presentation board 36 x 48

25% off your total pick-up or curbside order*   Apply

$3.99 shipping on all orders*    Apply

Pick-Up In-Store & Get $5 off your next In-Store purchase*   Learn More

• Back To School
• School Supplies
• Poster Board

Royal Brites White Tri Fold Foam Board 36"x48"

By  elmer's |.

• y_2024, m_9, d_24, h_7
• bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.42
• cp_1, bvpage1
• co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_4
• loc_en_US, sid_7638380, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
• clientName_joann
• 10% off your order of $85+, 15% off $100+, or 20% off $150+ | Free Shipping over $75 when you use code: Apply Code GET10NOW

Buy more save more

0 available

Description

Royal Brites White Tri-Fold Foam Board is lightweight, sturdy and easy to handle. Perfect for science fair projects, business presentations, crafts and more. The board size is 36 x 48 inches open and 36 x 24 inches closed. Pair with our Royal Brites Poster Boards sold separately.

• 48"x36"x0.19"

Shipping & Returns

CURBSIDE & IN-STORE PICK-UP

Most items typically ship within 1-3 business days, you'll receive an email with tracking information as soon as that happens! You can usually expect delivery within 6-10 business days, after you place your order, depending on destination.    LEARN MORE

We want you to be completely satisfied, so we are happy to accept returns for most online purchases in-stores for free or by mail, minus a $7.95 shipping and handling fee. Sewing Machines (all brands) & Craft Tech Machines (all brands) require a $25 restocking fee if returned by the customer. For policy exclusions, including electronics, please review our RETURN POLICY.

Just For You

You may also like, frequently bought together, recently viewed, #handmadewithjoann, win a $100 joann gift card.

Images from our reviewers

Tri-Fold Project Board, 36" x 48", White

Similar items, product description.

• 2-ply, heavy-duty corrugate material for durability
• Strong, lightweight and pre-scored fold-out panels
• Works well with adhesives, paints and markers. Ideal for signs, presentations and more
• Contains Recycled Content - See Specs for Details.
• Dry Erase & Whiteboard Buying Guide

Product Specifications

• Brand Name Office Depot
• Color White
• Color Family White
• Country of Origin US
• Depth 1/2 in.
• Features Foldable
• Height 36 in.
• Manufacturer OFFICE DEPOT
• Manufacturer Part Number 434415
• Material Corrugated Cardboard
• Material Family Paper
• Packaging 1
• Post-Consumer Recycled Content Percent 60 %
• Product Line Tri-Fold Corrugate Project Boards
• Product Type Project Display Board
• Refurbished N
• Thickness 1/2 in.
• Total Recycled Content Percent 72 %
• Water Resistance No
• Width 48 in.

Question and Answer

More ways to save, weekly deals, coupon center, clearance deals.

Feature prioritization template

Prioritize features using data and trusted frameworks

Use this template to make informed decisions and prioritize features based on a combination of guided principles and data. The feature prioritization template empowers product managers to guide prioritization decisions with two tried and true frameworks: MoSCoW and RICE.

We recommend using the MoSCoW method for prioritizing features that take your product from 0 to 1, or pre-product market fit.

RICE scoring is best for prioritizing features that take your product from 1 to N, or post-product market fit.

The feature prioritization template helps you:

• Clearly outline your priorities
• Get aligned with stakeholders on priorities and next steps
• Mitigate risk using proven methods and data-driven decision making
• Make efficient use of resources

How to use the feature prioritization template

To use Mural’s feature prioritization template with your team, follow the steps outlined below.

1. Prepare by answering the four questions

The first step in feature prioritization is to make sure you have answers for the following questions:

• Do you have a solid strategy and clear prioritization criteria?
• Are you chasing a trend or will this have lasting impact?
• Who are you mainly listening to? The loudest speaker or biggest customer?
• Are you only responding to your competitors’ features (feature parity)?

2. Determine the best framework for current state

Next, determine which stage of the process best fits your journey: Is this a pre-market exercise? If so, it’s best to use the MoSCoW method. Is this about scaling an established solution? Then you should use the RICE scoring model.

MoSCoW method

The MoSCoW method is a prioritization technique used in project management and product development to categorize requirements or features based on their importance and urgency. The acronym "MoSCoW" stands for:

• Must have : These are the requirements or features that are critical and essential for the project's success. They are considered non-negotiable and must be delivered within the specified timeframe.
• Should have : These requirements or features are important but not critical for the project's immediate success. They are considered high-priority items that should be included if possible, but their omission would not jeopardize the project's overall viability.
• Could have : These requirements or features are desirable but not necessary for the project's core functionality. They are considered nice-to-have items that can be included if time and resources permit.
• Won't have (this time) : These are the requirements or features that are explicitly excluded from the current project scope. They are considered low-priority or non-essential items that will not be addressed in the current iteration or release.

The MoSCoW method helps teams prioritize and make decisions about which requirements or features to focus on, especially when faced with limited time, resources, or tight deadlines. It provides a framework for stakeholders to align their expectations and make informed decisions about what is critical, important, or optional for the project's success.

RICE scoring model

The RICE scoring model is a prioritization framework used to evaluate and rank ideas, features, or projects based on their potential impact, effort required, confidence level, and reach. The acronym "RICE" stands for:

• Reach : This factor measures the number of users or customers who will be affected by the idea, feature, or project. It quantifies the potential reach or audience size. For example, if a feature will impact all users, the reach score would be high.
• Impact : This factor assesses the potential impact or benefit that the idea, feature, or project will have on users or the business. It quantifies the expected positive outcomes, such as increased revenue, improved user experience, or enhanced efficiency. The impact score reflects the magnitude of the expected impact.
• Confidence : This factor represents the level of confidence or certainty that the team has in the estimates for reach and impact. It takes into account the availability of data, user research, market analysis, or any other relevant information that supports the estimates. The confidence score reflects the reliability of the reach and impact assessments.
• Effort : This factor evaluates the level of effort, resources, and time required to implement the idea, feature, or project. It considers factors such as development complexity, design work, testing, and any other necessary tasks. The effort score reflects the estimated workload or investment needed.

Each factor is assigned a score from 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest. Once the scores for each factor are determined, they are multiplied together to calculate the RICE score:

RICE Score = Reach x Impact x Confidence / Effort

Higher RICE scores indicate higher priority items that are expected to have a significant impact, reach a large audience, and require relatively less effort.

3. Capture any questions, ideas, and other considerations

After you’ve gone through the appropriate exercise, make sure that you give space to your team to brainstorm any related ideas, answer questions, and record other considerations that may factor into the success of your feature(s).

Tips for running a feature prioritization template exercise

To get the most out of the Mural feature prioritization template, built by the Product School of Silicon Valley, you should:

• Before bringing the team together, go through the four questions at the beginning of the template to make sure you’re prepared and can make the group effort as effective and rewarding as possible
• Use tools like anonymous voting and private mode to get honest feedback and determine next steps, as well as avoid groupthink when brainstorming
• Once you’ve conducted your exercise, share it with stakeholders to make sure you have broad alignment and a clear vision for next steps

How to create a Feature prioritization template

Mural makes it easy to collaborate visually and make informed decisions.

Real-time collaboration

Add more productivity and engagement to meetings and calls with features to guide collaboration.

Sticky notes & text

Add ideas, action items, and more as a sticky note or text box — then change the colors and cluster to identify patterns and new solutions.

Anonymous voting

Gain consensus and reach alignment quickly, either in real time or asynchronously.

Private mode

Avoid groupthink and get authentic feedback by allowing collaborators to add content privately.

Easy sharing

There are no barriers to collaboration with the ability to safely and securely share murals with others.

Video meeting integrations

Seamlessly add visual collaboration to meetings with Microsoft Teams, Webex, and Zoom integrations.

Feature prioritization template frequently asked questions

What are the benefits of a feature prioritization template, how do you prioritize features.

Template by Product School

Mural is the only platform that offers both a shared workspace and training on the LUMA System™, a practical way to collaborate that anyone can learn and apply.

More Evaluate templates

Pros and cons list

Workshop summary

Weekly team retrospective

MoSCoW Matrix Template

Use the MoSCow Method to efficiently place deliverables in a matrix to understand their importance to your team’s projects.

About the MoSCoW Matrix Template

When you’re working on a project with a lot of deliverables, it can be difficult to track priorities. And as deadlines approach, sometimes priorities can shift, further complicating your workflow. How can you keep track of evolving priorities and still focus on a complex project? 

What is the MoSCoW method?

The MoSCoW method is a powerful technique for tracking priorities, which are categorized and placed in a matrix model. Project managers, product developers, and business analysts use the matrix to align their teams when working through a set of project deliverables. Teams collaborate with stakeholders to analyze and rank the importance of deliverables with MoSCoW, making it easier to stay on track. 

MoSCoW is an acronym for Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won’t Have. These four priority categories make up the four segments in the matrix. “Must Have” items are necessary for delivery; “Should Have” items are important but not necessary; “Could Have” items are nice to have (they are not priorities, but your team can work on them if time and resources permit); and “Won’t Have” items do not fit into the scope of the current project. To use MoSCoW, you create four category segments showing your current priorities and their status (Complete, In Progress, or Not Yet Started). 

When to use the MoSCoW method

The MoSCoW method is useful whenever you need to present business needs to an audience, assess priorities, and collaborate on impending deliverables with a group of stakeholders. By drawing and updating the matrix, you can get a snapshot of your priorities and their impact at each stage of a project. MoSCoW allows everyone on your team to easily grasp upcoming tasks and their impact on your timeline.

Create your own MoSCoW matrix

Making your own MoSCoW matrix is easy. Miro comes with the perfect canvas to create and share it. Get started by selecting the MoSCoW matrix template, then take the following steps to make one of your own.

Fill in your must-haves.  The MoSCoW matrix is divided into four categories. The first is Must Haves, the items that are necessary for completion of your project. If you’re unsure whether a task is a Must-have, ask yourself the following questions: If you do not complete this task, will your product or service work as intended? Can you still deliver the product without this item? Does this task allow you to fulfill all legal requirements for your project? Will your product or service be safe without it? Will your customer suffer consequences if you fail to complete this task?

Fill in your should-haves.  Next, move on to the items that are not necessary to complete your project but are still important for success. Remember, the items in this category are not  vital , but you should try and incorporate them into your timeline anyway. If you’re unsure, ask yourself: Although it might be painful not to complete this task, could you still ship the product without it? Can you use a workaround to avoid this task?

Fill in your could-haves.  Many teams colloquially refer to these items as “nice-to-haves.” While they might make the service run more smoothly or make your product look better, these tasks are not important. If you have the time or resources to complete them at the end, then you can do so. If not, you can plan to do them later. To fill out this part of the matrix, ask yourself the following questions: What are the benefits of these tasks? Do they outweigh the costs? How will these tasks impact our timeline? Can we still complete the project on time and within budget if we include these tasks?

Fill out your won’t-haves.  These items are outside the scope of your current project. Maybe you don’t have the budget to complete them, or maybe they don’t fit into your timeline. If you’re not quite sure whether something is a Won’t Have, ask yourself: How does this item impact our budget? Does our team have the bandwidth to complete this task? Will this item have a tangible impact on our customers? No one likes to admit that they can’t complete something, but don’t think of Won’t Haves as failures; they’re projects for another day.

How do you use the MoSCow template?

The MoSCoW acronym (excluding the o's) is carved with the first letters of the priority categories it works with. These are Must-haves, Should-haves, Could-haves and Won't-haves. And that's how you can define which task falls into which category.

What are the benefits of using the MoSCow method?

The key benefits of the MoSCoW technique are that it's quick and easy to use. The technique is good for highlighting the priorities of projects that are in progress and for organizing efficient time management.

Get started with this template right now.

Check-In Icebreaker Template

Works best for:.

Icebreakers, Meetings

Run a dynamic online session with the Check-in Icebreaker Template. Use this icebreaker before your meeting to boost energy levels, connect people, and warm up the room.

SIPOC Template

Agile Methodology, Strategic Planning, Mapping

A SIPOC diagram maps a process at a high level by identifying the potential gaps between suppliers and input specifications and between customers and output specifications. SIPOC identifies feedback and feed-forward loops between customers, suppliers, and the processes and jump-starts the team to think in terms of cause and effect.

Action Priority Matrix Template

You and your teammates probably have more ideas than resources, which can make it difficult to prioritize tasks. Use an Action Priority Matrix to help choose the order in which you will work on your tasks, allowing you to save time and money and avoid getting bogged down in unnecessary work. An Action Priority Matrix is a simple diagram that allows you to score tasks based on their impact and the effort needed to complete them. You use your scores to plot each task in one of four quadrants: quick wins, major projects, fill-ins, and thankless tasks.

Product Backlog Template

Agile Methodology, Kanban Boards, Product Management

Development teams are often juggling many products at once. A product backlog is a project management tool that helps teams keep track of projects in flight as they build and iterate, so you can store everyone's ideas, plan epics, and prioritize tasks. The highest-priority tasks are at the top of the product backlog, so your team knows what to work on first. Product backlogs make it easier for teams to plan and allocate resources, but it also provides a single source of truth for everyone to know what development teams are working on.

Status Report Template

Project Management, Documentation, Strategic Planning

A status report provides a snapshot of how something is going at a given time. You can provide a status report for a project, a team, or a situation, as long as it emphasizes and maps out a project’s chain of events. If you’re a project manager, you can use this report to keep historical records of project timelines. Ideally, any project stakeholder should be able to look at a status report and answer the question, “Where are we, and how did we get here?” Use this template as a starting point to summarize how something is progressing against a projected plan or outcome.

Milestone Chart Template

Project Management, Strategic Planning, Project Planning

When your team is collaborating on a large project, keeping track of the many tasks and multiple timelines can be a challenge. That’s why you need a milestone chart. These visual representations of important project events will make it simple for your team to stay on schedule and reach goals on time. And it’s so easy to get started — just determine the major milestones, use our template to create a milestone chart, and define the key dates and deliverables each milestone will require.

• Integrations
• Learning Center

MoSCoW Prioritization

What is moscow prioritization.

MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements. 

  The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the “W” in MoSCoW to mean “wish.”

What is the History of the MoSCoW Method?

Software development expert Dai Clegg created the MoSCoW method while working at Oracle. He designed the framework to help his team prioritize tasks during development work on product releases.

You can find a detailed account of using MoSCoW prioritization in the Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM) handbook . But because MoSCoW can prioritize tasks within any time-boxed project, teams have adapted the method for a broad range of uses.

How Does MoSCoW Prioritization Work?

Before running a MoSCoW analysis, a few things need to happen. First, key stakeholders and the product team need to get aligned on objectives and prioritization factors. Then, all participants must agree on which initiatives to prioritize.

At this point, your team should also discuss how they will settle any disagreements in prioritization. If you can establish how to resolve disputes before they come up, you can help prevent those disagreements from holding up progress.

Finally, you’ll also want to reach a consensus on what percentage of resources you’d like to allocate to each category.

With the groundwork complete, you may begin determining which category is most appropriate for each initiative. But, first, let’s further break down each category in the MoSCoW method.

Start prioritizing your roadmap

Moscow prioritization categories.

1. Must-have initiatives

As the name suggests, this category consists of initiatives that are “musts” for your team. They represent non-negotiable needs for the project, product, or release in question. For example, if you’re releasing a healthcare application, a must-have initiative may be security functionalities that help maintain compliance.

The “must-have” category requires the team to complete a mandatory task. If you’re unsure about whether something belongs in this category, ask yourself the following.

If the product won’t work without an initiative, or the release becomes useless without it, the initiative is most likely a “must-have.”

2. Should-have initiatives

Should-have initiatives are just a step below must-haves. They are essential to the product, project, or release, but they are not vital. If left out, the product or project still functions. However, the initiatives may add significant value.

“Should-have” initiatives are different from “must-have” initiatives in that they can get scheduled for a future release without impacting the current one. For example, performance improvements, minor bug fixes, or new functionality may be “should-have” initiatives. Without them, the product still works.

3. Could-have initiatives

Another way of describing “could-have” initiatives is nice-to-haves. “Could-have” initiatives are not necessary to the core function of the product. However, compared with “should-have” initiatives, they have a much smaller impact on the outcome if left out.

So, initiatives placed in the “could-have” category are often the first to be deprioritized if a project in the “should-have” or “must-have” category ends up larger than expected.

4. Will not have (this time)

One benefit of the MoSCoW method is that it places several initiatives in the “will-not-have” category. The category can manage expectations about what the team will not include in a specific release (or another timeframe you’re prioritizing).

Placing initiatives in the “will-not-have” category is one way to help prevent scope creep . If initiatives are in this category, the team knows they are not a priority for this specific time frame. 

Some initiatives in the “will-not-have” group will be prioritized in the future, while others are not likely to happen. Some teams decide to differentiate between those by creating a subcategory within this group.

How Can Development Teams Use MoSCoW?

  Although Dai Clegg developed the approach to help prioritize tasks around his team’s limited time, the MoSCoW method also works when a development team faces limitations other than time. For example: 

Prioritize based on budgetary constraints.

What if a development team’s limiting factor is not a deadline but a tight budget imposed by the company? Working with the product managers, the team can use MoSCoW first to decide on the initiatives that represent must-haves and the should-haves. Then, using the development department’s budget as the guide, the team can figure out which items they can complete. 

Prioritize based on the team’s skillsets.

A cross-functional product team might also find itself constrained by the experience and expertise of its developers. If the product roadmap calls for functionality the team does not have the skills to build, this limiting factor will play into scoring those items in their MoSCoW analysis.

Prioritize based on competing needs at the company.

Cross-functional teams can also find themselves constrained by other company priorities. The team wants to make progress on a new product release, but the executive staff has created tight deadlines for further releases in the same timeframe. In this case, the team can use MoSCoW to determine which aspects of their desired release represent must-haves and temporarily backlog everything else.

What Are the Drawbacks of MoSCoW Prioritization?

  Although many product and development teams have prioritized MoSCoW, the approach has potential pitfalls. Here are a few examples.

1. An inconsistent scoring process can lead to tasks placed in the wrong categories.

  One common criticism against MoSCoW is that it does not include an objective methodology for ranking initiatives against each other. Your team will need to bring this methodology to your analysis. The MoSCoW approach works only to ensure that your team applies a consistent scoring system for all initiatives.

Pro tip: One proven method is weighted scoring, where your team measures each initiative on your backlog against a standard set of cost and benefit criteria. You can use the weighted scoring approach in ProductPlan’s roadmap app .

2. Not including all relevant stakeholders can lead to items placed in the wrong categories.

To know which of your team’s initiatives represent must-haves for your product and which are merely should-haves, you will need as much context as possible.

For example, you might need someone from your sales team to let you know how important (or unimportant) prospective buyers view a proposed new feature.

One pitfall of the MoSCoW method is that you could make poor decisions about where to slot each initiative unless your team receives input from all relevant stakeholders. 

3. Team bias for (or against) initiatives can undermine MoSCoW’s effectiveness.

Because MoSCoW does not include an objective scoring method, your team members can fall victim to their own opinions about certain initiatives. 

One risk of using MoSCoW prioritization is that a team can mistakenly think MoSCoW itself represents an objective way of measuring the items on their list. They discuss an initiative, agree that it is a “should have,” and move on to the next.

But your team will also need an objective and consistent framework for ranking all initiatives. That is the only way to minimize your team’s biases in favor of items or against them.

When Do You Use the MoSCoW Method for Prioritization?

MoSCoW prioritization is effective for teams that want to include representatives from the whole organization in their process. You can capture a broader perspective by involving participants from various functional departments.

Another reason you may want to use MoSCoW prioritization is it allows your team to determine how much effort goes into each category. Therefore, you can ensure you’re delivering a good variety of initiatives in each release.

What Are Best Practices for Using MoSCoW Prioritization?

If you’re considering giving MoSCoW prioritization a try, here are a few steps to keep in mind. Incorporating these into your process will help your team gain more value from the MoSCoW method.

1. Choose an objective ranking or scoring system.

Remember, MoSCoW helps your team group items into the appropriate buckets—from must-have items down to your longer-term wish list. But MoSCoW itself doesn’t help you determine which item belongs in which category.

You will need a separate ranking methodology. You can choose from many, such as:

• Weighted scoring
• Value vs. complexity
• Buy-a-feature
• Opportunity scoring

For help finding the best scoring methodology for your team, check out ProductPlan’s article: 7 strategies to choose the best features for your product .

2. Seek input from all key stakeholders.

To make sure you’re placing each initiative into the right bucket—must-have, should-have, could-have, or won’t-have—your team needs context. 

At the beginning of your MoSCoW method, your team should consider which stakeholders can provide valuable context and insights. Sales? Customer success? The executive staff? Product managers in another area of your business? Include them in your initiative scoring process if you think they can help you see opportunities or threats your team might miss. 

3. Share your MoSCoW process across your organization.

MoSCoW gives your team a tangible way to show your organization prioritizing initiatives for your products or projects. 

The method can help you build company-wide consensus for your work, or at least help you show stakeholders why you made the decisions you did.

Communicating your team’s prioritization strategy also helps you set expectations across the business. When they see your methodology for choosing one initiative over another, stakeholders in other departments will understand that your team has thought through and weighed all decisions you’ve made. 

If any stakeholders have an issue with one of your decisions, they will understand that they can’t simply complain—they’ll need to present you with evidence to alter your course of action.  

Related Terms

2×2 prioritization matrix / Eisenhower matrix / DACI decision-making framework / ICE scoring model / RICE scoring model

Prioritizing your roadmap using our guide

Talk to an expert.

Schedule a few minutes with us to share more about your product roadmapping goals and we'll tailor a demo to show you how easy it is to build strategic roadmaps, align behind customer needs, prioritize, and measure success.

Share on Mastodon

Please contact the site administrator

Moscow - City Map PowerPoint Template

City map of Moscow with administrative districts and numerous design examples

Instant Download:

• 100% Editable Powerpoint Slides / Graphics
• Outstanding Customer Support
• SSL Secure Payment
• Made in Germany
• Information
• Template (4:3)

High quality city map "Moscow" for PowerPoint

This detailed citymap of "Moscow" you can present in Microsoft PowerPoint. The vector graphic enables you to easily edit and scale your map as much as you need to. Change the colour and edit the separate districts. The map comes in different design-variations.

Tokyo - City Map

Berlin - city map, los angeles - city map, paris - city map, corporate services.

We’ll optimize your existing PowerPoint presentation and create slides in your corporate design.

New PowerPoint Templates

We are continually bringing you new PowerPoint templates on current business topics and in modern designs.