reactions involved in biological processes, incorporating the disciplines of bioorganic chemistry, biochemistry, cell biology and pharmacology. Chemicals – including natural small molecules, such as lipids, carbohydrates and metals, or non-natural probe or drug molecules – are used to gain insight into biological problems at a mechanistic level.
The integration of a new orthogonal redox cofactor opens opportunities for controlling reaction equilibria. Because it does not interfere with cellular redox homeostasis, this approach enables the precise tuning of metabolic pathways and the optimization of microbial bioproduction, independently of canonical redox balancing.
Redesigning mRNA with chemo-topological strategies improves its stability and translation efficiency, paving the way for more effective mRNA therapeutics.
Research in the early days of chemical biology was mostly limited to the application of chemical tools to model cell lines grown in incubators. Now, discoveries are being made in more physiologically relevant systems, from tissues to organisms, using precisely targeted molecules. The 2023 Chemical Biology & Physiology meeting (in Portland, Oregon) discussed the latest advances in the field, with research from around the globe demonstrating that the transition to making discoveries at the chemical biology–physiology interface is happening now.
Active deep learning is a promising approach to learn from low-data scenarios in drug discovery. This study illuminates key success factors of active learning and shows that it can boost hit discovery by up to sixfold over traditional methods.
Most naturally occurring O-GalNAc glycans can be synthesized from eight glycan core structures. This protocol describes their synthesis from a common precursor via reactions with four glycosyl donors.
Transferrin receptor targeting chimeras have been developed that enable targeting of drug resistance in epidermal growth factor receptor-driven lung cancer and reversible control of human primary chimeric antigen receptor T cells, representing a promising new family of bifunctional antibodies for targeted cancer therapy.
In this Review, Münzel and colleagues describe the adverse effects of soil and water pollution, including heavy metal, pesticide, and microplastic and nanoplastic pollution, on cardiovascular health and provide an overview of the eco-disruptive causes of this pollution.
The use of an adenine base editor enables identification of functional serine, threonine and tyrosine residues that impact cell fitness on a genome-wide scale with possible involvement in phosphorylation, structural maintenance and cancer biology.
mRNA cap designs boost translation >10-fold, with potential benefits for RNA therapies.
An mRNA sequence that encodes a zwitterionic polypeptide fused to a therapeutic protein improves the pharmacokinetic properties of mRNA therapeutics.
Orally bioavailable, high molecular weight macrocyclic peptides that inhibit difficult-to-drug protein–protein interactions are of high therapeutic value, and rules for their design were proposed recently. Here, we emphasize the danger of rules that provide a false impression of the lipophilicity required of a clinical candidate.
International Baccalaureate (IB)
IB students around the globe fear writing the Extended Essay, but it doesn't have to be a source of stress! In this article, I'll get you excited about writing your Extended Essay and provide you with the resources you need to get an A on it.
If you're reading this article, I'm going to assume you're an IB student getting ready to write your Extended Essay. If you're looking at this as a potential future IB student, I recommend reading our introductory IB articles first, including our guide to what the IB program is and our full coverage of the IB curriculum .
I myself am a recipient of an IB Diploma, and I happened to receive an A on my IB Extended Essay. Don't believe me? The proof is in the IBO pudding:
If you're confused by what this report means, EE is short for Extended Essay , and English A1 is the subject that my Extended Essay topic coordinated with. In layman's terms, my IB Diploma was graded in May 2010, I wrote my Extended Essay in the English A1 category, and I received an A grade on it.
The IB Extended Essay, or EE , is a mini-thesis you write under the supervision of an IB advisor (an IB teacher at your school), which counts toward your IB Diploma (learn more about the major IB Diploma requirements in our guide) . I will explain exactly how the EE affects your Diploma later in this article.
For the Extended Essay, you will choose a research question as a topic, conduct the research independently, then write an essay on your findings . The essay itself is a long one—although there's a cap of 4,000 words, most successful essays get very close to this limit.
Keep in mind that the IB requires this essay to be a "formal piece of academic writing," meaning you'll have to do outside research and cite additional sources.
The IB Extended Essay must include the following:
Additionally, your research topic must fall into one of the six approved DP categories , or IB subject groups, which are as follows:
Once you figure out your category and have identified a potential research topic, it's time to pick your advisor, who is normally an IB teacher at your school (though you can also find one online ). This person will help direct your research, and they'll conduct the reflection sessions you'll have to do as part of your Extended Essay.
As of 2018, the IB requires a "reflection process" as part of your EE supervision process. To fulfill this requirement, you have to meet at least three times with your supervisor in what the IB calls "reflection sessions." These meetings are not only mandatory but are also part of the formal assessment of the EE and your research methods.
According to the IB, the purpose of these meetings is to "provide an opportunity for students to reflect on their engagement with the research process." Basically, these meetings give your supervisor the opportunity to offer feedback, push you to think differently, and encourage you to evaluate your research process.
The final reflection session is called the viva voce, and it's a short 10- to 15-minute interview between you and your advisor. This happens at the very end of the EE process, and it's designed to help your advisor write their report, which factors into your EE grade.
Here are the topics covered in your viva voce :
Your completed Extended Essay, along with your supervisor's report, will then be sent to the IB to be graded. We'll cover the assessment criteria in just a moment.
We'll help you learn how to have those "lightbulb" moments...even on test day!
You can technically write about anything, so long as it falls within one of the approved categories listed above.
It's best to choose a topic that matches one of the IB courses , (such as Theatre, Film, Spanish, French, Math, Biology, etc.), which shouldn't be difficult because there are so many class subjects.
Here is a range of sample topics with the attached extended essay:
You can see from how varied the topics are that you have a lot of freedom when it comes to picking a topic . So how do you pick when the options are limitless?
Below are six key tips to keep in mind as you work on your Extended Essay for the IB DP. Follow these and you're sure to get an A!
You can't expect to write a compelling essay if you're not a fan of the topic on which you're writing. For example, I just love British theatre and ended up writing my Extended Essay on a revolution in post-WWII British theatre. (Yes, I'm definitely a #TheatreNerd.)
I really encourage anyone who pursues an IB Diploma to take the Extended Essay seriously. I was fortunate enough to receive a full-tuition merit scholarship to USC's School of Dramatic Arts program. In my interview for the scholarship, I spoke passionately about my Extended Essay; thus, I genuinely think my Extended Essay helped me get my scholarship.
But how do you find a topic you're passionate about? Start by thinking about which classes you enjoy the most and why . Do you like math classes because you like to solve problems? Or do you enjoy English because you like to analyze literary texts?
Keep in mind that there's no right or wrong answer when it comes to choosing your Extended Essay topic. You're not more likely to get high marks because you're writing about science, just like you're not doomed to failure because you've chosen to tackle the social sciences. The quality of what you produce—not the field you choose to research within—will determine your grade.
Once you've figured out your category, you should brainstorm more specific topics by putting pen to paper . What was your favorite chapter you learned in that class? Was it astrophysics or mechanics? What did you like about that specific chapter? Is there something you want to learn more about? I recommend spending a few hours on this type of brainstorming.
One last note: if you're truly stumped on what to research, pick a topic that will help you in your future major or career . That way you can use your Extended Essay as a talking point in your college essays (and it will prepare you for your studies to come too!).
There's a fine line between broad and narrow. You need to write about something specific, but not so specific that you can't write 4,000 words on it.
You can't write about WWII because that would be a book's worth of material. You also don't want to write about what type of soup prisoners of war received behind enemy lines, because you probably won’t be able to come up with 4,000 words of material about it. However, you could possibly write about how the conditions in German POW camps—and the rations provided—were directly affected by the Nazis' successes and failures on the front, including the use of captured factories and prison labor in Eastern Europe to increase production. WWII military history might be a little overdone, but you get my point.
If you're really stuck trying to pinpoint a not-too-broad-or-too-narrow topic, I suggest trying to brainstorm a topic that uses a comparison. Once you begin looking through the list of sample essays below, you'll notice that many use comparisons to formulate their main arguments.
I also used a comparison in my EE, contrasting Harold Pinter's Party Time with John Osborne's Look Back in Anger in order to show a transition in British theatre. Topics with comparisons of two to three plays, books, and so on tend to be the sweet spot. You can analyze each item and then compare them with one another after doing some in-depth analysis of each individually. The ways these items compare and contrast will end up forming the thesis of your essay!
When choosing a comparative topic, the key is that the comparison should be significant. I compared two plays to illustrate the transition in British theatre, but you could compare the ways different regional dialects affect people's job prospects or how different temperatures may or may not affect the mating patterns of lightning bugs. The point here is that comparisons not only help you limit your topic, but they also help you build your argument.
Comparisons are not the only way to get a grade-A EE, though. If after brainstorming, you pick a non-comparison-based topic and are still unsure whether your topic is too broad or narrow, spend about 30 minutes doing some basic research and see how much material is out there.
If there are more than 1,000 books, articles, or documentaries out there on that exact topic, it may be too broad. But if there are only two books that have any connection to your topic, it may be too narrow. If you're still unsure, ask your advisor—it's what they're there for! Speaking of advisors...
Don't get stuck with a narrow topic!
If you're not certain of who you would like to be your advisor, create a list of your top three choices. Next, write down the pros and cons of each possibility (I know this sounds tedious, but it really helps!).
For example, Mr. Green is my favorite teacher and we get along really well, but he teaches English. For my EE, I want to conduct an experiment that compares the efficiency of American electric cars with foreign electric cars.
I had Ms. White a year ago. She teaches physics and enjoyed having me in her class. Unlike Mr. Green, Ms. White could help me design my experiment.
Based on my topic and what I need from my advisor, Ms. White would be a better fit for me than would Mr. Green (even though I like him a lot).
The moral of my story is this: do not just ask your favorite teacher to be your advisor . They might be a hindrance to you if they teach another subject. For example, I would not recommend asking your biology teacher to guide you in writing an English literature-based EE.
There can, of course, be exceptions to this rule. If you have a teacher who's passionate and knowledgeable about your topic (as my English teacher was about my theatre topic), you could ask that instructor. Consider all your options before you do this. There was no theatre teacher at my high school, so I couldn't find a theatre-specific advisor, but I chose the next best thing.
Before you approach a teacher to serve as your advisor, check with your high school to see what requirements they have for this process. Some IB high schools require your IB Extended Essay advisor to sign an Agreement Form , for instance.
Make sure that you ask your IB coordinator whether there is any required paperwork to fill out. If your school needs a specific form signed, bring it with you when you ask your teacher to be your EE advisor.
Some teachers might just take on students because they have to and aren't very passionate about reading drafts, only giving you minimal feedback. Choose a teacher who will take the time to read several drafts of your essay and give you extensive notes. I would not have gotten my A without being pushed to make my Extended Essay draft better.
Ask a teacher that you have experience with through class or an extracurricular activity. Do not ask a teacher that you have absolutely no connection to. If a teacher already knows you, that means they already know your strengths and weaknesses, so they know what to look for, where you need to improve, and how to encourage your best work.
Also, don't forget that your supervisor's assessment is part of your overall EE score . If you're meeting with someone who pushes you to do better—and you actually take their advice—they'll have more impressive things to say about you than a supervisor who doesn't know you well and isn't heavily involved in your research process.
Be aware that the IB only allows advisors to make suggestions and give constructive criticism. Your teacher cannot actually help you write your EE. The IB recommends that the supervisor spends approximately two to three hours in total with the candidate discussing the EE.
The IB likes structure. Your EE needs a clear introduction (which should be one to two double-spaced pages), research question/focus (i.e., what you're investigating), a body, and a conclusion (about one double-spaced page). An essay with unclear organization will be graded poorly.
The body of your EE should make up the bulk of the essay. It should be about eight to 18 pages long (again, depending on your topic). Your body can be split into multiple parts. For example, if you were doing a comparison, you might have one third of your body as Novel A Analysis, another third as Novel B Analysis, and the final third as your comparison of Novels A and B.
If you're conducting an experiment or analyzing data, such as in this EE , your EE body should have a clear structure that aligns with the scientific method ; you should state the research question, discuss your method, present the data, analyze the data, explain any uncertainties, and draw a conclusion and/or evaluate the success of the experiment.
You will not be able to crank out a 4,000-word essay in just a week and get an A on it. You'll be reading many, many articles (and, depending on your topic, possibly books and plays as well!). As such, it's imperative that you start your research as soon as possible.
Each school has a slightly different deadline for the Extended Essay. Some schools want them as soon as November of your senior year; others will take them as late as February. Your school will tell you what your deadline is. If they haven't mentioned it by February of your junior year, ask your IB coordinator about it.
Some high schools will provide you with a timeline of when you need to come up with a topic, when you need to meet with your advisor, and when certain drafts are due. Not all schools do this. Ask your IB coordinator if you are unsure whether you are on a specific timeline.
Below is my recommended EE timeline. While it's earlier than most schools, it'll save you a ton of heartache (trust me, I remember how hard this process was!):
Remember that in the middle of these milestones, you'll need to schedule two other reflection sessions with your advisor . (Your teachers will actually take notes on these sessions on a form like this one , which then gets submitted to the IB.)
I recommend doing them when you get feedback on your drafts, but these meetings will ultimately be up to your supervisor. Just don't forget to do them!
The early bird DOES get the worm!
Extended Essays are graded by examiners appointed by the IB on a scale of 0 to 34 . You'll be graded on five criteria, each with its own set of points. You can learn more about how EE scoring works by reading the IB guide to extended essays .
How well you do on each of these criteria will determine the final letter grade you get for your EE. You must earn at least a D to be eligible to receive your IB Diploma.
Although each criterion has a point value, the IB explicitly states that graders are not converting point totals into grades; instead, they're using qualitative grade descriptors to determine the final grade of your Extended Essay . Grade descriptors are on pages 102-103 of this document .
Here's a rough estimate of how these different point values translate to letter grades based on previous scoring methods for the EE. This is just an estimate —you should read and understand the grade descriptors so you know exactly what the scorers are looking for.
30-34 | Excellent: A |
25-29 | Good: B |
17-24 | Satisfactory: C |
9-16 | Mediocre: D |
0-8 | Elementary: E |
Here is the breakdown of EE scores (from the May 2021 bulletin):
A | 10.1% |
B | 24.4% |
C | 40.8% |
D | 22.5% |
E | 1.4% |
N (No Grade Awarded) | 0.7% |
The Extended Essay grade is combined with your TOK (Theory of Knowledge) grade to determine how many points you get toward your IB Diploma.
To learn about Theory of Knowledge or how many points you need to receive an IB Diploma, read our complete guide to the IB program and our guide to the IB Diploma requirements .
This diagram shows how the two scores are combined to determine how many points you receive for your IB diploma (3 being the most, 0 being the least). In order to get your IB Diploma, you have to earn 24 points across both categories (the TOK and EE). The highest score anyone can earn is 45 points.
Let's say you get an A on your EE and a B on TOK. You will get 3 points toward your Diploma. As of 2014, a student who scores an E on either the extended essay or TOK essay will not be eligible to receive an IB Diploma .
Prior to the class of 2010, a Diploma candidate could receive a failing grade in either the Extended Essay or Theory of Knowledge and still be awarded a Diploma, but this is no longer true.
Figuring out how you're assessed can be a little tricky. Luckily, the IB breaks everything down here in this document . (The assessment information begins on page 219.)
In case you want a little more guidance on how to get an A on your EE, here are over 40 excellent (grade A) sample extended essays for your reading pleasure. Essays are grouped by IB subject.
Trying to figure out what extracurriculars you should do? Learn more about participating in the Science Olympiad , starting a club , doing volunteer work , and joining Student Government .
Studying for the SAT? Check out our expert study guide to the SAT . Taking the SAT in a month or so? Learn how to cram effectively for this important test .
Not sure where you want to go to college? Read our guide to finding your target school . Also, determine your target SAT score or target ACT score .
How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League
How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA
How to Write an Amazing College Essay
What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?
ACT vs. SAT: Which Test Should You Take?
When should you take the SAT or ACT?
Get Your Free
Find Your Target SAT Score
Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests
Score 800 on SAT Math
Score 800 on SAT Reading and Writing
Score 600 on SAT Math
Score 600 on SAT Reading and Writing
Find Your Target ACT Score
Complete Official Free ACT Practice Tests
Get a 36 on ACT English
Get a 36 on ACT Math
Get a 36 on ACT Reading
Get a 36 on ACT Science
Get a 24 on ACT English
Get a 24 on ACT Math
Get a 24 on ACT Reading
Get a 24 on ACT Science
Stay Informed
Get the latest articles and test prep tips!
As an SAT/ACT tutor, Dora has guided many students to test prep success. She loves watching students succeed and is committed to helping you get there. Dora received a full-tuition merit based scholarship to University of Southern California. She graduated magna cum laude and scored in the 99th percentile on the ACT. She is also passionate about acting, writing, and photography.
Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!
|
Chemistry:
Design Technology
Individuals & Society:
I have an exemplar but the file is too big to upload. If you are interested in this topic I can share the essay with you.
Information Technology in a Global Society
Social & Cultural Anthropology
World Religions
Language Acquisition:
Literature & Language
Math:
Visual Arts:
Interdisciplinary Essays:
Environmental Systems & Societies
World Studies
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
Biology is a branch of science that deals with living organisms and their vital processes. Biology encompasses diverse fields, including botany , conservation , ecology , evolution , genetics , marine biology , medicine , microbiology , molecular biology , physiology , and zoology .
As a field of science , biology helps us understand the living world and the ways its many species (including humans ) function, evolve, and interact. Advances in medicine , agriculture , biotechnology , and many other areas of biology have brought improvements in the quality of life. Fields such as genetics and evolution give insight into the past and can help shape the future, and research in ecology and conservation inform how we can protect this planet’s precious biodiversity .
Biology graduates can hold a wide range of jobs, some of which may require additional education. A person with a degree in biology could work in agriculture , health care, biotechnology , education, environmental conservation, research, forensic science , policy, science communication, and many other areas.
biology , study of living things and their vital processes. The field deals with all the physicochemical aspects of life . The modern tendency toward cross-disciplinary research and the unification of scientific knowledge and investigation from different fields has resulted in significant overlap of the field of biology with other scientific disciplines . Modern principles of other fields— chemistry , medicine , and physics , for example—are integrated with those of biology in areas such as biochemistry , biomedicine, and biophysics .
Biology is subdivided into separate branches for convenience of study, though all the subdivisions are interrelated by basic principles. Thus, while it is custom to separate the study of plants ( botany ) from that of animals ( zoology ), and the study of the structure of organisms ( morphology ) from that of function ( physiology ), all living things share in common certain biological phenomena—for example, various means of reproduction , cell division , and the transmission of genetic material.
Biology is often approached on the basis of levels that deal with fundamental units of life. At the level of molecular biology , for example, life is regarded as a manifestation of chemical and energy transformations that occur among the many chemical constituents that compose an organism. As a result of the development of increasingly powerful and precise laboratory instruments and techniques, it is possible to understand and define with high precision and accuracy not only the ultimate physiochemical organization (ultrastructure) of the molecules in living matter but also the way living matter reproduces at the molecular level. Especially crucial to those advances was the rise of genomics in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
Cell biology is the study of cells—the fundamental units of structure and function in living organisms. Cells were first observed in the 17th century, when the compound microscope was invented. Before that time, the individual organism was studied as a whole in a field known as organismic biology; that area of research remains an important component of the biological sciences. Population biology deals with groups or populations of organisms that inhabit a given area or region. Included at that level are studies of the roles that specific kinds of plants and animals play in the complex and self-perpetuating interrelationships that exist between the living and the nonliving world, as well as studies of the built-in controls that maintain those relationships naturally. Those broadly based levels— molecules , cells, whole organisms, and populations—may be further subdivided for study, giving rise to specializations such as morphology , taxonomy , biophysics, biochemistry, genetics , epigenetics , and ecology . A field of biology may be especially concerned with the investigation of one kind of living thing—for example, the study of birds in ornithology , the study of fishes in ichthyology , or the study of microorganisms in microbiology .
Biological principles.
The concept of homeostasis —that living things maintain a constant internal environment—was first suggested in the 19th century by French physiologist Claude Bernard , who stated that “all the vital mechanisms, varied as they are, have only one object: that of preserving constant the conditions of life.”
As originally conceived by Bernard, homeostasis applied to the struggle of a single organism to survive. The concept was later extended to include any biological system from the cell to the entire biosphere , all the areas of Earth inhabited by living things.
All living organisms, regardless of their uniqueness, have certain biological, chemical, and physical characteristics in common. All, for example, are composed of basic units known as cells and of the same chemical substances, which, when analyzed, exhibit noteworthy similarities, even in such disparate organisms as bacteria and humans . Furthermore, since the action of any organism is determined by the manner in which its cells interact and since all cells interact in much the same way, the basic functioning of all organisms is also similar.
There is not only unity of basic living substance and functioning but also unity of origin of all living things. According to a theory proposed in 1855 by German pathologist Rudolf Virchow , “all living cells arise from pre-existing living cells.” That theory appears to be true for all living things at the present time under existing environmental conditions. If, however, life originated on Earth more than once in the past, the fact that all organisms have a sameness of basic structure, composition , and function would seem to indicate that only one original type succeeded.
A common origin of life would explain why in humans or bacteria—and in all forms of life in between—the same chemical substance, deoxyribonucleic acid ( DNA ), in the form of genes accounts for the ability of all living matter to replicate itself exactly and to transmit genetic information from parent to offspring. Furthermore, the mechanisms for that transmittal follow a pattern that is the same in all organisms.
Whenever a change in a gene (a mutation ) occurs, there is a change of some kind in the organism that contains the gene. It is this universal phenomenon that gives rise to the differences ( variations ) in populations of organisms from which nature selects for survival those that are best able to cope with changing conditions in the environment .
Have you been admitted and need to lock in your decision?
Click the link below to pay your deposit now!
Deposit Today
Jan 26, 2021
Trying to weigh the big decision: biology vs. chemistry? Read on to learn about what makes each discipline unique so you can make the most well-informed decision about becoming a biology, chemistry, or biochemistry major .
Biology is the study of life, meaning anything that eats and breathes falls under the subject. What you do with living things covers a range of skills including classifying them, charting their evolution, cataloging their various forms, and of course studying how they’re put together.
As you most likely know, biology is a natural science—along with physics, chemistry, astronomy, and Earth science—from which other, more specialized areas of science begin. As such, the study of biology lends itself to a wide range of skills and concepts that can be applied to a host of different careers.
Biology teaches data analysis first and foremost. In your courses, you’ll learn how to gather information quantitatively and then determine what the numbers tell you. “Just because” is never enough for biologists, as every hunch must be backed up by numerical data. Once you get a handle on what data tells you, you’ll learn to predict trends and behavior based on factors at hand. Biology involves acting to prevent problems in living things as much as reacting to and studying what they do.
Biology is not all numbers, however. Scientific data is often difficult or intimidating for audiences, so biologists have to be experts in clear, concise presentation of ideas through both their speaking and writing.
A biology student should be in love with the scientific method—knowing how to design and execute experiments. Identifying constants and variables and running plenty of tests to make sure you are ready for any eventuality are skills that cross many disciplines, but biology absolutely depends on these skills.
You also need to be comfortable, and preferably excited, about learning the latest technology and trying new tools. Any scientist needs to be at one with their instruments, so gadget love is a big plus.
More like what can't you do. Biology is a gateway to a lot of career paths, and a grounding in the subject will always be highly sought after by employers.
You’ll soon find you can stop asking, “ What can you do with a biology degree ?” and discover that biology has numerous specific concentrations, and choosing one will do a lot to help you focus your career options. You can become a marine biologist, studying aquatic life; a microbiologist, specializing in living things you can’t see with the naked eye; you can work in genetics, looking at heredity and how beings evolve; bioinformatics, using computer technology to predict and detail natural occurrences; or biochemistry, which we will discuss more later.
You probably think first of biology leading to a job doing research, and that’s true—a lot of biologists make time in the lab during their career. They work primarily for academic institutions on specific projects, publishing studies and reviewing articles from others. Lab jobs can also be part of private companies or government offices, working on product testing or prevention of infectious diseases.
Biology degrees can also lead to work in environmental management, helping consulting firms and nonprofit organizations work on conservation efforts and generate information to help lobby the government.
One of the more popular paths for a biology major is going into healthcare, whether as a medical doctor, medical researcher, nurse practitioner, public health specialist, dentist or veterinarian. On the other hand, biology may lead you on a path to a different degree, such as one in public health. If this interests you, see more to answer the question “ What is a public health degree ?” on our blog!
Another popular area stemming from biology is engineering, specifically applying engineering principles to living systems. Biological engineers can work in healthcare designing medical devices, in environmental science agencies creating cleaner and more efficient ways to process fuel, or with major manufacturers and farms helping to create sustainable ways to produce food and protein.
Other jobs biology majors tend to get that may be a bit surprising are personal trainers, dieticians and nutritionists, and writers and illustrators for scientific textbooks, guides and journals.
And you can always do more within the educational world, by going for an advanced degree in biology, or doing advanced research and teaching as a biology faculty member at a college or university.
Is it a good idea to get into biology careers?
We mentioned above that there is always demand for expertise in biology, but it is important to know just how much. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) predicts that over the next six years or so, common jobs of biology majors are going to be in higher demand, not lower. Healthcare, business and engineering jobs coming from biology backgrounds will grow the most, unfortunately because of the mounting challenges to our bodies and the environment.
Going into dentistry is one lucrative example—the BLS predicts 19% growth for dental professionals through 2026 with an average annual salary of over $156,000. Some more specific examples of jobs that will see growth through 2026 include zoologists (8% growth), biochemists (11%), medical scientists (13%) and genetic counselors (29%).
As with most industries, the jobs bio majors tend to get correspond to your highest degree and experience level. While you might have to work your way up with an associate’s or bachelor’s degree, you can walk into a high-paying position as a researcher or consultant if you have a master’s or doctoral degree in biology. But in any case, a biology degree is a good place to start. According to Payscale, the average starting salary for biology majors in entry-level jobs is $53K, rising to $102K for biology majors late in their careers.
Beyond many of the same basic skills you get from biology, chemistry—the study of how substances are put together as well as how they transform over time—goes into great detail on scientific ethics. Chemical testing involves a lot of complicated processes that can be potentially hazardous. Not to mention that effective results of chemical experimentation, specifically in organic chemistry, can sometimes only come from testing on living things. Being able to balance the value of safety with the need for scientific development can be fraught, and so a chemist has plenty of opportunities to wrestle with ethical questions.
Chemistry students also need to be creative. So much of the science relies on testing chemical reactions, so a chemist needs to be willing to try combinations and work from a careful combination of theories and facts to find out more about natural life. Inorganic chemistry and synthetic chemistry depend on new ways of looking at the chemical composition of objects and uncovering their unknown properties.
You will also learn to see things as the sum of their parts. Analytical chemistry includes a lot of separating substances into their components to find out how they come together. You’ll become precise in your exploration and able to see complicated patterns of structure where others only see a flat picture.
Similar to a biology major, careers in chemistry are often dependent on what area of chemistry you specialize in. Pre-health is a common path for chemistry majors, leading to careers in drug and medicine development—finding cures, therapies and even preventive measures for a wide range of diseases and physical problems.
Another popular route for chemistry majors is to get into forensic chemistry, where you can apply your skills to aid in criminal investigations. Not only will you need to be well-versed in toxicology, osteology—the study of the structure and function of the human skeleton and bones—and textile chemistry, but you’ll need to know a lot about the criminal justice system.
Chemical engineering is the area a lot of people associate most closely with chemistry. This is where you use your chemical knowledge to help produce consumer products, like food and fuel, as well as medical devices like drug delivery systems and even artificial organs. You can also work closely with architects, designing the structural elements of buildings as well as inspecting them to make sure they are safe, up to code, and structurally sound.
As with biology, there are also plenty of government and educational jobs waiting for those with a degree in chemistry. You could be a development researcher for the military or NASA, a consultant for the auto industry, or a policy specialist helping get laws written regarding drugs and other industrial materials. And of course you can research or teach at a college or university, or teach at the junior high and high school levels if you like the idea of working with younger children.
Then there is biochemistry, sometimes called biological chemistry, where these two main areas meet. This is where scientists seek an understanding of chemical reactions in biological systems. If you are interested in what happens when we or other animals eat, how four chemicals can add up to the human gene sequence of every living thing, how and why we get sick, or how blood carries so much importance in keeping the body going, then you should explore this cross-section of chemistry and biology.
Jobs in biochemistry tend to involve a lot of lab time as a researcher, but they can cross areas from medicine to drug design and pharmaceuticals to corporate work. If interested in pharmaceuticals, make sure you are aware of all the pharmacist education requirements .
Like biology careers, jobs for chemists are also on the rise, with a predicted 4% growth through 2028 , according to the BLS. That should add up to about 3,500 jobs added to the U.S. economy over 10 years. Some of the fastest-growing positions are registered nurses (12% occupational growth) and food scientists (7%).
The value of a career in chemistry is just as dependent on time in school and experience as one in biology, but unlike biologists where medicine is the most secure path, the most secure jobs for chemists are in supplying to pharmaceutical companies. Drug manufacturers are the biggest employers of chemists in the United States , according to Data USA, with more than 300,000 employees in this country making an average annual salary of more than $104K.
Government jobs are harder to come by, as you might imagine, and pay closer to an average salary over $114K. There are also successful careers to be had in architecture and engineering ($67K), research ($92K), and manufacturing of non-health-related chemicals ($88K).
Ultimately, the choice comes down to what you want to spend most of your time doing over the next few years. Both chemistry and biology will give you plenty of opportunities to learn complicated systems, perform experiments, analyze data and dig under the surface of what we observe in the world every day.
Biology includes a set of a hard and fast rules, and involves a bit more observation and noting of facts. Chemistry, meanwhile, is a bit more about trial and error, breaking things down to build them back up again. A biology major will be more likely to put you in the classroom or in the field while chemistry will have you in the lab.
There’s also the question of motivation. Certainly not always, but generally speaking, biology tends to be about the study and protection of living things. It can be plenty lucrative, but is often not geared in that direction. Chemistry, by contrast, can be more about entrepreneurship and developing products that will improve people’s lives, including yours when those products are sold. Chemists still do plenty of good for the world, too, but as a set of careers, chemistry represents goods and biology represents services.
Whichever you choose, you will want to study the subject at a reputable school with proven faculty and excellent facilities. North Central College offers degree programs in biology , chemistry and biochemistry , with top-flight internships and partnerships with some of the leading companies in America, cutting-edge technology to keep you up-to-date with the skills and expertise employers want, and opportunities to do research from your first day of college.
Find out more and learn how to apply at northcentralcollege.edu/apply .
Jacob Imm is a communications specialist in the North Central College Office of Marketing and Communications. He has 10 years of collegiate communications experience and has worked with hundreds of college students. He has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Notre Dame and a master’s degree from Northern Illinois University.
Can’t find a perfect paper?
Updated 13 July 2022
Subject Experience , Learning , School
Downloads 49
Category Education , Life
Topic Importance of Education , Middle School , Personal Experience
On the same note, I discovered that biology is the science of living things such as plants, animals, and bacteria. All in Middle School understands the distinctions between Chemistry and Biology. These are the main concepts of Chemistry and Biology, according to a layperson's interpretation. Despite their discrepancies, the two topics are related. As a result, Chemistry serves as the primary biological factor, implying that Biology does not survive without Chemistry. As a result, Chemistry and Biology are associated topics. The University of Arizona considers Chemistry as a related subject to Biology. As such, Chemistry has four elements, which make the 99 percent of all the living things. These elements are Oxygen (O), Carbon (C), Hydrogen (H), and Nitrogen (N) (The University of Arizona 1). Hence, there would be no life without the presence of these elements in the biosphere.
Hence, there are attractions, which results in the development of longer constructions, which include the foot and the hand. Furthermore, the food that living things consume comprises of Chemistry. The Chemistry helps in breaking down such foods into smaller molecules for ready absorption in the body of people.
Biology is considered as the study of living things and their interactions with the immediate environment (Region of Queens Municipality 1). Hence, biology focuses on the study of all living things as they exist within their natural environment. This is different from Chemistry since Biology aims at organs and organisms and how such organs function while Chemistry focuses on the minuscule components of the make-up of these structures in the body of living things.
For example, Chemistry assists in making clarifications as to why a dog looks different from a cat by taking into consideration of the genetic composition of these animals. Chemist professionals embark on natural diversity to develop polymers, designs, and pharmaceutical synthesis that help in the environmental protection and the development of other alternatives of energy sources in society (Region of Queens Municipality 1). On the other hand, Biology assists in understanding the structural difference between a dog and a cat in relation to lineage. Thus, biologists utilize a hierarchy of biological organization to illustrate the connectivity and the position of all the living things. The hierarchy begins from the molecules to the cells of the organisms, which are present in the ecosystem of both animals and plants (Region of Queens Municipality 1).
As such, Chemistry is the key life component, which dictates the existence of people in society. It acts as the key factor for people to eat food and for such food to nourish human bodies. The genetic make-up of a living organism determines how Chemistry helps in the production of different structures.
Region of Queens Municipality. Biology and Chemistry. Web. 2nd Feb, 2017.
The University of Arizona. Department of biochemistry and molecular biophysics.
Deadline is approaching?
Wait no more. Let us write you an essay from scratch
Related topics.
Find Out the Cost of Your Paper
Type your email
By clicking “Submit”, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy policy. Sometimes you will receive account related emails.
This database requires all users to be logged in with one of their accounts. To get access to the registration link, please contact [email protected] .
PLOS is a nonprofit, Open Access publisher empowering researchers to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication.
This link will take you to a catalog results page for all chemistry, biology, and molecular biology journal results.
Note that if a call number / location of an item says "Offsite Storage" this means it is in a secured location. If you want to view an item from Offsite Storage, visit TheDesk in Roy O. West and provide the item you are looking for. Since they will need to go to Julian to retrieve the item it can take a few minutes. Note, that it will help them find your item as efficiently as possible if you provide the exact journal name, issue, and volume number.
COMMENTS
Genetics, nutrition, environmental biology and molecular biology are the main aspects of biology that interest me. In Chemistry, I find great interest in Biochemistry as it is the study of life. My interest in these aspects is largely drawn from my life in the slums of Peru. Having been brought up in the slums of Peru, I have witnessed the ...
collaboration between biology and chemistry is essential for developing sustainable practices that protect both human health and the environment. ### Conclusion The correlation between biology and chemistry is profound and essential for advancing our understanding of life and its complexities. From the biochemical processes that sustain life to the development of medical therapies and the ...
This is because biology is the study of life and all living things consists of atoms and molecules. Specifically, life depends on carbon or organic chemistry. Proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) are all organic molecules. Sometimes the relationship between chemistry and biology isn't immediately obvious.
The term biochemistry is synonymous with two somewhat older terms: physiological chemistry and biological chemistry. Those aspects of biochemistry that deal with the chemistry and function of very large molecules (e.g., proteins and nucleic acids) are often grouped under the term molecular biology. Biochemistry has been known under that term ...
High. Biology. 8%. Moderate. According to the data, both chemistry and biology offer solid salary growth. However, biology has a slightly higher average salary growth rate at 8%, compared to chemistry's 6%. Additionally, the job market demand for both fields is generally high, with biology having a moderate demand.
Biochemistry or biological chemistry is the study of chemical processes within and relating to living organisms. [1] A sub-discipline of both chemistry and biology, biochemistry may be divided into three fields: structural biology, enzymology, and metabolism.Over the last decades of the 20th century, biochemistry has become successful at explaining living processes through these three disciplines.
Provide a description of the experimental design, including controls, variables, and procedures. Add the list of materials and equipment used. Explain how data was collected and recorded. This part of the essay will be solid proof of your no-plagiarism work. Results - think of the way you are going to display the results of your research and ...
Check our 100% free biology essay examples & ideas for short and extended biology essays. Learn how to start a biology essay & other tips. IvyPanda® Free Essays. Clear. Free Essays; Study Hub. ... Biochemistry is an application of chemistry to the study of biological processes on cell and molecular levels. It is a cross-discipline between ...
Of the 28 essential elements, 11 make up 99.9% of the atoms in the human body. The other 17 are known as trace elements and are present in very small amounts, ranging from a milligram to gram quantities in an adult human. Figure 1. View large Download slide. Periodic table illustrating the elements essential for life.
This essay considers how scholarly approaches to the development of molecular biology have too often narrowed the historical aperture to genes, overlooking the ways in which other objects and processes contributed to the molecularization of life. ... has been examining the historical implementation of molecular biology and chemistry in ...
Biology Personal Statement Example 11. University has always appealed to me because of the wealth of experiences it has to offer as a student. Although I enjoy Computing and Chemistry: two of my 'A level' subjects, I am especially keen to study Biology and Psychology... Biology Personal Statement Example 12.
The field of biochemistry stands at the intersection of biology and chemistry, unraveling the intricate molecular processes that underlie life itself. This essay delves into the personal motivations that drive my choice of a biochemistry major, examining how my intellectual curiosity and career aspirations converge in this captivating ...
Biochemistry is the study of the structure and function of biological molecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates and lipids. Biochemistry is also used to describe techniques suited ...
The Basics of General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry by David W. Ball, John W. Hill, and Rhonda J. Scott is for the one-semester General, Organic and Biological Chemistry course. The authors designed this textbook from the ground up to meet the needs of a one-semester course. It is 20 chapters in length and approximately 350-400 pages; just the right breadth and depth for instructors to ...
Chemical biology is the study of the chemicals and chemical reactions involved in biological processes, incorporating the disciplines of bioorganic chemistry, biochemistry, cell biology and ...
Body of the essay. Conclusion. References and bibliography. Additionally, your research topic must fall into one of the six approved DP categories, or IB subject groups, which are as follows: Group 1: Studies in Language and Literature. Group 2: Language Acquisition. Group 3: Individuals and Societies. Group 4: Sciences.
Biochemistry is vital for the study of cells, disease, and medicine, as well as in diverse fields such as genetics and agriculture. Chemical biology spans the fields of chemistry and biology, applying core chemical techniques, analysis, and synthetic chemistry to the study and manipulation of biological systems, which may be used in cell ...
Extended Essay Research Guide; ... Biology. Biology (2018 new rubric) Biology Light Intensity. Does Age Have an Effect on Short-term Memory of 6 to 18 Year Old Students? Biology 1. Chemistry: Chemistry 1. What are the Alternative Fuels for the Depleting Fossil Fuels and which is the Best Fuel in Accordance with the Energy Output? A Copper Ions ...
Biology, study of living things and their vital processes that deals with all the physicochemical aspects of life. Modern principles of other fields, such as chemistry, medicine, and physics, for example, are integrated with those of biology in areas such as biochemistry, biomedicine, and biophysics.
A biology major will be more likely to put you in the classroom or in the field while chemistry will have you in the lab. There's also the question of motivation. Certainly not always, but generally speaking, biology tends to be about the study and protection of living things. It can be plenty lucrative, but is often not geared in that direction.
Biology and Chemistry focuses on the study of life, but in different perspectives. Biology is considered as the study of living things and their interactions with the immediate environment (Region of Queens Municipality 1). Hence, biology focuses on the study of all living things as they exist within their natural environment.
Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences.High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or ...
This link will take you to a catalog results page for all chemistry, biology, and molecular biology journal results. Note that if a call number / location of an item says "Offsite Storage" this means it is in a secured location. If you want to view an item from Offsite Storage, visit TheDesk in Roy O. West and provide the item you are looking for.