definition of review of literature in research by different authors

• University of Texas Libraries

Literature Reviews

• What is a literature review?
• Steps in the Literature Review Process
• Define your research question
• Determine inclusion and exclusion criteria
• Choose databases and search
• Review Results
• Synthesize Results
• Analyze Results
• Librarian Support
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools

What is a Literature Review?

A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research question. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important past and current research and practices. It provides background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field. 

A literature review should: 

• Provide a comprehensive and updated review of the literature;
• Explain why this review has taken place;
• Articulate a position or hypothesis;
• Acknowledge and account for conflicting and corroborating points of view

From  S age Research Methods

Purpose of a Literature Review

A literature review can be written as an introduction to a study to:

• Demonstrate how a study fills a gap in research
• Compare a study with other research that's been done

Or it can be a separate work (a research article on its own) which:

• Organizes or describes a topic
• Describes variables within a particular issue/problem

Limitations of a Literature Review

Some of the limitations of a literature review are:

• It's a snapshot in time. Unlike other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an end. There may be future developments that could make your work less relevant.
• It may be too focused. Some niche studies may miss the bigger picture.
• It can be difficult to be comprehensive. There is no way to make sure all the literature on a topic was considered.
• It is easy to be biased if you stick to top tier journals. There may be other places where people are publishing exemplary research. Look to open access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. Also, make sure to include opposing views (and not just supporting evidence).

Source: Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information & Libraries Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, June 2009, pp. 91–108. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.

Librarian Assistance

For help, please contact the librarian for your subject area.  We have a guide to library specialists by subject .

• Last Updated: Aug 26, 2024 5:59 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/literaturereviews

• Subject List
• Take a Tour
• For Authors
• Subscriber Services
• Publications
• African American Studies
• African Studies
• American Literature
• Anthropology
• Architecture Planning and Preservation
• Art History
• Atlantic History
• Biblical Studies
• British and Irish Literature
• Childhood Studies
• Chinese Studies
• Cinema and Media Studies
• Communication
• Criminology
• Environmental Science
• Evolutionary Biology
• International Law
• International Relations
• Islamic Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Latino Studies
• Linguistics
• Literary and Critical Theory
• Medieval Studies
• Military History
• Political Science
• Public Health
• Renaissance and Reformation
• Social Work
• Urban Studies
• Victorian Literature
• Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

• Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Literature Reviews

Introduction, what is a literature review.

• Literature Reviews for Thesis or Dissertation
• Stand-alone and Systemic Reviews
• Purposes of a Literature Review
• Texts on Conducting a Literature Review
• Identifying the Research Topic
• The Persuasive Argument
• Searching the Literature
• Creating a Synthesis
• Critiquing the Literature
• Building the Case for the Literature Review Document
• Presenting the Literature Review

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

About related articles close popup.

Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.

• Higher Education Research
• Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis in Education
• Methodologies for Conducting Education Research
• Mixed Methods Research
• Philosophy of Education
• Politics of Education
• Qualitative Data Analysis Techniques

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

• Cyber Safety in Schools
• Girls' Education in the Developing World
• History of Education in Europe
• Find more forthcoming articles...
• Export Citations
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Literature Reviews by Lawrence A. Machi , Brenda T. McEvoy LAST REVIEWED: 27 October 2016 LAST MODIFIED: 27 October 2016 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0169

Literature reviews play a foundational role in the development and execution of a research project. They provide access to the academic conversation surrounding the topic of the proposed study. By engaging in this scholarly exercise, the researcher is able to learn and to share knowledge about the topic. The literature review acts as the springboard for new research, in that it lays out a logically argued case, founded on a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge about the topic. The case produced provides the justification for the research question or problem of a proposed study, and the methodological scheme best suited to conduct the research. It can also be a research project in itself, arguing policy or practice implementation, based on a comprehensive analysis of the research in a field. The term literature review can refer to the output or the product of a review. It can also refer to the process of Conducting a Literature Review . Novice researchers, when attempting their first research projects, tend to ask two questions: What is a Literature Review? How do you do one? While this annotated bibliography is neither definitive nor exhaustive in its treatment of the subject, it is designed to provide a beginning researcher, who is pursuing an academic degree, an entry point for answering the two previous questions. The article is divided into two parts. The first four sections of the article provide a general overview of the topic. They address definitions, types, purposes, and processes for doing a literature review. The second part presents the process and procedures for doing a literature review. Arranged in a sequential fashion, the remaining eight sections provide references addressing each step of the literature review process. References included in this article were selected based on their ability to assist the beginning researcher. Additionally, the authors attempted to include texts from various disciplines in social science to present various points of view on the subject.

Novice researchers often have a misguided perception of how to do a literature review and what the document should contain. Literature reviews are not narrative annotated bibliographies nor book reports (see Bruce 1994 ). Their form, function, and outcomes vary, due to how they depend on the research question, the standards and criteria of the academic discipline, and the orthodoxies of the research community charged with the research. The term literature review can refer to the process of doing a review as well as the product resulting from conducting a review. The product resulting from reviewing the literature is the concern of this section. Literature reviews for research studies at the master’s and doctoral levels have various definitions. Machi and McEvoy 2016 presents a general definition of a literature review. Lambert 2012 defines a literature review as a critical analysis of what is known about the study topic, the themes related to it, and the various perspectives expressed regarding the topic. Fink 2010 defines a literature review as a systematic review of existing body of data that identifies, evaluates, and synthesizes for explicit presentation. Jesson, et al. 2011 defines the literature review as a critical description and appraisal of a topic. Hart 1998 sees the literature review as producing two products: the presentation of information, ideas, data, and evidence to express viewpoints on the nature of the topic, as well as how it is to be investigated. When considering literature reviews beyond the novice level, Ridley 2012 defines and differentiates the systematic review from literature reviews associated with primary research conducted in academic degree programs of study, including stand-alone literature reviews. Cooper 1998 states the product of literature review is dependent on the research study’s goal and focus, and defines synthesis reviews as literature reviews that seek to summarize and draw conclusions from past empirical research to determine what issues have yet to be resolved. Theoretical reviews compare and contrast the predictive ability of theories that explain the phenomenon, arguing which theory holds the most validity in describing the nature of that phenomenon. Grant and Booth 2009 identified fourteen types of reviews used in both degree granting and advanced research projects, describing their attributes and methodologies.

Bruce, Christine Susan. 1994. Research students’ early experiences of the dissertation literature review. Studies in Higher Education 19.2: 217–229.

DOI: 10.1080/03075079412331382057

A phenomenological analysis was conducted with forty-one neophyte research scholars. The responses to the questions, “What do you mean when you use the words literature review?” and “What is the meaning of a literature review for your research?” identified six concepts. The results conclude that doing a literature review is a problem area for students.

Cooper, Harris. 1998. Synthesizing research . Vol. 2. 3d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

The introductory chapter of this text provides a cogent explanation of Cooper’s understanding of literature reviews. Chapter 4 presents a comprehensive discussion of the synthesis review. Chapter 5 discusses meta-analysis and depth.

Fink, Arlene. 2010. Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper . 3d ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

The first chapter of this text (pp. 1–16) provides a short but clear discussion of what a literature review is in reference to its application to a broad range of social sciences disciplines and their related professions.

Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. 2009. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal 26.2: 91–108. Print.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

This article reports a scoping review that was conducted using the “Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis” (SALSA) framework. Fourteen literature review types and associated methodology make up the resulting typology. Each type is described by its key characteristics and analyzed for its strengths and weaknesses.

Hart, Chris. 1998. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination . London: SAGE.

Chapter 1 of this text explains Hart’s definition of a literature review. Additionally, it describes the roles of the literature review, the skills of a literature reviewer, and the research context for a literature review. Of note is Hart’s discussion of the literature review requirements for master’s degree and doctoral degree work.

Jesson, Jill, Lydia Matheson, and Fiona M. Lacey. 2011. Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques . Los Angeles: SAGE.

Chapter 1: “Preliminaries” provides definitions of traditional and systematic reviews. It discusses the differences between them. Chapter 5 is dedicated to explaining the traditional review, while Chapter 7 explains the systematic review. Chapter 8 provides a detailed description of meta-analysis.

Lambert, Mike. 2012. A beginner’s guide to doing your education research project . Los Angeles: SAGE.

Chapter 6 (pp. 79–100) presents a thumbnail sketch for doing a literature review.

Machi, Lawrence A., and Brenda T. McEvoy. 2016. The literature review: Six steps to success . 3d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

The introduction of this text differentiates between a simple and an advanced review and concisely defines a literature review.

Ridley, Diana. 2012. The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students . 2d ed. Sage Study Skills. London: SAGE.

In the introductory chapter, Ridley reviews many definitions of the literature review, literature reviews at the master’s and doctoral level, and placement of literature reviews within the thesis or dissertation document. She also defines and differentiates literature reviews produced for degree-affiliated research from the more advanced systematic review projects.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

• About Education »
• Meet the Editorial Board »
• Academic Achievement
• Academic Audit for Universities
• Academic Freedom and Tenure in the United States
• Action Research in Education
• Adjuncts in Higher Education in the United States
• Administrator Preparation
• Adolescence
• Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Courses
• Advocacy and Activism in Early Childhood
• African American Racial Identity and Learning
• Alaska Native Education
• Alternative Certification Programs for Educators
• Alternative Schools
• American Indian Education
• Animals in Environmental Education
• Art Education
• Artificial Intelligence and Learning
• Assessing School Leader Effectiveness
• Assessment, Behavioral
• Assessment, Educational
• Assessment in Early Childhood Education
• Assistive Technology
• Augmented Reality in Education
• Beginning-Teacher Induction
• Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
• Black Undergraduate Women: Critical Race and Gender Perspe...
• Black Women in Academia
• Blended Learning
• Case Study in Education Research
• Changing Professional and Academic Identities
• Character Education
• Children’s and Young Adult Literature
• Children's Beliefs about Intelligence
• Children's Rights in Early Childhood Education
• Citizenship Education
• Civic and Social Engagement of Higher Education
• Classroom Learning Environments: Assessing and Investigati...
• Classroom Management
• Coherent Instructional Systems at the School and School Sy...
• College Admissions in the United States
• College Athletics in the United States
• Community Relations
• Comparative Education
• Computer-Assisted Language Learning
• Computer-Based Testing
• Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Evaluating Improvement Net...
• Continuous Improvement and "High Leverage" Educational Pro...
• Counseling in Schools
• Critical Approaches to Gender in Higher Education
• Critical Perspectives on Educational Innovation and Improv...
• Critical Race Theory
• Crossborder and Transnational Higher Education
• Cross-National Research on Continuous Improvement
• Cross-Sector Research on Continuous Learning and Improveme...
• Cultural Diversity in Early Childhood Education
• Culturally Responsive Leadership
• Culturally Responsive Pedagogies
• Culturally Responsive Teacher Education in the United Stat...
• Curriculum Design
• Data Collection in Educational Research
• Data-driven Decision Making in the United States
• Deaf Education
• Desegregation and Integration
• Design Thinking and the Learning Sciences: Theoretical, Pr...
• Development, Moral
• Dialogic Pedagogy
• Digital Age Teacher, The
• Digital Citizenship
• Digital Divides
• Disabilities
• Distance Learning
• Distributed Leadership
• Doctoral Education and Training
• Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) in Denmark
• Early Childhood Education and Development in Mexico
• Early Childhood Education in Aotearoa New Zealand
• Early Childhood Education in Australia
• Early Childhood Education in China
• Early Childhood Education in Europe
• Early Childhood Education in Sub-Saharan Africa
• Early Childhood Education in Sweden
• Early Childhood Education Pedagogy
• Early Childhood Education Policy
• Early Childhood Education, The Arts in
• Early Childhood Mathematics
• Early Childhood Science
• Early Childhood Teacher Education
• Early Childhood Teachers in Aotearoa New Zealand
• Early Years Professionalism and Professionalization Polici...
• Economics of Education
• Education For Children with Autism
• Education for Sustainable Development
• Education Leadership, Empirical Perspectives in
• Education of Native Hawaiian Students
• Education Reform and School Change
• Educational Research Approaches: A Comparison
• Educational Statistics for Longitudinal Research
• Educator Partnerships with Parents and Families with a Foc...
• Emotional and Affective Issues in Environmental and Sustai...
• Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
• English as an International Language for Academic Publishi...
• Environmental and Science Education: Overlaps and Issues
• Environmental Education
• Environmental Education in Brazil
• Epistemic Beliefs
• Equity and Improvement: Engaging Communities in Educationa...
• Equity, Ethnicity, Diversity, and Excellence in Education
• Ethical Research with Young Children
• Ethics and Education
• Ethics of Teaching
• Ethnic Studies
• Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
• Family and Community Partnerships in Education
• Family Day Care
• Federal Government Programs and Issues
• Feminization of Labor in Academia
• Finance, Education
• Financial Aid
• Formative Assessment
• Future-Focused Education
• Gender and Achievement
• Gender and Alternative Education
• Gender, Power and Politics in the Academy
• Gender-Based Violence on University Campuses
• Gifted Education
• Global Mindedness and Global Citizenship Education
• Global University Rankings
• Governance, Education
• Grounded Theory
• Growth of Effective Mental Health Services in Schools in t...
• Higher Education and Globalization
• Higher Education and the Developing World
• Higher Education Faculty Characteristics and Trends in the...
• Higher Education Finance
• Higher Education Governance
• Higher Education Graduate Outcomes and Destinations
• Higher Education in Africa
• Higher Education in China
• Higher Education in Latin America
• Higher Education in the United States, Historical Evolutio...
• Higher Education, International Issues in
• Higher Education Management
• Higher Education Policy
• Higher Education Student Assessment
• High-stakes Testing
• History of Early Childhood Education in the United States
• History of Education in the United States
• History of Technology Integration in Education
• Homeschooling
• Inclusion in Early Childhood: Difference, Disability, and ...
• Inclusive Education
• Indigenous Education in a Global Context
• Indigenous Learning Environments
• Indigenous Students in Higher Education in the United Stat...
• Infant and Toddler Pedagogy
• Inservice Teacher Education
• Integrating Art across the Curriculum
• Intelligence
• Intensive Interventions for Children and Adolescents with ...
• International Perspectives on Academic Freedom
• Intersectionality and Education
• Knowledge Development in Early Childhood
• Leadership Development, Coaching and Feedback for
• Leadership in Early Childhood Education
• Leadership Training with an Emphasis on the United States
• Learning Analytics in Higher Education
• Learning Difficulties
• Learning, Lifelong
• Learning, Multimedia
• Learning Strategies
• Legal Matters and Education Law
• LGBT Youth in Schools
• Linguistic Diversity
• Linguistically Inclusive Pedagogy
• Literacy Development and Language Acquisition
• Literature Reviews
• Mathematics Identity
• Mathematics Instruction and Interventions for Students wit...
• Mathematics Teacher Education
• Measurement for Improvement in Education
• Measurement in Education in the United States
• Methodological Approaches for Impact Evaluation in Educati...
• Mindfulness, Learning, and Education
• Motherscholars
• Multiliteracies in Early Childhood Education
• Multiple Documents Literacy: Theory, Research, and Applica...
• Multivariate Research Methodology
• Museums, Education, and Curriculum
• Music Education
• Narrative Research in Education
• Native American Studies
• Nonformal and Informal Environmental Education
• Note-Taking
• Numeracy Education
• One-to-One Technology in the K-12 Classroom
• Online Education
• Open Education
• Organizing for Continuous Improvement in Education
• Organizing Schools for the Inclusion of Students with Disa...
• Outdoor Play and Learning
• Outdoor Play and Learning in Early Childhood Education
• Pedagogical Leadership
• Pedagogy of Teacher Education, A
• Performance Objectives and Measurement
• Performance-based Research Assessment in Higher Education
• Performance-based Research Funding
• Phenomenology in Educational Research
• Physical Education
• Podcasts in Education
• Policy Context of United States Educational Innovation and...
• Portable Technology Use in Special Education Programs and ...
• Post-humanism and Environmental Education
• Pre-Service Teacher Education
• Problem Solving
• Productivity and Higher Education
• Professional Development
• Professional Learning Communities
• Program Evaluation
• Programs and Services for Students with Emotional or Behav...
• Psychology Learning and Teaching
• Psychometric Issues in the Assessment of English Language ...
• Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research Samp...
• Qualitative Research Design
• Quantitative Research Designs in Educational Research
• Queering the English Language Arts (ELA) Writing Classroom
• Race and Affirmative Action in Higher Education
• Reading Education
• Refugee and New Immigrant Learners
• Relational and Developmental Trauma and Schools
• Relational Pedagogies in Early Childhood Education
• Reliability in Educational Assessments
• Religion in Elementary and Secondary Education in the Unit...
• Researcher Development and Skills Training within the Cont...
• Research-Practice Partnerships in Education within the Uni...
• Response to Intervention
• Restorative Practices
• Risky Play in Early Childhood Education
• Role of Gender Equity Work on University Campuses through ...
• Scale and Sustainability of Education Innovation and Impro...
• Scaling Up Research-based Educational Practices
• School Accreditation
• School Choice
• School Culture
• School District Budgeting and Financial Management in the ...
• School Improvement through Inclusive Education
• School Reform
• Schools, Private and Independent
• School-Wide Positive Behavior Support
• Science Education
• Secondary to Postsecondary Transition Issues
• Self-Regulated Learning
• Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices
• Service-Learning
• Severe Disabilities
• Single Salary Schedule
• Single-sex Education
• Single-Subject Research Design
• Social Context of Education
• Social Justice
• Social Network Analysis
• Social Pedagogy
• Social Science and Education Research
• Social Studies Education
• Sociology of Education
• Standards-Based Education
• Statistical Assumptions
• Student Access, Equity, and Diversity in Higher Education
• Student Assignment Policy
• Student Engagement in Tertiary Education
• Student Learning, Development, Engagement, and Motivation ...
• Student Participation
• Student Voice in Teacher Development
• Sustainability Education in Early Childhood Education
• Sustainability in Early Childhood Education
• Sustainability in Higher Education
• Teacher Beliefs and Epistemologies
• Teacher Collaboration in School Improvement
• Teacher Evaluation and Teacher Effectiveness
• Teacher Preparation
• Teacher Training and Development
• Teacher Unions and Associations
• Teacher-Student Relationships
• Teaching Critical Thinking
• Technologies, Teaching, and Learning in Higher Education
• Technology Education in Early Childhood
• Technology, Educational
• Technology-based Assessment
• The Bologna Process
• The Regulation of Standards in Higher Education
• Theories of Educational Leadership
• Three Conceptions of Literacy: Media, Narrative, and Gamin...
• Tracking and Detracking
• Traditions of Quality Improvement in Education
• Transformative Learning
• Transitions in Early Childhood Education
• Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities in the Unite...
• Understanding the Psycho-Social Dimensions of Schools and ...
• University Faculty Roles and Responsibilities in the Unite...
• Using Ethnography in Educational Research
• Value of Higher Education for Students and Other Stakehold...
• Virtual Learning Environments
• Vocational and Technical Education
• Wellness and Well-Being in Education
• Women's and Gender Studies
• Young Children and Spirituality
• Young Children's Learning Dispositions
• Young Children's Working Theories
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility

Powered by:

• [185.80.151.9]
• 185.80.151.9

Libraries | Research Guides

Literature reviews, what is a literature review, learning more about how to do a literature review.

• Planning the Review
• The Research Question
• Choosing Where to Search
• Organizing the Review
• Writing the Review

A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it relates to your research question. A literature review goes beyond a description or summary of the literature you have read. 

• Sage Research Methods Core This link opens in a new window SAGE Research Methods supports research at all levels by providing material to guide users through every step of the research process. SAGE Research Methods is the ultimate methods library with more than 1000 books, reference works, journal articles, and instructional videos by world-leading academics from across the social sciences, including the largest collection of qualitative methods books available online from any scholarly publisher. – Publisher

• Next: Planning the Review >>
• Last Updated: Jul 8, 2024 11:22 AM
• URL: https://libguides.northwestern.edu/literaturereviews

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Clinics (Sao Paulo)

Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Review Checklist

Debora f.b. leite.

I Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, BR

II Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, PE, BR

III Hospital das Clinicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, PE, BR

Maria Auxiliadora Soares Padilha

Jose g. cecatti.

A sophisticated literature review (LR) can result in a robust dissertation/thesis by scrutinizing the main problem examined by the academic study; anticipating research hypotheses, methods and results; and maintaining the interest of the audience in how the dissertation/thesis will provide solutions for the current gaps in a particular field. Unfortunately, little guidance is available on elaborating LRs, and writing an LR chapter is not a linear process. An LR translates students’ abilities in information literacy, the language domain, and critical writing. Students in postgraduate programs should be systematically trained in these skills. Therefore, this paper discusses the purposes of LRs in dissertations and theses. Second, the paper considers five steps for developing a review: defining the main topic, searching the literature, analyzing the results, writing the review and reflecting on the writing. Ultimately, this study proposes a twelve-item LR checklist. By clearly stating the desired achievements, this checklist allows Masters and Ph.D. students to continuously assess their own progress in elaborating an LR. Institutions aiming to strengthen students’ necessary skills in critical academic writing should also use this tool.

INTRODUCTION

Writing the literature review (LR) is often viewed as a difficult task that can be a point of writer’s block and procrastination ( 1 ) in postgraduate life. Disagreements on the definitions or classifications of LRs ( 2 ) may confuse students about their purpose and scope, as well as how to perform an LR. Interestingly, at many universities, the LR is still an important element in any academic work, despite the more recent trend of producing scientific articles rather than classical theses.

The LR is not an isolated section of the thesis/dissertation or a copy of the background section of a research proposal. It identifies the state-of-the-art knowledge in a particular field, clarifies information that is already known, elucidates implications of the problem being analyzed, links theory and practice ( 3 - 5 ), highlights gaps in the current literature, and places the dissertation/thesis within the research agenda of that field. Additionally, by writing the LR, postgraduate students will comprehend the structure of the subject and elaborate on their cognitive connections ( 3 ) while analyzing and synthesizing data with increasing maturity.

At the same time, the LR transforms the student and hints at the contents of other chapters for the reader. First, the LR explains the research question; second, it supports the hypothesis, objectives, and methods of the research project; and finally, it facilitates a description of the student’s interpretation of the results and his/her conclusions. For scholars, the LR is an introductory chapter ( 6 ). If it is well written, it demonstrates the student’s understanding of and maturity in a particular topic. A sound and sophisticated LR can indicate a robust dissertation/thesis.

A consensus on the best method to elaborate a dissertation/thesis has not been achieved. The LR can be a distinct chapter or included in different sections; it can be part of the introduction chapter, part of each research topic, or part of each published paper ( 7 ). However, scholars view the LR as an integral part of the main body of an academic work because it is intrinsically connected to other sections ( Figure 1 ) and is frequently present. The structure of the LR depends on the conventions of a particular discipline, the rules of the department, and the student’s and supervisor’s areas of expertise, needs and interests.

Interestingly, many postgraduate students choose to submit their LR to peer-reviewed journals. As LRs are critical evaluations of current knowledge, they are indeed publishable material, even in the form of narrative or systematic reviews. However, systematic reviews have specific patterns 1 ( 8 ) that may not entirely fit with the questions posed in the dissertation/thesis. Additionally, the scope of a systematic review may be too narrow, and the strict criteria for study inclusion may omit important information from the dissertation/thesis. Therefore, this essay discusses the definition of an LR is and methods to develop an LR in the context of an academic dissertation/thesis. Finally, we suggest a checklist to evaluate an LR.

WHAT IS A LITERATURE REVIEW IN A THESIS?

Conducting research and writing a dissertation/thesis translates rational thinking and enthusiasm ( 9 ). While a strong body of literature that instructs students on research methodology, data analysis and writing scientific papers exists, little guidance on performing LRs is available. The LR is a unique opportunity to assess and contrast various arguments and theories, not just summarize them. The research results should not be discussed within the LR, but the postgraduate student tends to write a comprehensive LR while reflecting on his or her own findings ( 10 ).

Many people believe that writing an LR is a lonely and linear process. Supervisors or the institutions assume that the Ph.D. student has mastered the relevant techniques and vocabulary associated with his/her subject and conducts a self-reflection about previously published findings. Indeed, while elaborating the LR, the student should aggregate diverse skills, which mainly rely on his/her own commitment to mastering them. Thus, less supervision should be required ( 11 ). However, the parameters described above might not currently be the case for many students ( 11 , 12 ), and the lack of formal and systematic training on writing LRs is an important concern ( 11 ).

An institutional environment devoted to active learning will provide students the opportunity to continuously reflect on LRs, which will form a dialogue between the postgraduate student and the current literature in a particular field ( 13 ). Postgraduate students will be interpreting studies by other researchers, and, according to Hart (1998) ( 3 ), the outcomes of the LR in a dissertation/thesis include the following:

• To identify what research has been performed and what topics require further investigation in a particular field of knowledge;
• To determine the context of the problem;
• To recognize the main methodologies and techniques that have been used in the past;
• To place the current research project within the historical, methodological and theoretical context of a particular field;
• To identify significant aspects of the topic;
• To elucidate the implications of the topic;
• To offer an alternative perspective;
• To discern how the studied subject is structured;
• To improve the student’s subject vocabulary in a particular field; and
• To characterize the links between theory and practice.

A sound LR translates the postgraduate student’s expertise in academic and scientific writing: it expresses his/her level of comfort with synthesizing ideas ( 11 ). The LR reveals how well the postgraduate student has proceeded in three domains: an effective literature search, the language domain, and critical writing.

Effective literature search

All students should be trained in gathering appropriate data for specific purposes, and information literacy skills are a cornerstone. These skills are defined as “an individual’s ability to know when they need information, to identify information that can help them address the issue or problem at hand, and to locate, evaluate, and use that information effectively” ( 14 ). Librarian support is of vital importance in coaching the appropriate use of Boolean logic (AND, OR, NOT) and other tools for highly efficient literature searches (e.g., quotation marks and truncation), as is the appropriate management of electronic databases.

Language domain

Academic writing must be concise and precise: unnecessary words distract the reader from the essential content ( 15 ). In this context, reading about issues distant from the research topic ( 16 ) may increase students’ general vocabulary and familiarity with grammar. Ultimately, reading diverse materials facilitates and encourages the writing process itself.

Critical writing

Critical judgment includes critical reading, thinking and writing. It supposes a student’s analytical reflection about what he/she has read. The student should delineate the basic elements of the topic, characterize the most relevant claims, identify relationships, and finally contrast those relationships ( 17 ). Each scientific document highlights the perspective of the author, and students will become more confident in judging the supporting evidence and underlying premises of a study and constructing their own counterargument as they read more articles. A paucity of integration or contradictory perspectives indicates lower levels of cognitive complexity ( 12 ).

Thus, while elaborating an LR, the postgraduate student should achieve the highest category of Bloom’s cognitive skills: evaluation ( 12 ). The writer should not only summarize data and understand each topic but also be able to make judgments based on objective criteria, compare resources and findings, identify discrepancies due to methodology, and construct his/her own argument ( 12 ). As a result, the student will be sufficiently confident to show his/her own voice .

Writing a consistent LR is an intense and complex activity that reveals the training and long-lasting academic skills of a writer. It is not a lonely or linear process. However, students are unlikely to be prepared to write an LR if they have not mastered the aforementioned domains ( 10 ). An institutional environment that supports student learning is crucial.

Different institutions employ distinct methods to promote students’ learning processes. First, many universities propose modules to develop behind the scenes activities that enhance self-reflection about general skills (e.g., the skills we have mastered and the skills we need to develop further), behaviors that should be incorporated (e.g., self-criticism about one’s own thoughts), and each student’s role in the advancement of his/her field. Lectures or workshops about LRs themselves are useful because they describe the purposes of the LR and how it fits into the whole picture of a student’s work. These activities may explain what type of discussion an LR must involve, the importance of defining the correct scope, the reasons to include a particular resource, and the main role of critical reading.

Some pedagogic services that promote a continuous improvement in study and academic skills are equally important. Examples include workshops about time management, the accomplishment of personal objectives, active learning, and foreign languages for nonnative speakers. Additionally, opportunities to converse with other students promotes an awareness of others’ experiences and difficulties. Ultimately, the supervisor’s role in providing feedback and setting deadlines is crucial in developing students’ abilities and in strengthening students’ writing quality ( 12 ).

HOW SHOULD A LITERATURE REVIEW BE DEVELOPED?

A consensus on the appropriate method for elaborating an LR is not available, but four main steps are generally accepted: defining the main topic, searching the literature, analyzing the results, and writing ( 6 ). We suggest a fifth step: reflecting on the information that has been written in previous publications ( Figure 2 ).

First step: Defining the main topic

Planning an LR is directly linked to the research main question of the thesis and occurs in parallel to students’ training in the three domains discussed above. The planning stage helps organize ideas, delimit the scope of the LR ( 11 ), and avoid the wasting of time in the process. Planning includes the following steps:

• Reflecting on the scope of the LR: postgraduate students will have assumptions about what material must be addressed and what information is not essential to an LR ( 13 , 18 ). Cooper’s Taxonomy of Literature Reviews 2 systematizes the writing process through six characteristics and nonmutually exclusive categories. The focus refers to the reviewer’s most important points of interest, while the goals concern what students want to achieve with the LR. The perspective assumes answers to the student’s own view of the LR and how he/she presents a particular issue. The coverage defines how comprehensive the student is in presenting the literature, and the organization determines the sequence of arguments. The audience is defined as the group for whom the LR is written.
• Designating sections and subsections: Headings and subheadings should be specific, explanatory and have a coherent sequence throughout the text ( 4 ). They simulate an inverted pyramid, with an increasing level of reflection and depth of argument.
• Identifying keywords: The relevant keywords for each LR section should be listed to guide the literature search. This list should mirror what Hart (1998) ( 3 ) advocates as subject vocabulary . The keywords will also be useful when the student is writing the LR since they guide the reader through the text.
• Delineating the time interval and language of documents to be retrieved in the second step. The most recently published documents should be considered, but relevant texts published before a predefined cutoff year can be included if they are classic documents in that field. Extra care should be employed when translating documents.

Second step: Searching the literature

The ability to gather adequate information from the literature must be addressed in postgraduate programs. Librarian support is important, particularly for accessing difficult texts. This step comprises the following components:

• Searching the literature itself: This process consists of defining which databases (electronic or dissertation/thesis repositories), official documents, and books will be searched and then actively conducting the search. Information literacy skills have a central role in this stage. While searching electronic databases, controlled vocabulary (e.g., Medical Subject Headings, or MeSH, for the PubMed database) or specific standardized syntax rules may need to be applied.

In addition, two other approaches are suggested. First, a review of the reference list of each document might be useful for identifying relevant publications to be included and important opinions to be assessed. This step is also relevant for referencing the original studies and leading authors in that field. Moreover, students can directly contact the experts on a particular topic to consult with them regarding their experience or use them as a source of additional unpublished documents.

Before submitting a dissertation/thesis, the electronic search strategy should be repeated. This process will ensure that the most recently published papers will be considered in the LR.

• Selecting documents for inclusion: Generally, the most recent literature will be included in the form of published peer-reviewed papers. Assess books and unpublished material, such as conference abstracts, academic texts and government reports, are also important to assess since the gray literature also offers valuable information. However, since these materials are not peer-reviewed, we recommend that they are carefully added to the LR.

This task is an important exercise in time management. First, students should read the title and abstract to understand whether that document suits their purposes, addresses the research question, and helps develop the topic of interest. Then, they should scan the full text, determine how it is structured, group it with similar documents, and verify whether other arguments might be considered ( 5 ).

Third step: Analyzing the results

Critical reading and thinking skills are important in this step. This step consists of the following components:

• Reading documents: The student may read various texts in depth according to LR sections and subsections ( defining the main topic ), which is not a passive activity ( 1 ). Some questions should be asked to practice critical analysis skills, as listed below. Is the research question evident and articulated with previous knowledge? What are the authors’ research goals and theoretical orientations, and how do they interact? Are the authors’ claims related to other scholars’ research? Do the authors consider different perspectives? Was the research project designed and conducted properly? Are the results and discussion plausible, and are they consistent with the research objectives and methodology? What are the strengths and limitations of this work? How do the authors support their findings? How does this work contribute to the current research topic? ( 1 , 19 )
• Taking notes: Students who systematically take notes on each document are more readily able to establish similarities or differences with other documents and to highlight personal observations. This approach reinforces the student’s ideas about the next step and helps develop his/her own academic voice ( 1 , 13 ). Voice recognition software ( 16 ), mind maps ( 5 ), flowcharts, tables, spreadsheets, personal comments on the referenced texts, and note-taking apps are all available tools for managing these observations, and the student him/herself should use the tool that best improves his/her learning. Additionally, when a student is considering submitting an LR to a peer-reviewed journal, notes should be taken on the activities performed in all five steps to ensure that they are able to be replicated.

Fourth step: Writing

The recognition of when a student is able and ready to write after a sufficient period of reading and thinking is likely a difficult task. Some students can produce a review in a single long work session. However, as discussed above, writing is not a linear process, and students do not need to write LRs according to a specific sequence of sections. Writing an LR is a time-consuming task, and some scholars believe that a period of at least six months is sufficient ( 6 ). An LR, and academic writing in general, expresses the writer’s proper thoughts, conclusions about others’ work ( 6 , 10 , 13 , 16 ), and decisions about methods to progress in the chosen field of knowledge. Thus, each student is expected to present a different learning and writing trajectory.

In this step, writing methods should be considered; then, editing, citing and correct referencing should complete this stage, at least temporarily. Freewriting techniques may be a good starting point for brainstorming ideas and improving the understanding of the information that has been read ( 1 ). Students should consider the following parameters when creating an agenda for writing the LR: two-hour writing blocks (at minimum), with prespecified tasks that are possible to complete in one section; short (minutes) and long breaks (days or weeks) to allow sufficient time for mental rest and reflection; and short- and long-term goals to motivate the writing itself ( 20 ). With increasing experience, this scheme can vary widely, and it is not a straightforward rule. Importantly, each discipline has a different way of writing ( 1 ), and each department has its own preferred styles for citations and references.

Fifth step: Reflecting on the writing

In this step, the postgraduate student should ask him/herself the same questions as in the analyzing the results step, which can take more time than anticipated. Ambiguities, repeated ideas, and a lack of coherence may not be noted when the student is immersed in the writing task for long periods. The whole effort will likely be a work in progress, and continuous refinements in the written material will occur once the writing process has begun.

LITERATURE REVIEW CHECKLIST

In contrast to review papers, the LR of a dissertation/thesis should not be a standalone piece or work. Instead, it should present the student as a scholar and should maintain the interest of the audience in how that dissertation/thesis will provide solutions for the current gaps in a particular field.

A checklist for evaluating an LR is convenient for students’ continuous academic development and research transparency: it clearly states the desired achievements for the LR of a dissertation/thesis. Here, we present an LR checklist developed from an LR scoring rubric ( 11 ). For a critical analysis of an LR, we maintain the five categories but offer twelve criteria that are not scaled ( Figure 3 ). The criteria all have the same importance and are not mutually exclusive.

First category: Coverage

1. justified criteria exist for the inclusion and exclusion of literature in the review.

This criterion builds on the main topic and areas covered by the LR ( 18 ). While experts may be confident in retrieving and selecting literature, postgraduate students must convince their audience about the adequacy of their search strategy and their reasons for intentionally selecting what material to cover ( 11 ). References from different fields of knowledge provide distinct perspective, but narrowing the scope of coverage may be important in areas with a large body of existing knowledge.

Second category: Synthesis

2. a critical examination of the state of the field exists.

A critical examination is an assessment of distinct aspects in the field ( 1 ) along with a constructive argument. It is not a negative critique but an expression of the student’s understanding of how other scholars have added to the topic ( 1 ), and the student should analyze and contextualize contradictory statements. A writer’s personal bias (beliefs or political involvement) have been shown to influence the structure and writing of a document; therefore, the cultural and paradigmatic background guide how the theories are revised and presented ( 13 ). However, an honest judgment is important when considering different perspectives.

3. The topic or problem is clearly placed in the context of the broader scholarly literature

The broader scholarly literature should be related to the chosen main topic for the LR ( how to develop the literature review section). The LR can cover the literature from one or more disciplines, depending on its scope, but it should always offer a new perspective. In addition, students should be careful in citing and referencing previous publications. As a rule, original studies and primary references should generally be included. Systematic and narrative reviews present summarized data, and it may be important to cite them, particularly for issues that should be understood but do not require a detailed description. Similarly, quotations highlight the exact statement from another publication. However, excessive referencing may disclose lower levels of analysis and synthesis by the student.

4. The LR is critically placed in the historical context of the field

Situating the LR in its historical context shows the level of comfort of the student in addressing a particular topic. Instead of only presenting statements and theories in a temporal approach, which occasionally follows a linear timeline, the LR should authentically characterize the student’s academic work in the state-of-art techniques in their particular field of knowledge. Thus, the LR should reinforce why the dissertation/thesis represents original work in the chosen research field.

5. Ambiguities in definitions are considered and resolved

Distinct theories on the same topic may exist in different disciplines, and one discipline may consider multiple concepts to explain one topic. These misunderstandings should be addressed and contemplated. The LR should not synthesize all theories or concepts at the same time. Although this approach might demonstrate in-depth reading on a particular topic, it can reveal a student’s inability to comprehend and synthesize his/her research problem.

6. Important variables and phenomena relevant to the topic are articulated

The LR is a unique opportunity to articulate ideas and arguments and to purpose new relationships between them ( 10 , 11 ). More importantly, a sound LR will outline to the audience how these important variables and phenomena will be addressed in the current academic work. Indeed, the LR should build a bidirectional link with the remaining sections and ground the connections between all of the sections ( Figure 1 ).

7. A synthesized new perspective on the literature has been established

The LR is a ‘creative inquiry’ ( 13 ) in which the student elaborates his/her own discourse, builds on previous knowledge in the field, and describes his/her own perspective while interpreting others’ work ( 13 , 17 ). Thus, students should articulate the current knowledge, not accept the results at face value ( 11 , 13 , 17 ), and improve their own cognitive abilities ( 12 ).

Third category: Methodology

8. the main methodologies and research techniques that have been used in the field are identified and their advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

The LR is expected to distinguish the research that has been completed from investigations that remain to be performed, address the benefits and limitations of the main methods applied to date, and consider the strategies for addressing the expected limitations described above. While placing his/her research within the methodological context of a particular topic, the LR will justify the methodology of the study and substantiate the student’s interpretations.

9. Ideas and theories in the field are related to research methodologies

The audience expects the writer to analyze and synthesize methodological approaches in the field. The findings should be explained according to the strengths and limitations of previous research methods, and students must avoid interpretations that are not supported by the analyzed literature. This criterion translates to the student’s comprehension of the applicability and types of answers provided by different research methodologies, even those using a quantitative or qualitative research approach.

Fourth category: Significance

10. the scholarly significance of the research problem is rationalized.

The LR is an introductory section of a dissertation/thesis and will present the postgraduate student as a scholar in a particular field ( 11 ). Therefore, the LR should discuss how the research problem is currently addressed in the discipline being investigated or in different disciplines, depending on the scope of the LR. The LR explains the academic paradigms in the topic of interest ( 13 ) and methods to advance the field from these starting points. However, an excess number of personal citations—whether referencing the student’s research or studies by his/her research team—may reflect a narrow literature search and a lack of comprehensive synthesis of ideas and arguments.

11. The practical significance of the research problem is rationalized

The practical significance indicates a student’s comprehensive understanding of research terminology (e.g., risk versus associated factor), methodology (e.g., efficacy versus effectiveness) and plausible interpretations in the context of the field. Notably, the academic argument about a topic may not always reflect the debate in real life terms. For example, using a quantitative approach in epidemiology, statistically significant differences between groups do not explain all of the factors involved in a particular problem ( 21 ). Therefore, excessive faith in p -values may reflect lower levels of critical evaluation of the context and implications of a research problem by the student.

Fifth category: Rhetoric

12. the lr was written with a coherent, clear structure that supported the review.

This category strictly relates to the language domain: the text should be coherent and presented in a logical sequence, regardless of which organizational ( 18 ) approach is chosen. The beginning of each section/subsection should state what themes will be addressed, paragraphs should be carefully linked to each other ( 10 ), and the first sentence of each paragraph should generally summarize the content. Additionally, the student’s statements are clear, sound, and linked to other scholars’ works, and precise and concise language that follows standardized writing conventions (e.g., in terms of active/passive voice and verb tenses) is used. Attention to grammar, such as orthography and punctuation, indicates prudence and supports a robust dissertation/thesis. Ultimately, all of these strategies provide fluency and consistency for the text.

Although the scoring rubric was initially proposed for postgraduate programs in education research, we are convinced that this checklist is a valuable tool for all academic areas. It enables the monitoring of students’ learning curves and a concentrated effort on any criteria that are not yet achieved. For institutions, the checklist is a guide to support supervisors’ feedback, improve students’ writing skills, and highlight the learning goals of each program. These criteria do not form a linear sequence, but ideally, all twelve achievements should be perceived in the LR.

CONCLUSIONS

A single correct method to classify, evaluate and guide the elaboration of an LR has not been established. In this essay, we have suggested directions for planning, structuring and critically evaluating an LR. The planning of the scope of an LR and approaches to complete it is a valuable effort, and the five steps represent a rational starting point. An institutional environment devoted to active learning will support students in continuously reflecting on LRs, which will form a dialogue between the writer and the current literature in a particular field ( 13 ).

The completion of an LR is a challenging and necessary process for understanding one’s own field of expertise. Knowledge is always transitory, but our responsibility as scholars is to provide a critical contribution to our field, allowing others to think through our work. Good researchers are grounded in sophisticated LRs, which reveal a writer’s training and long-lasting academic skills. We recommend using the LR checklist as a tool for strengthening the skills necessary for critical academic writing.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Leite DFB has initially conceived the idea and has written the first draft of this review. Padilha MAS and Cecatti JG have supervised data interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read the draft and agreed with this submission. Authors are responsible for all aspects of this academic piece.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to all of the professors of the ‘Getting Started with Graduate Research and Generic Skills’ module at University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, for suggesting and supporting this article. Funding: DFBL has granted scholarship from Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES) to take part of her Ph.D. studies in Ireland (process number 88881.134512/2016-01). There is no participation from sponsors on authors’ decision to write or to submit this manuscript.

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

1 The questions posed in systematic reviews usually follow the ‘PICOS’ acronym: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study design.

2 In 1988, Cooper proposed a taxonomy that aims to facilitate students’ and institutions’ understanding of literature reviews. Six characteristics with specific categories are briefly described: Focus: research outcomes, research methodologies, theories, or practices and applications; Goals: integration (generalization, conflict resolution, and linguistic bridge-building), criticism, or identification of central issues; Perspective: neutral representation or espousal of a position; Coverage: exhaustive, exhaustive with selective citations, representative, central or pivotal; Organization: historical, conceptual, or methodological; and Audience: specialized scholars, general scholars, practitioners or policymakers, or the general public.

• UConn Library
• Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
• Introduction

Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction

• Getting Started
• How to Pick a Topic
• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings

What are Literature Reviews?

So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D.  The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.

Goals of Literature Reviews

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?  A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews .  Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.

What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?

• A research paper assigned in a course
• A thesis or dissertation
• A grant proposal
• An article intended for publication in a journal

All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.

Types of Literature Reviews

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.

• Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework:  10.1177/08948453211037398  

Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.

• Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review:  10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w

Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.

• Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis:  10.1215/00703370-9164737

Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts .  Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.

• Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis:  10.1177/05390184221113735

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

• UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
• Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview

University Libraries

Literature review.

• What is a Literature Review?
• What is Its Purpose?
• 1. Select a Topic
• 2. Set the Topic in Context
• 3. Types of Information Sources
• 4. Use Information Sources
• 5. Get the Information
• 6. Organize / Manage the Information
• 7. Position the Literature Review
• 8. Write the Literature Review

A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, and other sources relevant to a particular area of research.  The review should enumerate, describe, summarize, objectively evaluate and clarify this previous research.  It should give a theoretical base for the research and help you (the author) determine the nature of your research.  The literature review acknowledges the work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well conceived.  It is assumed that by mentioning a previous work in the field of study, that the author has read, evaluated, and assimiliated that work into the work at hand.

A literature review creates a "landscape" for the reader, giving her or him a full understanding of the developments in the field.  This landscape informs the reader that the author has indeed assimilated all (or the vast majority of) previous, significant works in the field into her or his research. 

 "In writing the literature review, the purpose is to convey to the reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. The literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (eg. your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries.( http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/literature-review )

Recommended Reading

• Next: What is Its Purpose? >>
• Last Updated: Oct 2, 2023 12:34 PM

• Maps & Floorplans
• Libraries A-Z

• Ellis Library (main)
• Engineering Library
• Geological Sciences
• Journalism Library
• Law Library
• Mathematical Sciences
• MU Digital Collections
• Veterinary Medical
• More Libraries...
• Instructional Services
• Course Reserves
• Course Guides
• Schedule a Library Class
• Class Assessment Forms
• Recordings & Tutorials
• Research & Writing Help
• More class resources
• Places to Study
• Borrow, Request & Renew
• Call Numbers
• Computers, Printers, Scanners & Software
• Digital Media Lab
• Equipment Lending: Laptops, cameras, etc.
• Subject Librarians
• Writing Tutors
• More In the Library...
• Undergraduate Students
• Graduate Students
• Faculty & Staff
• Researcher Support
• Distance Learners
• International Students
• More Services for...
• View my MU Libraries Account (login & click on My Library Account)
• View my MOBIUS Checkouts
• Renew my Books (login & click on My Loans)
• Place a Hold on a Book
• Request Books from Depository
• View my ILL@MU Account
• Set Up Alerts in Databases
• More Account Information...

Introduction to Literature Reviews

Introduction.

• Step One: Define
• Step Two: Research
• Step Three: Write
• Suggested Readings

A literature review is a written work that :

• Compiles significant research published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers;
• Surveys scholarly articles, books, dissertations, conference proceedings, and other sources;
• Examines contrasting perspectives, theoretical approaches, methodologies, findings, results, conclusions.
• Reviews critically, analyzes, and synthesizes existing research on a topic; and,
• Performs a thorough “re” view, “overview”, or “look again” of past and current works on a subject, issue, or theory.

From these analyses, the writer then offers an overview of the current status of a particular area of knowledge from both a practical and theoretical perspective.

Literature reviews are important because they are usually a  required  step in a thesis proposal (Master's or PhD). The proposal will not be well-supported without a literature review. Also, literature reviews are important because they help you learn important authors and ideas in your field. This is useful for your coursework and your writing. Knowing key authors also helps you become acquainted with other researchers in your field.

Look at this diagram and imagine that your research is the "something new." This shows how your research should relate to major works and other sources.

Olivia Whitfield | Graduate Reference Assistant | 2012-2015

• Next: Step One: Define >>
• Last Updated: Aug 29, 2024 1:55 PM
• URL: https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/literaturereview

Literature Review - what is a Literature Review, why it is important and how it is done

What are literature reviews, goals of literature reviews, types of literature reviews, about this guide/licence.

• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Literature Reviews and Sources
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings
• Useful Resources

Help is Just a Click Away

Search our FAQ Knowledge base, ask a question, chat, send comments...

Go to LibAnswers

 What is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries. " - Quote from Taylor, D. (n.d) "The literature review: A few tips on conducting it"

Source NC State University Libraries. This video is published under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-NC-SA US license.

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

- Baumeister, R.F. & Leary, M.R. (1997). "Writing narrative literature reviews," Review of General Psychology , 1(3), 311-320.

When do you need to write a Literature Review?

• When writing a prospectus or a thesis/dissertation
• When writing a research paper
• When writing a grant proposal

In all these cases you need to dedicate a chapter in these works to showcase what have been written about your research topic and to point out how your own research will shed a new light into these body of scholarship.

Literature reviews are also written as standalone articles as a way to survey a particular research topic in-depth. This type of literature reviews look at a topic from a historical perspective to see how the understanding of the topic have change through time.

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

• Narrative Review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.
• Book review essays/ Historiographical review essays : This is a type of review that focus on a small set of research books on a particular topic " to locate these books within current scholarship, critical methodologies, and approaches" in the field. - LARR
• Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L.K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
• Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M.C. & Ilardi, S.S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
• Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). "Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts," Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53(3), 311-318.

Guide adapted from "Literature Review" , a guide developed by Marisol Ramos used under CC BY 4.0 /modified from original.

• Next: Strategies to Find Sources >>
• Last Updated: Jul 3, 2024 10:56 AM
• URL: https://lit.libguides.com/Literature-Review

The Library, Technological University of the Shannon: Midwest

Literature Reviews

What is a Literature Review?

• Steps for Creating a Literature Review
• Providing Evidence / Critical Analysis
• Challenges when writing a Literature Review
• Systematic Literature Reviews

A literature review is an academic text that surveys, synthesizes, and critically evaluates the existing literature on a specific topic. It is typically required for theses, dissertations, or long reports and  serves several key purposes:

• Surveying the Literature : It involves a comprehensive search and examination of relevant academic books, journal articles, and other sources related to the chosen topic.
• Synthesizing Information : The literature review summarizes and organizes the information found in the literature, often identifying patterns, themes, and gaps in the current knowledge.
• Critical Analysis : It critically analyzes the collected information, highlighting limitations, gaps, and areas of controversy, and suggests directions for future research.
• Establishing Context : It places the current research within the broader context of the field, demonstrating how the new research builds on or diverges from previous studies.

Types of Literature Reviews

Literature reviews can take various forms, including:

• Narrative Reviews : These provide a qualitative summary of the literature and are often used to give a broad overview of a topic. They may be less structured and more subjective, focusing on synthesizing the literature to support a particular viewpoint.
• Systematic Reviews : These are more rigorous and structured, following a specific methodology to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a particular question. They aim to minimize bias and provide a comprehensive summary of the existing evidence.
• Integrative Reviews : Similar to systematic reviews, but they aim to generate new knowledge by integrating findings from different studies to develop new theories or frameworks.

Importance of Literature Reviews

• Foundation for Research : They provide a solid background for new research projects, helping to justify the research question and methodology.

Identifying Gaps : Literature reviews highlight areas where knowledge is lacking, guiding future research efforts.

• Building Credibility : Demonstrating familiarity with existing research enhances the credibility of the researcher and their work.

In summary, a literature review is a critical component of academic research that helps to frame the current state of knowledge, identify gaps, and provide  a basis for new research.

The research, the body of current literature, and the particular objectives should all influence the structure of a literature review. It is also critical to remember that creating a literature review is an ongoing process - as one reads and analyzes the literature, one's understanding may change, which could require rearranging the literature review.

Paré, G. and Kitsiou, S. (2017) 'Methods for Literature Reviews' , in: Lau, F. and Kuziemsky, C. (eds.)  Handbook of eHealth evaluation: an evidence-based approach . Victoria (BC): University of Victoria.

Perplexity AI (2024) Perplexity AI response to Kathy Neville, 31 July.       

Royal Literary Fund (2024)  The structure of a literature review.  Available at: https://www.rlf.org.uk/resources/the-structure-of-a-literature-review/ (Accessed: 23 July 2024).

Library Services for Undergraduate Research (2024) Literature review: a definition . Available at: https://libguides.wustl.edu/our?p=302677 (Accessed: 31 July 2024).

Further Reading:

Methods for Literature Reviews

Literature Review (The University of Edinburgh)

Literature Reviews (University of Sheffield)

• How to Write a Literature Review Paper? Wee, Bert Van ; Banister, David ISBN: 0144-1647

• Next: Steps for Creating a Literature Review >>
• Last Updated: Sep 4, 2024 11:43 AM
• URL: https://library.lsbu.ac.uk/literaturereviews

Research Methods

• Getting Started
• Literature Review Research
• Research Design
• Research Design By Discipline
• SAGE Research Methods
• Teaching with SAGE Research Methods

Literature Review

• What is a Literature Review?
• What is NOT a Literature Review?
• Purposes of a Literature Review
• Types of Literature Reviews
• Literature Reviews vs. Systematic Reviews
• Systematic vs. Meta-Analysis

Literature Review  is a comprehensive survey of the works published in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in the form of an in-depth, critical bibliographic essay or annotated list in which attention is drawn to the most significant works.

Also, we can define a literature review as the collected body of scholarly works related to a topic:

• Summarizes and analyzes previous research relevant to a topic
• Includes scholarly books and articles published in academic journals
• Can be an specific scholarly paper or a section in a research paper

The objective of a Literature Review is to find previous published scholarly works relevant to an specific topic

• Help gather ideas or information
• Keep up to date in current trends and findings
• Help develop new questions

A literature review is important because it:

• Explains the background of research on a topic.
• Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
• Helps focus your own research questions or problems
• Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
• Suggests unexplored ideas or populations
• Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
• Tests assumptions; may help counter preconceived ideas and remove unconscious bias.
• Identifies critical gaps, points of disagreement, or potentially flawed methodology or theoretical approaches.
• Indicates potential directions for future research.

All content in this section is from Literature Review Research from Old Dominion University 

Keep in mind the following, a literature review is NOT:

Not an essay 

Not an annotated bibliography  in which you summarize each article that you have reviewed.  A literature review goes beyond basic summarizing to focus on the critical analysis of the reviewed works and their relationship to your research question.

Not a research paper   where you select resources to support one side of an issue versus another.  A lit review should explain and consider all sides of an argument in order to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted.

A literature review serves several purposes. For example, it

• provides thorough knowledge of previous studies; introduces seminal works.
• helps focus one’s own research topic.
• identifies a conceptual framework for one’s own research questions or problems; indicates potential directions for future research.
• suggests previously unused or underused methodologies, designs, quantitative and qualitative strategies.
• identifies gaps in previous studies; identifies flawed methodologies and/or theoretical approaches; avoids replication of mistakes.
• helps the researcher avoid repetition of earlier research.
• suggests unexplored populations.
• determines whether past studies agree or disagree; identifies controversy in the literature.
• tests assumptions; may help counter preconceived ideas and remove unconscious bias.

As Kennedy (2007) notes*, it is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the original studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally that become part of the lore of field. In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews.

Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are several approaches to how they can be done, depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study. Listed below are definitions of types of literature reviews:

Argumentative Review      This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews.

Integrative Review      Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication.

Historical Review      Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical reviews are focused on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.

Methodological Review      A review does not always focus on what someone said [content], but how they said it [method of analysis]. This approach provides a framework of understanding at different levels (i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches and data collection and analysis techniques), enables researchers to draw on a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection and data analysis, and helps highlight many ethical issues which we should be aware of and consider as we go through our study.

Systematic Review      This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?"

Theoretical Review      The purpose of this form is to concretely examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review help establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.

* Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature."  Educational Researcher  36 (April 2007): 139-147.

All content in this section is from The Literature Review created by Dr. Robert Larabee USC

Robinson, P. and Lowe, J. (2015),  Literature reviews vs systematic reviews.  Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39: 103-103. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12393

What's in the name? The difference between a Systematic Review and a Literature Review, and why it matters . By Lynn Kysh from University of Southern California

Systematic review or meta-analysis?

A  systematic review  answers a defined research question by collecting and summarizing all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria.

A  meta-analysis  is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of these studies.

Systematic reviews, just like other research articles, can be of varying quality. They are a significant piece of work (the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination at York estimates that a team will take 9-24 months), and to be useful to other researchers and practitioners they should have:

• clearly stated objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies
• explicit, reproducible methodology
• a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies
• assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies (e.g. risk of bias)
• systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics and findings of the included studies

Not all systematic reviews contain meta-analysis. 

Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of independent studies. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effects of health care than those derived from the individual studies included within a review.  More information on meta-analyses can be found in  Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 9 .

A meta-analysis goes beyond critique and integration and conducts secondary statistical analysis on the outcomes of similar studies.  It is a systematic review that uses quantitative methods to synthesize and summarize the results.

An advantage of a meta-analysis is the ability to be completely objective in evaluating research findings.  Not all topics, however, have sufficient research evidence to allow a meta-analysis to be conducted.  In that case, an integrative review is an appropriate strategy. 

Some of the content in this section is from Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: step by step guide created by Kate McAllister.

• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: Research Design >>
• Last Updated: Jul 15, 2024 10:34 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.udel.edu/researchmethods

Literature Reviews and Annotated Bibliographies

Initial databases for a literature review.

What is a Literature Review?

• How to Write a Literature Review?
• Graduate Research and the Literature Review
• What is an Annotated Bibliography?
• How to Evaluate Sources?
• Citation & Avoiding Plagiarism

The databases listed here are interdisciplinary and suitable for most disciplines. For databases specific to your discipline see our Research Guides  

Academic Search Ultimate  Includes some full text

A great place to start to search for magazine and journal articles on almost all topics. Tip : Check "peer reviewed" box to limit your search to scholarly journals.

Dissertations and Theses   (1861+) Indexes dissertations accepted for doctoral degrees by accredited North American educational institutions and over 200 other institutions. Also covers masters theses since 1962. Starting in the early to mid-1900's, the full text is included for an increasingly comprehensive number of dissertations and theses. 

Google Scholar   Enables you to search specifically for scholarly literature, including peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, preprints, abstracts and technical reports from all broad areas of research. Use Google Scholar to find articles from a widevariety of academic publishers, professional societies, preprint repositories and universities, as well as scholarly articles available across the web

Humanities and Social Science Retrospective   Bibliographic database that provides citations to articles in a wide range of English language journals in the humanities and social sciences for the period 1907-1984.

  JSTOR Includes full text Includes long runs of backfiles of scholarly journals. Subjects covered include Anthropology, Asian Studies, Ecology, Economics, Education, Finance, History, Mathematics, Philosophy, Political Science, Population Studies, and Sociology.

Periodical Archives Online- (1770-1995) Includes full text; Full text archive of hundreds of periodicals in the humanities and social sciences from their first issues to 1995 Allows date-limited searching. Periodical Index Online, 1665 - 1995

"A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate assignment, ..., but more often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries."

--Written by Dena Taylor, Health Sciences Writing Centre and available at http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/literature-review (Accessed August 8th, 2011)

Writing the Literature Review sites :

  Literature Reviews: UNC - Chapel Hill

Write a Literature Review: UC-Santa Cruz  

Writing a Literature Review: Perdue OWL

Methods Map: Literature Review

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?

• To develop a new theory
• To evaluate a theory or theories
• To survey what’s known about a topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 
• Provide a historical overview of the development of a topic

Type of Literature Reviews:

• Mature and/or established topic: Topic is well-known and the purpose of this type of review is to analyze and synthesize this accumulated body of research.
• Emerging Topic: The purpose of this type of review to identify understudy or new emerging research area.
• << Previous: Home
• Next: How to Write a Literature Review? >>
• Last updated: Jan 8, 2024 2:52 PM
• URL: https://libguides.asu.edu/LiteratureReviews

The ASU Library acknowledges the twenty-three Native Nations that have inhabited this land for centuries. Arizona State University's four campuses are located in the Salt River Valley on ancestral territories of Indigenous peoples, including the Akimel O’odham (Pima) and Pee Posh (Maricopa) Indian Communities, whose care and keeping of these lands allows us to be here today. ASU Library acknowledges the sovereignty of these nations and seeks to foster an environment of success and possibility for Native American students and patrons. We are advocates for the incorporation of Indigenous knowledge systems and research methodologies within contemporary library practice. ASU Library welcomes members of the Akimel O’odham and Pee Posh, and all Native nations to the Library.

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 5. The Literature Review
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

A literature review surveys prior research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the topic.

Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014.

Importance of a Good Literature Review

A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories . A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical features of a literature review might:

• Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations,
• Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates,
• Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
• Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched to date.

Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to:

• Place each work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied.
• Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
• Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.
• Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies.
• Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort.
• Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research.
• Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important].

Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2011; Knopf, Jeffrey W. "Doing a Literature Review." PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January 2006): 127-132; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012.

Types of Literature Reviews

It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part of the body of epistemological traditions within the field.

In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews. Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study.

Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews [see below].

Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. This is the most common form of review in the social sciences.

Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.

Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis]. Reviewing methods of analysis provides a framework of understanding at different levels [i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study.

Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a clearly defined research problem . Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?" This type of literature review is primarily applied to examining prior research studies in clinical medicine and allied health fields, but it is increasingly being used in the social sciences.

Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.

NOTE: Most often the literature review will incorporate some combination of types. For example, a review that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or philosophical problem related to the research problem will also need to include writing supported by sources that establish the history of these arguments in the literature.

Baumeister, Roy F. and Mark R. Leary. "Writing Narrative Literature Reviews."  Review of General Psychology 1 (September 1997): 311-320; Mark R. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature." Educational Researcher 36 (April 2007): 139-147; Petticrew, Mark and Helen Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide . Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2006; Torracro, Richard. "Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples." Human Resource Development Review 4 (September 2005): 356-367; Rocco, Tonette S. and Maria S. Plakhotnik. "Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions." Human Ressource Development Review 8 (March 2008): 120-130; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Thinking About Your Literature Review

The structure of a literature review should include the following in support of understanding the research problem :

• An overview of the subject, issue, or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review,
• Division of works under review into themes or categories [e.g. works that support a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative approaches entirely],
• An explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others,
• Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research.

The critical evaluation of each work should consider :

• Provenance -- what are the author's credentials? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence [e.g. primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings]?
• Methodology -- were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem? Was the sample size appropriate? Were the results effectively interpreted and reported?
• Objectivity -- is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point?
• Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most convincing or least convincing?
• Validity -- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?

II.  Development of the Literature Review

Four Basic Stages of Writing 1.  Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2.  Literature search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3.  Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4.  Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature.

Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1.  Roughly how many sources would be appropriate to include? 2.  What types of sources should I review (books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3.  Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme or issue? 4.  Should I evaluate the sources in any way beyond evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5.  Should I provide subheadings and other background information, such as definitions and/or a history? Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review sections. Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. The bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the course syllabus, are also excellent entry points into your own research. Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources. Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the research problem. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. For example, a book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role Egypt has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in the text. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made. However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to explore what is considered by scholars to be a "hot topic" and what is not.

III.  Ways to Organize Your Literature Review

Chronology of Events If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published. This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. By Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on environmental studies of brown fields if the progression revealed, for example, a change in the soil collection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies. Thematic [“conceptual categories”] A thematic literature review is the most common approach to summarizing prior research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thematic reviews are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time, although the progression of time may still be incorporated into a thematic review. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on the development of online political satire. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. The difference in this example between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: themes related to the role of the Internet in presidential politics. Note that more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point being made. Methodological A methodological approach focuses on the methods utilized by the researcher. For the Internet in American presidential politics project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of American presidents on American, British, and French websites. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the Internet on a particular political party. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed.

Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. However, only include what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger scholarship about the research problem.

Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write:

• Current Situation : Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review.
• Sources Used : Describes the methods and resources [e.g., databases] you used to identify the literature you reviewed.
• History : The chronological progression of the field, the research literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
• Selection Methods : Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed [i.e., scholarly] sources.
• Standards : Description of the way in which you present your information.
• Questions for Further Research : What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

IV.  Writing Your Literature Review

Once you've settled on how to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. When writing your review, keep in mind these issues.

Use Evidence A literature review section is, in this sense, just like any other academic research paper. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence [citations] that demonstrates that what you are saying is valid. Be Selective Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. The type of information you choose to mention should relate directly to the research problem, whether it is thematic, methodological, or chronological. Related items that provide additional information, but that are not key to understanding the research problem, can be included in a list of further readings . Use Quotes Sparingly Some short quotes are appropriate if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased. Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. Do not use extensive quotes as a substitute for using your own words in reviewing the literature. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's significance and relating it to your own work and the work of others. Keep Your Own Voice While the literature review presents others' ideas, your voice [the writer's] should remain front and center. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. Use Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work.

V.  Common Mistakes to Avoid

These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature.

• Sources in your literature review do not clearly relate to the research problem;
• You do not take sufficient time to define and identify the most relevant sources to use in the literature review related to the research problem;
• Relies exclusively on secondary analytical sources rather than including relevant primary research studies or data;
• Uncritically accepts another researcher's findings and interpretations as valid, rather than examining critically all aspects of the research design and analysis;
• Does not describe the search procedures that were used in identifying the literature to review;
• Reports isolated statistical results rather than synthesizing them in chi-squared or meta-analytic methods; and,
• Only includes research that validates assumptions and does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretations found in the literature.

Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . London: SAGE, 2011; Literature Review Handout. Online Writing Center. Liberty University; Literature Reviews. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2016; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012; Randolph, Justus J. “A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review." Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. vol. 14, June 2009; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016; Taylor, Dena. The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. Academic Skills Centre. University of Canberra.

Writing Tip

Break Out of Your Disciplinary Box!

Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East? In what ways might geographers view the need for better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the issue? You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective. Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research literature.

Frodeman, Robert. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity . New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Another Writing Tip

Don't Just Review for Content!

While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Some questions to ask:

• How are they organizing their ideas?
• What methods have they used to study the problem?
• What theories have been used to explain, predict, or understand their research problem?
• What sources have they cited to support their conclusions?
• How have they used non-textual elements [e.g., charts, graphs, figures, etc.] to illustrate key points?

When you begin to write your literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and constructed because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the research problem.

Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1 998.

Yet Another Writing Tip

When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking and Move On?

Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature:

• Look for repeating patterns in the research findings . If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research?  Does it forge a new path? Or, does is merely add more of the same thing being said?
• Look at sources the authors cite to in their work . If you begin to see the same researchers cited again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been generated to address the research problem.
• Search Google Scholar to identify who has subsequently cited leading scholars already identified in your literature review [see next sub-tab]. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. Here again, if the same authors are being cited again and again, this may indicate no new literature has been written on the topic.

Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2016; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.

• << Previous: Theoretical Framework
• Next: Citation Tracking >>
• Last Updated: Sep 4, 2024 9:40 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

• Student Services
• Faculty Services

Literature Reviews - An Introduction: Definition

• How do I recognize a Literature Review?
• How do I find a Literature Review?
• How do I write a Literature Review?

For Library Updates

Literature Review: Definition and Example

A Literature Review is "a systematic, explicit, and reproducible method for identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the existing body of completed and recorded work produced by researchers, scholars, and practitioners."

 - From Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From Internet to Paper , by Arlene Fink, 2nd ed. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, 2005.

Subject Guide

• Next: How do I recognize a Literature Review? >>
• Last Updated: Aug 21, 2024 10:06 AM
• URL: https://suffolk.libguides.com/LitReview

Literature Reviews

• What Is It?
• Finding Literature Reviews

A literature review is both a process and a product. As a process, it involves searching for information related to your topic, to familiarize yourself with the relevant research and to identify issues and gaps in the research. In most cases you're seeking to identify the key authors and key arguments that are relevant to your topic, not to exhaustively read everything written on the subject. 

Types of Literature Reviews

A stand alone literature review can be a single work in its own right.  Examples include:

• A class assignment
• A review article

Literature reviews can also be component parts of larger bodies of work. Examples include:

• A thesis / dissertation
• An academic journal article introduction

Student Success Librarian

What is a Literature Review?

A literature review is the writing process of summarizing, synthesizing and/or critiquing the literature found as a result of a literature search. It may be used as background or context for a primary research project.

There are several reasons to review the literature :

• Identify the developments in the field of study
• Learn about the information sources and the research methodologies
• Find gaps in the literature that can become research questions
• Validate the originality of a research project
• Evaluate the methods
• Identify errors to avoid
• Highlight the strengths, weaknesses and controversies in the field of study
• Identify the subject experts

When writing your review, there are objectives you should keep in mind :

• Inform the audience of the developments in the field
• Establish your credibility
• Discuss the relevance and significance of your question(s)
• Provide the context for your methodological approach
• Discuss the relevance and appropriateness of your approach.

​The level of detail or comprehensiveness of your literature review may depend on many things, but especially the purpose and audience of your review. For example, if you're writing a literature review that will aid you in writing a thesis or dissertation, you may want to have a very comprehensive lit review that reviews all relevant literature on a topic, as well as relevant sources beyond what is immediately and freely available (e.g. foundational scholarly articles not available through library collections).

Purpose of a Literature Review

Watch this YouTube video to understand the purpose of a literature review.

• Next: Finding Literature Reviews >>
• Last Updated: Jul 25, 2024 9:18 AM
• URL: https://library.knox.edu/literature-review

• Open access
• Published: 02 September 2024

Ecological care in nursing practice: a Walker and Avant concept analysis

• Golshan Moghbeli 1 ,
• Amin Soheili 2 ,
• Mansour Ghafourifard 1 , 3 ,
• Shahla Shahbazi 1 &
• Hanieh Aziz Karkan 1  

BMC Nursing volume  23 , Article number:  614 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Today, the human population faces an increasing array of emerging environmental challenges. Despite its importance, nurses often neglect ecological issues, which can compromise patient health. While the ecological nursing perspective has the potential to lead to innovative care approaches that benefit patients, the nursing profession, and the environment, the concept of ecological care lacks a clear definition and its dimensions remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze and clarify the concept of ‘ecological care’ in the nursing discipline.

Walker and Avant’s analysis method was used to identify descriptions, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of the concept of ‘ecological care’ in nursing. We searched the databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, SID, and IranDoc) using the keywords “ecological,” “nurse,” and “nursing” using Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” in the title and abstract fields both in English and Persian to identify relevant literature on ecological care in nursing.

Ecological care, as a multidimensional concept, encompasses ecological thinking, ecological attitude, ecological awareness, ecological sensitivity, and ecological literacy. This entails the optimal utilization of environmental factors to provide patients with high-quality care and preserve ecological sustainability through environmentally friendly behaviors.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the need to elucidate, endorse, and solidify ecological thinking in all aspects of nursing care including nursing management, education, and research, which can lead to improved care quality, patient safety, and sustainability. Within this framework, nursing educators could play an essential role in integrating ecological care into nursing education. The study emphasizes the need to integrate ecological thinking into all aspects of nursing.

Peer Review reports

Ecology, the study of interactions between living organisms and their environments, encompasses physical and social surroundings that impact all living beings. From a human science perspective, ecology emphasizes these interconnected relationships, fostering a deeper understanding of nursing and caring practices [ 1 ]. Currently, environmental concerns are considered significant threats to public health. However, healthcare professionals often lack sufficient awareness of the importance of ecological issues [ 2 ].

As the largest group of healthcare professionals, nurses play a crucial role in decisions regarding product use, energy consumption, and chemical selection in healthcare settings. However, they face a significant challenge: balancing environmental concerns and ecological principles with their professional duties [ 3 ]. Although nurses can advocate reducing exposure to harmful chemicals and adopting less toxic products, their work environments often require high energy consumption and generate substantial medical waste [ 4 ]. This medical waste encompasses both hazardous (infectious, pathological, chemical, pharmaceutical, cytotoxic, and radioactive) and non-hazardous or general waste, posing potential risks to patients, communities, and broader ecological health [ 5 ]. Multiple studies have highlighted the critical role of ecological considerations within healthcare in the overall health of ecosystems [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Consequently, ecological issues have become a high priority for nurses, demanding attention and action [ 10 ].

The importance of environment, ecosystems, and ecology in nursing practice has been recognized by pioneers like Florence Nightingale as the founder of modern nursing (published in 1992, originally written in 1959) [ 11 ] and subsequently by Fawcett (1984) [ 12 ]. This vision is further reflected in the International Council of Nurses (ICN) Code of Ethics, which states that “nurses contribute to the population’s health and work to achieve the sustainable development goals.” By adopting sustainable practices, nurses can significantly reduce their environmental footprint and contribute to achieving the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [ 9 ]. Recognizing this crucial role, nursing organizations such as the American Nurses Association actively promote nurses’ participation in environmental protection initiatives [ 13 ].

The concept of ecological care in nursing, as a multidimensional concept, encompasses several aspects. Lausten (2006) proposed a nursing ecological theory to broaden nurses’ perspectives by incorporating concepts of global ecosystems, communities, and interrelationships from the ecological sciences. This theory recognizes that human interactions with the environment extend beyond the personal sphere and encompass professional activities. Consequently, nurses can integrate ecological principles into their practice, fostering new directions in care that benefit patients, healthcare professionals, and the environment [ 14 ]. Dahlberg et al. (2016) conducted an empirical study to explore how a phenomenological life-world theory could expand the concept of holistic care into “ecological care.” They argued that the traditional approach to holistic care has neglected environmental and ecological dimensions. Their findings suggested that ecological care goes beyond fighting illnesses. It emphasizes understanding patients within the context of their world, a world that they both influence and are influenced by. This approach helps patients reintegrate into their rhythm of existence [ 1 ].

Al-Shamaly (2021) highlights “ecological awareness,” which emphasizes creating a safe and comfortable patient environment through noise, light, color, and temperature control [ 15 ]. Sattler (2013) adds another dimension, suggesting that nurses can act as catalysts for transforming hospitals into environmentally sustainable spaces. This can be achieved through practices such as adopting environmentally friendly purchasing policies (e.g., waste management strategies, reduced chemical use, and proper disposal of hazardous materials such as batteries), promoting healthy food options, and favoring mercury-free products [ 16 ].

Although ecological factors could influence the quality of care, patient safety, individual and community health, resource preservation, and sustainable practices [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], nurses’ awareness of ecological care and its dimensions remains limited [ 2 ]. Moreover, there is no universally accepted definition of ecological care as a complex concept [ 20 ]. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze and clarify the concept of ‘ecological care’ within the nursing discipline.

Walker and Avant’s concept analysis method was used as a rigorous and systematic approach to identify descriptions, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of the concept of ‘ecological care’ in nursing. Ecological care is a widely applicable concept that extends beyond the confines of nursing care. Therefore, the literature review encompasses all the various applications of ecological care, including both implicit and explicit aspects. The stages of the concept analysis method are as follows: (A) selecting a concept, (B) determining the aims or purposes of the analysis, (C) identifying all uses of the concept that you can discover, (D) determining the defining attributes, (E) identifying a model case, (F) identifying borderline, related, contrary, invented, and illegitimate cases, (G) identifying antecedents and consequences, and (H) defining empirical referents [ 21 ].

Literature search

A systematic literature review was conducted using multiple health databases, including PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, SID, and IranDoc. The concepts “ecological,” “nurse” and “nursing” were searched using Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” in the title and abstract fields of each database. No temporal limits were applied and articles published in either English or Persian until July 2023 were retrieved.

Initially, 1083 records were identified by searching the titles and abstracts of these databases. Subsequently, 16 additional records were manually included, resulting in a total of 1099 records. Duplicate records were removed, leading to an initial selection of 1068 records. The titles and abstracts of these records were screened, and the eligibility criteria were applied to the full text of the selected records. Eventually, 36 records met the criteria and underwent a comprehensive review of concept analysis (Fig.  1 ). A detailed overview of the included studies, including publication year, title, country, and key findings, can be found in Appendix A.

Flow diagram of the study (data search and selection process)

Concept selection

The importance of a specific concept is influenced by a variety of factors both within and outside its field over time. Consequently, concepts lacking clear definitions warrant further analysis [ 21 ]. Considering the interconnectedness of ecosystems and human health, as well as the imperative to maintain environmental sustainability, particularly within healthcare, the concept of ecology has gained prominence in nursing and other health professions. Nightingale’s emphasis on the environment underscores this importance. Given the increasing significance of ecological care in healthcare and the lack of a clear, unified definition, this concept was selected for analysis to elucidate its dimensions and characteristics.

Determining the aims of the analysis

The concept of “ecological care” has been insufficiently analyzed within the healthcare context, resulting in a lack of a clear definition. This study aims to refine the meaning of ecological care in nursing by identifying its descriptions, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents.

Identifying the use of the concept

To explore the concept of ecological care, it is crucial to understand the distinct meanings of each word from a variety of sources such as dictionaries, thesauruses, websites, and scholarly literature.

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the term ‘ecological’ is an adjective related to the science of ecology. This refers to the environment of living things or the relationships between living things and their environments [ 22 ].

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the term ‘care’ functions both as a noun, representing responsibility for or attention to health, well-being, safety, or solicitude, and as a verb, meaning to feel interest or concern and to provide care [ 23 ].

Ecological care in nursing literature

The concept of ecological care, originating from the theory of biological ecology, aims to offer solutions that effectively minimize the adverse impacts of nursing care on the ecosystem [ 14 ]. Ecological care can be classified into two types: individuals and professionals. The individual approach focuses on raising public awareness, shaping attitudes and behaviors, and promoting responsible actions regarding energy consumption, the production of toxic substances (such as greenhouse gases), chemical usage, and healthy and organic diet adoption. Conversely, the professional approach emphasizes the importance of sensitivity, awareness, attitude, behavior, and responsible actions among individuals when carrying out their professional responsibilities [ 9 , 24 ].

Clinical environments require ecological care, which can be achieved through two distinct approaches: environmental and organizational care. Environmental care involves maintaining equipment and machines, ensuring workplace safety, minimizing risks, managing noise levels, optimizing lighting conditions, regulating temperature, and employing creative designs to create a comfortable and relaxing environment. It also involves facilitating visits from family members and pets and improving patients’ sleep quality. Additionally, the use of digital technology helps ensure a healthy and safe treatment environment for patients in the Intensive Care Units (ICU). On the other hand, organizational care focuses on time and resource management. This includes strategies such as reducing paper and ink consumption by utilizing electronic records, which aids in efficient time management. Organizational care aims to streamline nurses’ tasks and improve overall work efficiency by minimizing their workload and improving access to patient information. Finally, waste management practices play a crucial role in maintaining an environmentally conscious approach in healthcare settings [ 15 ].

Determining the defining attributes

Ecological thinking.

According to Balgopal and Wallace (2009), ecological thinking is a combination of ecological understanding and ecological awareness [ 25 ]. Understanding ecology involves understanding concepts such as biotic, abiotic, and biological interactions. This serves as the initial stage of ecological thinking, which is further developed by comprehending the impact of human activities on the ecosystem [ 26 ]. Ecological understanding can be conceptualized as a continuum, with one end representing the capacity to identify problems and propose ecological decisions, considering their potential consequences. On the other end of the continuum is a lack of understanding, where the ability to explain the impact of human actions on the ecosystem is insufficient [ 25 ].

Ecological thinking causes a transformation in people’s presuppositions and attitudes towards the surrounding world, enabling them to recognize that we are interconnected and evolving alongside nature. Embracing an ecological perspective requires acknowledging ourselves as integral components of nature rather than being superior to it. This encompassing concept embodies various underlying principles such as ecology, wholeness, interdependence, diversity, partnership, energy flows, flexibility, cycles, and sustainability [ 17 , 27 ]. Hes and de Plessis (2014) refer to this set of principles as the ‘ecological worldview.’ Shifting towards an ecological perspective entail altering our perspective on the world and ourselves. The fundamental essence of this transformation involves moving away from egocentric and anthropocentric thinking, which emphasizes separateness, and instead adopting a holistic perception that aims to counterbalance environmental damage. Enhancing ecological thinking can be achieved through the instruction of ecological concepts and behaviors [ 28 ].

Ecological attitude

Ecological attitude is a complex construct that encompasses various key components such as emotions, perceptions, personal norms, values, and relationships with the environment. The emotional dimension of ecological attitude plays a pivotal role in preparing individuals to address environmental issues and cultivate ecological behaviors in all aspects of life [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], as it determines the extent to which individuals will act in environmentally responsible ways [ 32 ].

Predicting a specific behavior entails possessing a specific attitude towards that behavior, as attitudes alone do not guarantee behavior, but predict or influence it [ 2 , 33 ]. Ecological behavior can be defined as the actions taken by a nurse to protect the environment, and it varies depending on the individual’s context and circumstances. Achieving the goal of ecological behavior can be challenging in certain situations, but it is crucial to promote sustainable living and preserve the planet’s natural resources [ 31 ].

Ecological awareness

Ecological awareness refers to knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to the environment. Its focus is on increasing responsibility toward achieving ecological sustainability [ 34 ]. One of its important characteristics is the perception of natural objects from a subject’s perspective [ 35 ]. As a theoretical and practical science, ecological awareness includes two stages: awareness of environmental changes, and feelings of concern about environmental problems and trying to solve them. People with ecological awareness try to be actively responsible for their interactions with the environment and exhibit positive behaviors towards the surrounding environment [ 9 , 20 ].

Ecological awareness is also a level of cognitive thinking that enables nurses to focus on protecting the environment while providing nursing care. This concept requires nurses to pay attention to the potential of nature and the surrounding environment that promotes, maintains, and restores human health [ 9 , 14 ]. This raises important questions about whether nurses are aware of the positive effects of recycling medical equipment and materials, or the harmful effects of greenhouse gases (CO2, NO, etc.) caused by fossil fuels and smoke from medical waste incinerators. It also highlights how much nurses are aware of the impact of their care activities on ecosystem damage and public health [ 9 , 19 , 36 ]. The role of nurses with ecological awareness is crucial in raising awareness among colleagues, managers, patients, and students [ 8 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].

Ecological sensitivity

Ecological sensitivity refers to the inclination to actively address environmental threats and the extent to which healthcare providers demonstrate awareness of hazardous and protective circumstances [ 40 ]. Individuals with varying psychological traits, such as extroversion or introversion, exhibit distinct levels of sensitivity to environmental health [ 41 ].

Ecological sensitivity is a multidimensional concept that contributes significantly to sustainable development. This serves as an emotional foundation for cultivating an ecological worldview and establishing personal norms for pro-environmental actions. This dynamic framework takes shape within families during childhood and is strengthened throughout professional life. Therefore, an essential initial step in enhancing ecological sensitivity among healthcare providers is to impart ecological education and raise awareness levels [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. The development of ecological sensitivity is influenced by various factors, including families, educational institutions, mass media, and non-governmental organizations [ 45 , 46 , 47 ]. In general, nurses who actively engage in staying informed about ecological news and trends, participate in ecological protection activities and events, and demonstrate awareness of ecologically detrimental behaviors, both in themselves and their colleagues exhibit higher levels of ecological sensitivity [ 42 , 43 ].

Ecological literacy

Ecological literacy is a crucial concept that includes three core components: cognitive, emotional, and behavioral. According to UNESCO, there are five key characteristics of ecological literacy: awareness and sensitivity to the environment; comprehension of environmental issues; having values and sentiments towards environmental concerns; possessing skills, desire, and commitment; and actively engaging in identifying and resolving ecological problems. Generally, ecological literacy can be defined as the integration of environmental sensitivity, knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, responsibilities, and active engagement, which enables nurses to make informed and responsible decisions to promote environmental sustainability [ 48 , 49 ].

Model and additional cases

A model case serves as a paradigmatic illustration of the application of a concept encompassing all its defining elements. In addition to the model case, two other types of cases are presented: (A) the borderline case, which shares most of the essential characteristics of the concept but exhibits some differences; and (B) the contrary case, which presents an apparent example that contrasts with the concept, highlighting what it is not [ 21 ].

A 65-year-old woman was admitted to the neurology ward with a diagnosis of transient ischemic attack during the night shift. The attending nurse approached the patient’s bedside and introduced herself and the inpatient department. During the evaluation, the nurse observed the patients’ uneasiness, homesickness, and concerns regarding sleep disturbance due to changes in sleeping arrangements. She addressed the situation by repositioning the patient’s bed next to the window, aiming to provide a more comfortable environment and alleviate feelings of homesickness. Careful attention was paid to ensure that the bed and equipment were securely locked. During medication administration, the nurse utilized a tablet for dosage calculations, opting for a paperless approach to reduce waste. Proper disposal procedures were followed after medication administration, with empty vials discarded in the chemical waste bin, and needles placed in a safety box. During the initiation of infusion, the nurse noticed loose screws on the electronic infusion device and promptly sought assistance from a colleague to rectify the issue. Toward the end of her tasks, the nurse dimmed unnecessary lights in the ward and adjusted the alarm range of the device to an audible level for more comfort. Immediately before leaving the ward, the nurse noticed a leaking water tap and promptly contacted the facility manager to initiate immediate remedial action.

Borderline case

The head nurse of the pediatric ward conducted a clinical round when she heard the cries of a hospitalized 4-year-old child who was upset due to the absence of her cherished doll. Regrettably, the nurses disregarded the situation and continued down the corridor. Several months later, the nurse was invited to join a committee responsible for making decisions regarding hospital equipment procurement. Drawing from the recent knowledge acquired through a TV program highlighting the hazards of mercury to human health, she recommended the acquisition of mercury-free medical equipment.

Contrary case

A nurse, aged 35, with ten years of experience in surgery, approached the patient who had undergone laparotomy to perform a dressing change. The nurse inadvertently wore a pair of sterile gloves instead of non-sterile gloves while removing the contaminated dressing and disposed of it in the general waste bin. Subsequently, sterile gloves were replaced with a fresh pair, the wound was cleansed using six sterile gauzes, and an additional seven gauzes were applied to dress the surgical site, although a smaller quantity would have sufficed. During the hand washing process, the nurse’s mobile phone rang, and without turning off the water tap, he engaged in a conversation until the patient’s family intervened and turned off the tap. Finally, despite the patient expressing mild pain at the surgical site, the nurse chose to administer a painkiller instead of utilizing non-pharmacological methods to alleviate pain.

Identify antecedents and consequences

Walker and Avant (2011) provided a clear definition of antecedents as events or attributes that precede the occurrence of a concept, whereas consequences refer to events that ensue from the concept’s occurrence [ 21 ]. In this study, it was crucial to identify and examine the associated antecedents and consequences (Fig.  2 ). Therefore, the antecedents and consequences investigated are as follows:

Attributes, antecedents, and consequences of ecological caring in nursing practice

Antecedents

The ecological care provided by nurses can be influenced by both personal characteristics and organizational policies. Personal characteristics include creativity, innovation, responsibility, environmental friendliness [ 41 ], kindness, empathy, and strong communication skills [ 9 ]. Meanwhile, organizational policies encompass the establishment of a supportive organizational culture, provision of training courses [ 14 ], and design of a creative and humanitarian environment within hospitals and healthcare facilities. Moreover, ensuring a safe environment equipped with adequate resources, services, technology, and competent human resources is essential for delivering ecological care in therapeutic settings [ 15 ].

Consequences

Ecological care yields numerous benefits to patients, their families, healthcare providers, healthcare systems, and the environment. Among these benefits, one of the most significant is the provision of high-quality holistic care, which leads to increased patient satisfaction. Additionally, ecological care contributes to patient and staff safety by minimizing hospital infections, conserving energy (electricity, gases, and water), optimizing equipment and time utilization, reducing employee workload, managing hospital procurement costs, and eliminating hospital waste. It also plays a vital role in preventing the entry of pathogens, chemical pollutants, and radioactive substances into the water, soil, and air. Furthermore, ecological care promotes ecological sustainability, safeguards the ecosystem, and helps protect food and agricultural resources by preventing food waste in the hospital setting. These considerations highlight the wide-ranging positive consequences of ecological care [ 14 , 41 ].

Empirical referents

According to Walker and Avant (2011), the final step in concept analysis is to identify the empirical referents of attributes. Empirical referents do not directly serve as instruments for measuring a concept, but they provide illustrations of how defining characteristics or attributes can be recognized or measured. By presenting real-world examples, empirical referents assist in measuring the concept and validating its significance [ 21 ]. Although this study did not identify a specific independent instrument for measuring ecological care in nursing, the following examples demonstrate instruments that measure the defining characteristics or attributes of the concept.

The Nurse’s Environmental Awareness Tool (NEAT) was developed by Schenk et al. in 2015 to measure nurses’ awareness of and behaviors associated with the environmental impact of their practices. The NEAT consists of 48 two-part items in six subscales and three paired subsets as follows: nurse awareness scales, nurse professional ecological behaviors scales, and personal ecological behaviors scales [ 9 ].

The Ecological Risk Perception Scale, developed by Slimak and Dietz in 2006, examines not only the attributes of the risk itself but also the characteristics of individuals perceiving the risk. Consisting of 24 ecological risk items, the scale encompasses four subscales: ecological, chemical, global, and biological [ 50 ].

The Environmental Literacy Questionnaire (ELQ) was derived from part of Michigan State University’s project and was originally used by Kaplowitz and Levine (2005) [ 51 ]. Later, Kahyaoğlu (2011) revised the ELQ. The revised version consisted of four components: knowledge (11 items), attitude (12 items), uses (19 items), and concern (9 items) [ 52 ].

Based on the current analysis, ecological care is a multidimensional integration of thinking, attitudes, awareness, sensitivity, and literacy to deliver high-quality holistic care while maintaining environmental sustainability and promoting energy conservation.

Analysis of the concept of ecological care has significant implications for the nursing profession. Given the limited exploration of ecological care within nursing practice, conducting an analysis can empower nurses to utilize ecological factors in delivering high-quality care and embracing environmentally friendly behaviors. The objective of this study was to present a comprehensive and practical definition of ecological care, thereby establishing a shared platform for not only nurses but also other healthcare professionals to promote pro-environmental behaviors.

Backes et al. (2011) conducted a study aiming to comprehend the meaning of ecological care from the perspective of students and teachers in the healthcare field at a Public Institution of Higher Education. The study revealed several categories, including (a) ecological care as a result of relationships, interactions, and communication with the global environment (main category); (b) the development of ecological awareness (causal conditions); (c) the connection of ecological care with different systems (context); (d) the perception of human-environment-health interaction (intervention); (e) the need to foster ecological consciousness through new references (strategy); and (f) a sense of motivation to understand ecological care (result). While this study acknowledged ecological awareness and conscience as integral components of ecological care, other attributes of the concept, such as adopting an ecological perspective; ecological literacy; and the impact of values, beliefs, and organizational culture on providing holistic care, were not extensively explained [ 20 ].

The findings of a study conducted by Dahlberg et al. (2016) revealed how ecological care facilitates patients to rediscover their place in a world characterized by interconnectedness. The role of ecological care extends beyond perceiving patients within a web of relationships; it encompasses assisting patients in re-establishing their sense of self and comprehending the world anew. Ecological care entails not only combating illness but also acknowledging patients as individuals influenced by and influencing the world. Such care endeavors to facilitate rhythmic movement and create space for activity and rest, being cared for and actively participating in one’s recovery, withdrawing from the world, and re-engaging with it. This study also highlights the use of the term ecological perspective to enhance the understanding of optimal care for patients. In this study, the novel attributes of the concept of ecological care are introduced. However, the potential impacts of constructive and destructive human activities on ecosystems remain unexplored [ 1 ]. In contrast, we refer to ecological sustainability and energy conservation as significant consequences of ecological care in nursing.

In a focused ethnographic study, Al-Shamaly (2021) explored the culture of multidimensional “caring-for” practice among ICU nurses. The inclusive nature of this culture encompasses caring for oneself, patients and their families, and colleagues (including nurses and other team members) as well as ecological consciousness within the ICU environment and organization. Ecological consciousness involves caring for equipment and machines, ensuring workplace safety, reducing hazards, transitioning towards a paperless unit, maintaining thorough documentation, and demonstrating commitment and concern for the organization’s budget regarding staff and resources [ 15 ]. While this study comprehensively addresses the practical aspects of the concept, it constrains the concept of ecological care solely to ecological consciousness. However, our study revealed that ecological care is a multidimensional, and complex phenomenon that extends beyond ecological consciousness. In another study, religious values were identified as a crucial factor in promoting an ecological care orientation that can be incorporated into daily life through religious education, considering the religious and cultural context of each country. These values are instilled into individuals from childhood to adulthood through various learning activities. Therefore, religious education plays a pivotal role in shaping individuals’ commitment to ecological care [ 53 ]. According to this study, religious values significantly contribute to the development of ecological thinking and the manifestation of ecological behavior.

Moreover, a previous study by Akkuzu (2016) introduced ecological intelligence as a new type of conscience, defined as a combination of environmental awareness and the sensitivity of human beings towards adverse global alterations in nature. This understanding empowers individuals to recognize the perils faced by their communities and comprehend the underlying causes. Furthermore, it equips them with the knowledge necessary to address these perils collectively and devise effective solutions [ 54 ].

Implications for nursing practice

While our analysis primarily focused on the ecological perspective, we contend that a profound understanding of this concept is imperative for establishing cultural and political frameworks within the healthcare system. This study contributes to the limited body of research on nursing by highlighting the essentiality of ecological and holistic thinking in the domains of caregiving, treatment, management, and education. Consequently, it has the potential to yield substantial impacts in ensuring the safety of patients and healthcare providers, enhancing the quality of care, and improving patient and family satisfaction.

Limitations

The conceptual analysis is subject to several limitations. Firstly, the literature search was confined to studies published in English and Persian, potentially limiting the diversity of perspectives from other countries, cultures, and languages. To mitigate this limitation, future studies should conduct a comprehensive search in multiple languages to ensure a more holistic understanding of ecological care in nursing practice. Secondly, the analysis is susceptible to selection bias, extraction bias, and analysis bias. To address these limitations, the study selection process, data extraction, and analysis were independently conducted by two researchers. Despite these limitations, the studies were described accurately and systematically, contributing valuable insights into the concept of ecological care in nursing practice.

The results of the present analysis provide a definition of ecological care in nursing that may guide the profession to new directions of care, striving for the greater good of the patient, the profession of caring, and the environment. It is clear that more research is needed to discover the neglected importance of the environment in holistic care and to identify phenomena related to this concept in practical nursing. The literature review shows that the educational field, as the most effective factor, plays a significant role in the formation of ecological literacy and worldviews and the creation of the perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors of ecological care. In this regard, nursing professors and instructors, as the most important role models, significantly contribute to the development of the identity and character of ecological care for today’s students and future nurses.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data were not publicly available because of privacy or ethical restrictions.

Abbreviations

Carbon dioxide

Nitric oxide

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

Nurse’s Environmental Awareness Tool

Environmental Literacy Questionnaire

Intensive Care Unit

Dahlberg H, Ranheim A, Dahlberg K. Ecological caring-revisiting the original ideas of caring science. Int J Qualitative Stud Health well-being. 2016;11:33344.

Article   Google Scholar  

Sayan B, Kaya H. Assessment of the environmental risk perceptions and environmental attitudes of nursing students. Contemp Nurse. 2016;52(6):771–81.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Smiley RA, Allgeyer RL, Shobo Y, Lyons KC, Letourneau R, Zhong E, et al. The 2022 national nursing workforce survey. J Nurs Regul. 2023;14(1):S1–90.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Portela-Dos-Santos O, Melly P, Joost S, Verloo H. Climate Change, Environmental Health, and challenges for nursing Discipline. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(9):5682.

Lenzen M, Malik A, Li M, Fry J, Weisz H, Pichler P-P, et al. The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(7):e271–9.

Altunoğlu BD, Altunoğlu BD, Atav E. Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin çevre risk algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;36(36):1–11.

Google Scholar  

Eckelman MJ, Sherman J. Environmental Impacts of the U.S. Health Care System and Effects on Public Health. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0157014.

Ramokate T, Basu D. Health care waste management at an academic hospital: knowledge and practices of doctors and nurses. SAMJ: South Afr Med J. 2009;99(6):444–5.

Schenk E, Butterfield P, Postma J, Barbosa-Leiker C, Corbett C. Creating the nurses’ environmental awareness tool (NEAT). Workplace Health Saf. 2015;63(9):381–91.

Hanley F, Jakubec SL. Beyond the slogans: understanding the ecological consciousness of nurses to Advance Ecological Knowledge and Practice. Creat Nurs. 2019;25(3):232–40.

Nightingale F. Notes on nursing: what it is and what it is not. Philadelphia: PA: JB Lippincott; 1992.

Fawcett J. The metaparadigm of nursing. Present statements and future refinements: Image; 1984. 84 – 7 p.

ANA. Nurses’ Role in Addressing Global Climate Change, Climate Justice, and Health 2023 [ https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/official-position-statements/id/climate-change/

Laustsen G. Environment, ecosystems, and ecological behavior: a dialogue toward developing nursing ecological theory. Adv Nurs Sci. 2006;29(1):43–54.

Al-Shamaly HS. A focused ethnography of the culture of inclusive caring practice in the intensive care unit. Nurs open. 2021;8(6):2973–85.

Sattler B, Hall K. Healthy choices: transforming our hospitals into environmentally healthy and safe places. Online J Issues Nurs. 2007;12(2):3.

Hofmeyer A, Marck PB. Building social capital in healthcare organizations: thinking ecologically for safer care. Nurs Outlook. 2008;56(4):145–51.

Kleber J. Environmental stewardship: the nurse’s role in sustainability. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2018;22(3):354–6.

Letho Z, Yangdon T, Lhamo C, Limbu CB, Yoezer S, Jamtsho T, et al. Awareness and practice of medical waste management among healthcare providers in National Referral Hospital. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(1):e0243817.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Backes MT, Backes DS, Drago LC, Koerich MS, Erdmann AL. Ecological care as a broad and complex phenomenon. Revista brasileira de enfermagem. 2011;64(5):876–81.

Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall; 2011.

Ecological Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ecological . Accessed 23 Sep. 2023.

Merriam-Webster. Care Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/care . Accessed 23 Sep. 2023.

Schenk E. Development of the nurses’ environmental awareness tool. Washington State University; 2013.

Balgopal MM, Wallace AM. Decisions and dilemmas: using writing to learn activities to increase ecological literacy. J Environ Educ. 2009;40(3):13–26.

Esa N, Yunus H, Yakob N, Ibrahim MH, Ahmad MI. Enhancing students’ ecological thinking to improve understanding of environmental risk. Sustainable Living with Environmental Risks. 2014:265 – 72.

Ewald DR, Orsini MM, Strack RW. The path to good health: shifting the dialogue and promoting social ecological thinking. SSM Popul Health. 2023;22:101378.

Hes D, du Plessis C. Designing for Hope: Pathways to Regenerative Sustainability: Routledge; 2014.

Janmaimool P, Denpaiboon C. Evaluating determinants of rural villagers’ engagement in conservation and waste management behaviors based on integrated conceptual framework of pro-environmental behavior. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2016;12:1–20.

Ali A, Xiaoling G, Ali A, Sherwani M, Muneeb FM. Customer motivations for sustainable consumption: investigating the drivers of purchase behavior for a green-luxury car. Bus Strategy Environ. 2019;28(5):833–46.

Tarfaoui D, Zkim S. Ecological attitude-behavior gap: a theoretical analysis. Int J Econ Strateg Manag Bus Process. 2017;8:33–8.

Yayla Ö, Keskin E, Keles H. The relationship between environmental sensitivity, ecological attitude, and the ecological product purchasing behaviour of tourists. Eur J Tourism Hospitality Recreation. 2022;12(1):31–45.

Basavaraj TJ, Shashibhushan BL, Sreedevi A. To assess the knowledge, attitude and practices in biomedical waste management among health care workers in dedicated COVID hospital in Bangalore. Egypt J Intern Med. 2021;33(1).

Camponogara S, Ramos FRS, Kirchhof ALC. Reflexivity, knowledge and ecological awareness: premises for responsible action in the hospital work environment. Rev Latinoam Enferm. 2009;17:1030–6.

Biriukova N. The formation of an ecological consciousness. Russian Educ Soc. 2005;47(12):34–45.

Schenk EC. Development of the nurses’ environmental awareness tool. Washington State University; 2013.

Gök ND, Firat Kiliç H. Environmental awareness and sensitivity of nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;101:104882.

Joseph L, Paul H, Premkumar J, Paul R, Michael JS. Biomedical waste management: study on the awareness and practice among healthcare workers in a tertiary teaching hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015;33(1):129–31.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Mugivhisa LL, Dlamini N, Olowoyo JO. Adherence to safety practices and risks associated with health care waste management at an academic hospital, Pretoria, South Africa. Afr Health Sci Mar. 2020;20(1):453–68.

Yılmaz N, Erkal S. Determining undergraduate students’ environmental awareness and environmental sensitivity. World J Environ Res. 2016;6(4).

Pluess M. Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Dev Perspect. 2015;9(3):138–43.

Bodur G, Taşocak G. Nursing students’ views about environmental sensitivity in Turkey. J Hum Sci. 2013;10(1):820–31.

Karavin N, Geçim GYD, Memiş A. An overview of environmental attitudes, awareness, sensitivity, and literacy of nursing students in Turkey. Int J Sci Lett. 2023;5(1):345–52.

Bilavych HV, Borys UZ, Dovgij OJ, Savchuk AВ, Fedchyshyn NO, Fedoniuk LY, et al. Training of future professionals for sustainable development. Wiad Lek. 2022;75(3):697–707.

Jančius R, Gavenauskas A, Ūsas A. The influence of values and the social environment on the environmental attitudes of students: the case of Lithuania. Sustainability. 2021;13(20):11436.

Oğuz D, Ccedil I, Kavas S. Environmental awareness of University students in Ankara, Turkey. Afr J Agric Res. 2010;5(19).

Yahya BA, Ali SH, Saad DN. Assessment of Environmental awareness among students of the University Mosul. Mosul J Nurs. 2022;10(3).

Örs M. A measurement of the Environmental Literacy of Nursing Students for a sustainable environment. Sustainability. 2022;14(17):11003.

Fang W-T, Aa H, LePage BA. The living environmental education: sound science toward a cleaner, safer, and healthier future. Springer Nature; 2023.

Slimak MW, Dietz T. Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Anal. 2006;26(6):1689–705.

Kaplowitz MD, Levine R. How environmental knowledge measures up at a big ten university. Environ Educ R s. 2005;11(2):143–60.

Kahyaoğlu E. An Assessment of Environmental Literacy of Turkish Science and Technology Teachers [Doctoral Dissertion]. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University; 2011.

Fua J, Wekke I, Sabara Z, Nurlila R. Development of environmental care attitude of students through religion education approach in Indonesia. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2018;175:012229.

Akkuzu N. Towards a profound ecological understanding: statistical attempts to measure our ecological intelligence. Int J Social Sci Educ. 2016;6(2):198–216.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was extracted from a research project approved and supported by the Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (grant number: 73361). The authors would like to thank all those who spent valuable time participating in this research. We are also immensely grateful to the “anonymous” reviewers for their valuable insights.

The present study was financially supported by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Golshan Moghbeli, Mansour Ghafourifard, Shahla Shahbazi & Hanieh Aziz Karkan

Department of Nursing, Khoy University of Medical Sciences, Khoy, Iran

Amin Soheili

Medical Education Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Mansour Ghafourifard

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

GM, AS: original concept and study design; GM, HA, ShS: data collection; GM, HA, AS, MGh: data analysis and interpretation; GM, HA, AS, MGh, ShS: manuscript preparation and final critique; GM, MGh: study supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanieh Aziz Karkan .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Tabriz Tehran University of Medical Sciences (code of ethics: IR.TBZMED.REC.1402.614). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of Walker and Avant’s concept analysis method and qualitative research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary material 2, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Moghbeli, G., Soheili, A., Ghafourifard, M. et al. Ecological care in nursing practice: a Walker and Avant concept analysis. BMC Nurs 23 , 614 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02279-z

Download citation

Received : 24 March 2024

Accepted : 20 August 2024

Published : 02 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02279-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Ecological care
• Environment
• Concept analysis

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

• General enquiries: [email protected]

Untangling the nexus of entrepreneurship and unemployment: a bibliometric review

• Published: 04 September 2024
• Volume 14 , article number  30 , ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• Raunak Gupta   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-1813 1  

This research study has been done to uncover the important aspects of the research in the context of entrepreneurship as a tool to deal with the problem of unemployment in economies by understanding the trends of research studies, contributing authors, and their research contributions. The literature review in this research study has been done using bibliometric analysis and content analysis through the 316 research studies published in ABDC-rated journals from 2012 to 2022. The findings suggest that the previous studies focused on studying the different aspects, like the relationship between unemployment and entrepreneurship, the role of education and training, and the impact of public policies on employment generation aspects of entrepreneurship, along with the performance assessment of the entrepreneurial firms. However, the emphasis of previous studies was less on the performance assessment of the firms that started after unemployment. The findings from the literature review also revealed the impact of the rapidly evolving technological transformations due to artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies and the rising gig economy-based environment on employment generation and entrepreneurial endeavors in economies. This suggests that policymakers and practitioners look into designing relevant and effective policies and educational programs aligning with the changing employment and entrepreneurial landscape due to the impact of technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Impact of technological innovation on digital entrepreneurship and the effects on the economy

Data science for entrepreneurship research: studying demand dynamics for entrepreneurial skills in the Netherlands

A Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Entrepreneurship

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Abdesselam, R., Bonnet, J., & Renou-Maissant, P. (2014). Typology of the French regional development: Revealing the refugee versus Schumpeter effects in new-firm start-ups. Applied Economics, 46 (28), 3437–3451.

Article   Google Scholar  

Almeida, M., De Mello, J. M. C., & Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Social innovation in a developing country: Invention and diffusion of the Brazilian cooperative incubator. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 6 (3), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2012.048326

Annink, A., Gorgievski, M., & Den Dulk, L. (2016). Financial hardship and well-being: A cross-national comparison among the European self-employed. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25 (5), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1150263

Anosike, P. (2019). Entrepreneurship education as human capital: Implications for youth self-employment and conflict mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Industry and Higher Education, 33 (1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218812631

Arabiun, A., Salajegheh, N., Aeeni, Z., & Forghani, A. K. (2023). Trends and patterns in entrepreneurial action research: A bibliometric overview and research agenda. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 13 (1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-023-00350-8

Arenius, P., & Clercq, D. D. (2005). A network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small Business Economics, 24 , 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1988-6

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (4), 959–975.

Aubry, M., Bonnet, J., & Renou-Maissant, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship and the business cycle: The “Schumpeter” effect versus the “refugee” effect—A French appraisal based on regional data. The Annals of Regional Science, 54 , 23–55.

Audretsch, D. B. (2007). Entrepreneurship capital and economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23 (1), 63–78.

Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth . Oxford University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Audretsch, D. B., Dohse, D., & Niebuhr, A. (2015). Regional unemployment structure and new firm formation. Papers in Regional Science , 94 :S115–S138. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12169

Baah-Boateng, W. (2013). Determinants of unemployment in Ghana. African Development Review, 25 (4), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12037

Baptista, R., Karaöz, M., & Mendonça, J. (2014). The impact of human capital on the early success of necessity versus opportunity-based entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 42 , 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9502-z

Beladi, H., & Kar, S. (2014). Unemployment benefits and entrepreneurship. The Japanese Economic Review, 65 , 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jere.12023

Biehl, A. M., Gurley-Calvez, T., & Hill, B. (2014). Self-employment of older Americans: Do recessions matter? Small Business Economics, 42 , 297–309.

Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2013). Life satisfaction and self-employment: A matching approach. Small Business Economics, 40 , 1009–1033.

Boubker, O., Arroud, M., & Ouajdouni, A. (2021). Entrepreneurship education versus management students’ entrepreneurial intentions. A PLS-SEM approach. The International Journal of Management Education, 19 (1), 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100450

Bourlès, R., & Cozarenco, A. (2018). Entrepreneurial motivation and business performance: Evidence from a French microfinance institution. Small Business Economics, 51 (4), 943–963.

Boyd, R. L. (2012). Race, self-employment, and labor absorption: Black and White women in domestic service in the Urban South during the great depression. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 71 (3), 639–661.

Brixiová, Z., Ncube, M., & Bicaba, Z. (2015). Skills and youth entrepreneurship in Africa: Analysis with evidence from Swaziland. World Development, 67 , 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.027

Caliendo, M., Hogenacker, J., Künn, S., & Wießner, F. (2015). Subsidized start-ups out of unemployment: A comparison to regular business start-ups. Small Business Economics, 45 , 165–190.

Caliendo, M., Künn, S., & Weissenberger, M. (2020). Catching up or lagging behind? The long-term business and innovation potential of subsidized start-ups out of unemployment. Research Policy, 49 (10), 104053.

Capelleras, J. L., Contín-Pilart, I., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Martin-Sanchez, V. (2016). Unemployment and growth aspirations: The moderating role of education. Strategic Change, 25 (2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2054

Castaño, M. S., Méndez, M. T., & Galindo, M. Á. (2016). The effect of public policies on entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. Journal of Business Research, 69 (11), 5280–5285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.125

Cheratian, I., Golpe, A., Goltabar, S., & Iglesias, J. (2020). The unemployment-entrepreneurship nexus: New evidence from 30 Iranian provinces. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15 (3), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-02-2019-0084

Cole, I. M. (2018). Unemployment and entrepreneurship in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States: a spatial panel data analysis. Review of Regional Studies, 48 (3), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.7992

Comerio, N., & Strozzi, F. (2019). Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools. Tourism Economics, 25 (1), 109–131.

Congregado, E., Golpe, A., & Van Stel, A. (2012). The ‘recession-push’ hypothesis reconsidered. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8 , 325–342.

Congregado, E., Millán, J. M., & Román, C. (2014). The emergence of new entrepreneurs in Europe. International Economics, 138 , 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2014.01.002

Constant, A. F., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2014). Self-employment against employment or unemployment: Markov transitions across the business cycle. Eurasian Business Review, 4 , 51–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-014-0005-x

Coomes, P. A., Fernandez, J., & Gohmann, S. F. (2013). The rate of proprietorship among metropolitan areas: The impact of the local economic environment and capital resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (4), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00511.x

Cumming, D. J., & Fischer, E. (2012). Publicly funded business advisory services and entrepreneurial outcomes. Research Policy, 41 (2), 467–481.

da Fonseca, J. G. (2022). Unemployment, entrepreneurship and firm outcomes. Review of Economic Dynamics, 45 , 322–338.

Danson, M., Galloway, L., & Sherif, M. (2021). From unemployment to self-employment: Can enterprise policy intensify the risks of poverty? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 75 , 102164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102164

Debrulle, J. (2016). The role of entrepreneurship in the context of career trajectories: Moving back into wage employment or into unemployment? Labour, 30 (2), 180–197.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133 , 285–296.

Doran, J., McCarthy, N., & O’Connor, M. (2018). The role of entrepreneurship in stimulating economic growth in developed and developing countries. Cogent Economics and Finance, 6 (1), 1442093. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1442093

Dvouletý, O. (2022). Starting business out of unemployment: How do supported self-employed individuals perform? Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 12 (1), 1–23.

Eresia-Eke, C., & Okerue, C. (2020). Owner-manager human capital and business coping ability in African immigrant small businesses in Southern Africa. Development Southern Africa, 37 (2), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2019.1701414

Feinberg, R. M., & Kuehn, D. (2020). Does a guaranteed basic income encourage entrepreneurship? Evidence from Alaska. Review of Industrial Organization, 57 (3), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-020-09786-8

Figueiredo, E., & Paiva, T. (2018). Senior entrepreneurship and qualified senior unemployment: The case of the Portuguese Northern region. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26 (3), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0006

Fossen, F. M. (2021). Self-employment over the business cycle in the USA: A decomposition. Small Business Economics, 57 (4), 1837–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00375-3

Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2 (2), 171–188.

Gohmann, S. F., & Fernandez, J. M. (2014). Proprietorship and unemployment in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (2), 289–309.

González-Sánchez, V. M. (2015). Factors promoting entrepreneurship in European countries: Unemployment, taxes, and education. Journal of Promotion Management, 21 (4), 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2015.1051405

Hacamo, I., & Kleiner, K. (2022). Forced entrepreneurs. The Journal of Finance, 77 (1), 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13097

Henley, A. (2017). The post-crisis growth in the self-employed: Volunteers or reluctant recruits? Regional Studies, 51 (9), 1312–1323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1184753

Hombert, J., Schoar, A., Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2020). Can unemployment insurance spur entrepreneurial activity? Evidence from France. The Journal of Finance, 75 (3), 1247–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12880

Horta, H., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2016). Skilled unemployment and the creation of academic spin-offs: A recession-push hypothesis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41 , 798–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9405-z

Ikebuaku, K., & Dinbabo, M. (2018). Beyond entrepreneurship education: Business incubation and entrepreneurial capabilities. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 10 (1), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2017-0022

Jena, R. K. (2020). Measuring the impact of business management Student’s attitude towards entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 107 , 106275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106275

Kachlami, H., Yazdanfar, D., & Öhman, P. (2017). Regional demand and supply factors of social entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 24 (3), 714–733. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2016-0292

Koellinger, P. D., & Roy Thurik, A. (2012). Entrepreneurship and the business cycle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94 (4), 1143–1156.

Komarek, T., & Loveridge, S. (2015). Firm sizes and economic development: Estimating long-term effects on US county growth, 1990–2000. Journal of Regional Science, 55 (2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12159

Koyana, S., & Mason, R. B. (2017). Rural entrepreneurship and transformation: The role of learnerships. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 23 (5), 734–751. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2016-0207

Laffineur, C., Barbosa, S. D., Fayolle, A., & Nziali, E. (2017). Active labor market programs’ effects on entrepreneurship and unemployment. Small Business Economics, 49 , 889–918.

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., ... & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration.  Annals of internal medicine ,  151 (4), W-65.

Lourenço, F., Taylor, T. G., & Taylor, D. W. (2013). Integrating “education for entrepreneurship” in multiple faculties in “half-the-time” to enhance graduate entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20 (3), 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2013-0052

Lukman, S., Bao, P. X., Kweku‐Lugu, B., Arkorful, V. E., Latif, A., Gadabu, A., ... & Sadiq, M. A. (2021). Diasporan students social entrepreneurship intention: The moderating role of institutional support.  Journal of Public Affairs ,  21 (1), e2108. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2108

Luque, A., & Jones, M. R. (2019). Differences in self-employment duration by year of entry & pre-entry wage-sector attachment. Journal of Labor Research, 40 , 24–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-018-9275-x

MacLennan, M., Soares, F. V., & Robino, C. (2015).  Social protection, entrepreneurship and labour market activation  (No. 32). Policy in Focus.

Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90 , 46–60.

McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30 (1), 50–65.

Meoli, M., Pierucci, E., & Vismara, S. (2020). The effects of public policies in fostering university spinoffs in Italy. In  Assessing Technology and Innovation Policies  (pp. 83–96). Routledge.

Michaelides, M., & Benus, J. (2012). Are self-employment training programs effective? Evidence from project GATE. Labour Economics, 19 (5), 695–705.

Millán, J. M., Congregado, E., & Román, C. (2012). Determinants of self-employment survival in Europe. Small Business Economics, 38 , 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9260-0

Millán, J. M., Congregado, E., & Román, C. (2014). Persistence in entrepreneurship and its implications for the European entrepreneurial promotion policy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36 (1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.001

Mühlböck, M., Warmuth, J. R., Holienka, M., & Kittel, B. (2018). Desperate entrepreneurs: No opportunities, no skills. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14 , 975–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0472-5

Mungaray-Lagarda, A., Osorio-Novela, G., & Ramírez-Angulo, N. (2022). Service-learning to foster microenterprise development in Mexico. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12 (1), 50–63.

Munkejord, M. C. (2017). Immigrant entrepreneurship contextualised: Becoming a female migrant entrepreneur in rural Norway. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11 (2), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-05-2015-0029

Mura, P., & Pahlevan Sharif, S. (2015). The crisis of the ‘crisis of representation’–Mapping qualitative tourism research in Southeast Asia. Current Issues in Tourism, 18 (9), 828–844.

Nikolova, M. (2019). Switching to self-employment can be good for your health. Journal of Business Venturing, 34 (4), 664–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.001

Nikolova, M., Nikolaev, B., & Popova, O. (2021). The perceived well-being and health costs of exiting self-employment. Small Business Economics, 57 (4), 1819–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00374-4

Novejarque Civera, J., Pisá Bó, M., & López-Muñoz, J. F. (2021). Do contextual factors influence entrepreneurship? Spain’s regional evidences. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17 (1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00625-1

O’Keeffe, P., & Papadopoulos, A. (2021). The Australian Government’s business-friendly employment response to COVID-19: A critical discourse analysis. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 32 (3), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304621997891

O’Keeffe, P., Johnson, B., & Daley, K. (2022). Continuing the precedent: Financially disadvantaging young people in “unprecedented” COVID-19 times. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 57 (1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.152

O’Leary, D. (2022). Unemployment and entrepreneurship across high-, middle-and low-performing European regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 9 (1), 571–580.

Olutuase, S. O., Brijlal, P., & Yan, B. (2023). Model for stimulating entrepreneurial skills through entrepreneurship education in an African context. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 35 (2), 263–283.

Parker, S. C. (2009). Economics of entrepreneurship . Cambridge University Press.

Qureshi, S., & Mian, S. (2021). Transfer of entrepreneurship education best practices from business schools to engineering and technology institutions: Evidence from Pakistan. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46 , 366–392.

Ralph, A., & Arora, A. (2022). A bibliometric study of reference literature on youth unemployment. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 17 (6), 1338–1367.

Røed, K., & Skogstrøm, J. F. (2014). Unemployment insurance and entrepreneurship. Labour, 28 (4), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12040

Román, C., Congregado, E., & Millán, J. M. (2013). Start-up incentives: Entrepreneurship policy or active labour market programme? Journal of Business Venturing, 28 (1), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.01.004

Salamzadeh, Y., Sangosanya, T. A., Salamzadeh, A., & Braga, V. (2022). Entrepreneurial universities and social capital: The moderating role of entrepreneurial intention in the Malaysian context. The International Journal of Management Education, 20 (1), 100609.

Simón-Moya, V., Revuelto-Taboada, L., & Guerrero, R. F. (2014). Institutional and economic drivers of entrepreneurship: An international perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67 (5), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.033

Sorenson, O., Dahl, M. S., Canales, R., & Burton, M. D. (2021). Do startup employees earn more in the long run? Organization Science, 32 (3), 587–604.

Sudana, I. M., Apriyani, D., Supraptono, E., & Kamis, A. (2019). Business incubator training management model to increase graduate competency. Benchmarking An International Journal, 26 (3), 773–787.

Thurik, A. R., Carree, M. A., Van Stel, A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2008). Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (6), 673–686.

Uduji, J. I., & Okolo-Obasi, E. N. (2022). Empowerment of rural young people in informal farm entrepreneurship: The role of corporate social responsibility in Nigeria’s oil producing communities. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 16 (6), 924–947.

Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13 , 27–56.

Wennekers, S., Van Wennekers, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24 , 293–309.

Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Cabrero, D. G., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Mendonca, H., Angula, S. S., & Onwordi, L. (2017). Promoting entrepreneurship amid youth in Windhoek’s informal settlements: A Namibian case. Science, Technology and Society, 22 (2), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721817702294

Xie, Z., Wang, X., Xie, L., & Duan, K. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and the quality and quantity of regional entrepreneurship: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Research, 128 , 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.015

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Policy, Advocacy, Knowledge, and Research, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, Gandhinagar, India

Raunak Gupta

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The contribution share of the author is 100%. RG has been involved in this research study through its conceptualization, literature review, methodology, calculations, and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raunak Gupta .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Entrepreneurship: Shaping the Future.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Gupta, R. Untangling the nexus of entrepreneurship and unemployment: a bibliometric review. J Glob Entrepr Res 14 , 30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-024-00400-9

Download citation

Received : 23 May 2024

Accepted : 25 August 2024

Published : 04 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-024-00400-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Bibliometric analysis
• Entrepreneurship
• Self-employment
• Systematic literature review
• Unemployment
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research