book review of the prince by machiavelli

The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli, Book Review

Introduction: The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

I read and reviewed The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli which was written over five hundred years ago. And, it always amazes me how some books that are timeless classics are still relevant today. The Prince is one such book. I firmly believe we can use some of yesterday's ideas to solve today's problems if we step back in time and take a look at some of those classics. For those who like videos, I've found some YouTube Videos created by AntiGroupThink, which I have included.

After you read The Prince for yourself, or at the very least watch the five short YouTube videos, ask and answer the following three questions:

• Does the end ever justify the means? And if yes, in what situations?
• How do you get power and how do you keep it?
• Is power the end all and be all?

What is The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli About?

Niccolo Machiavelli worked in politics from 1498 to 1512, but his political career ended in shame, with him being arrested and imprisoned for 22 days. Machiavelli refers to Lorenzo Medici as the Prince. In his forced absence from politics, Machiavelli wrote The Prince hoping that given his republican credentials, he would be re-employed with the Medicis , thus returning to a position of power.

For example, Machiavelli states “A man who is made prince by the favour of the people must work to retain their friendship; and this is easy for him because the people ask only not to be oppressed.

But a man who has become prince against the will of the people and by the favour of the nobles should, before anything else, try to win the people over; this too is easy if he takes them under his protection… it is necessary for a prince to have the friendship of the people; otherwise he has no remedy in times of adversity.”

Machiavelli was nicknamed “Old Nick,” another name for Satan, and the Jesuits called him “the Devil's partner in crime.” While reading The Prince, I was often very shocked because some sections are very dark. However, once you get past that, it is filled with many parallels and contrasts to today. If you dig beneath the surface of what he is saying, the information can be transported to our time and used.

For example,

“As for intellectual training, the prince must read history, studying the actions of eminent men to see how they conducted themselves during war and to discover the reasons for their victories or their defeats, so that he can avoid the latter and imitate the former. Above all, he must read history so that he can do what eminent men have done before him….”

We could make this more relevant to us by interpreting it to mean that we must read history and study the actions of successful men and women to discover the reasons for their successes and failures to imitate their successes.

Machiavelli's political thesis can be summed up as “I also believe that the man who adapts his policy to the times prospers, and likewise that the one whose policy clashes with the demands of the times does not.”

YouTube video of The Prince, Part One of Five. If you cannot view the video click here .

The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli:  Five +2 Great Ideas

• When trouble is sensed well in advance, itcan easily be remedied; if you wait for it to show itself, any medicine will be too late because the disease will have become incurable. This means prevention is better than cure.
• Men willingly change their ruler expecting to fare better. That's why we have political parties.
• When states are acquired in a province differing in language, in customs, and in institutions, then difficulties arise; and to hold them one must be very fortunate and very assiduous. One of the best, most effective expedients would be for the conqueror to go live there in person. This course of action would make a new possession more secure and more permanent.
• Whoever is responsible for another's becoming powerful ruins himself, because this power is brought into being either by ingenuity or by force, and both of these are suspect to the one who has become powerful.
• Governments set up overnight, like everything in nature whose growth is forced, lack strong roots and ramifications. So they are destroyed in the first bad spell.
• A man who becomes a prince with the help of the nobles finds it more difficult to maintain his position than one who does so with the help of the people. As prince, he finds himself surrounded by many who believe they are his equals, and because of that he cannot command or manage them the way he wants
• Prosperity is ephemeral; if a man behaves with patience and circumspection, and the time and circumstances are right, he will prosper, however, if circumstances change and he doesn't adapt his policy to reflect the change, he will be ruined.

Conclusion: The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

I recommend that you read The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli just to see how far, and sometimes not so far, that we've come. After you have read The Prince, what parallels can you make to events occurring in our world today? What are your great ideas?

Books by Niccolo Machiavelli

Part Two of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli YouTube Video

Part Three of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli YouTube Video

Part Four of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli YouTube Video

Part Five of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli YouTube Video

Background Information

Although The Prince was first published in 1532 (after his death), he wrote it in 1513. Machiavelli wrote his timeless classic to regain favor with the Medici family. The prince he refers to in his book, is Lorenzo Medici.

Pope Leo X, born Giovanni di Lorenzo de’ Medici, commissioned Niccolo Machiavelli, in 1519, “to draw up his report on a reform of the state of Florence.” Martin Luther wrote 95 Theses in response to Leo X selling indulgences, so there was a lot going on at once. The point I am trying to make, is that when we are reading the classics, it is good to know what was going on at the time, in the author's external environment.

“In 1517, Luther posted his “95 Theses for an academic debate on indulgences on the door of the castle church at Wittenberg.” The Theses went viral, and in 1518, he was called before Cardinal Cajetan, and commanded to renounce his theses, which he refused. “Here I stand. I can do no other.””

Related Post:  Review of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses

Lectures on Modern European Intellectual History: Niccolo Machiavelli, 1469-1527

Review of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses #theclassics

About the Author  Avil Beckford

Hello there! I am Avil Beckford, the founder of The Invisible Mentor. I am also a published author, writer, expert interviewer host of The One Problem Podcast and MoreReads Success Blueprint, a movement to help participants learn in-demand skills for future jobs. Sign-up for MoreReads: Blueprint to Change the World today! In the meantime, Please support me by buying my e-books Visit My Shop , and thank you for connecting with me on LinkedIn , Facebook , Twitter and Pinterest !

Enjoyed this article?

Find more great content here:

There’s a Hole in My Sidewalk by Portia Nelson, Summary

What does it mean to be relentless, are you relentless, thinking in bets by annie duke, summary.

Book Review of The Prince by Nicolo Machiavelli

This post may contains affiliate links. If you click and buy we may make a commission, at no additional charge to you. Please see our disclosure policy for more details.

Genre : Philosophy Author : Nicolo Machiavelli Title : The Prince

Table of Contents

The Prince is a “how-to” for aspiring rulers. The book disregards republics and hereditary principalities to focus on mixed and new principalities. A mixed principality is one that has previously existed but has been taken over, and a new principality is one that requires a new form of government.

When ruling a mixed principality, Machiavelli highlights the importance of befriending the weak and destroying anyone who may become powerful enough to revolt. To accomplish this, a prince must have tremendous foresight. He needs to recognize problems and evils before they become too visible, and he must swiftly destroy them.

Lords, powerful men, and aides all must be watched carefully. As previously mentioned, anyone who may be powerful or ambitious enough to lead a revolt must be crushed.

In starting a new principality, a prince will have been installed through virtue, fortune, or wickedness. To take power through virtue is to take it through force. A prince must quickly establish himself and lay a strong foundation of leadership.

When a prince takes power through fortune or the work of others, he is in a dangerous position because others may question his power. Therefore, he must quickly instill love and fear into the people.

Machiavelli does not condemn wickedness as a means to power. He instead suggests immoral acts be done quickly and in one stroke. A prince also needs to find ways to make the people always dependent on the state.

The strength of a principality, according to Machiavelli, is measured by its military. A principality should always have a strong military and be able to defend itself. Mercenaries are not to be trusted as their only incentive is money.

Machiavelli does not promote princes to be moral, virtuous people. What is most important, however, is the appearance of greatness. Put simply, he believes nice guys finish last and that princes should act immorally when needed to promote their agenda and maintain power.

Fortune and God are not to be relied upon. A prince should create his own path and be a risk-taker. A prince should not worry about being viewed as mean but should be loved when possible. Cruelty may be necessary to instill the correct amount of fear in the people. Machiavelli closes his book with a discussion of Italian politics and failed rulers.

Introduction

“Upon this, one has to remark that men ought either to be well treated or crushed.”

Written in the early 1500s, The Prince is one of the most discussed and scrutinized books on political philosophy. The book has been highly debated and criticized, but one must acknowledge the tremendous impact the book has had on political thought. The book gave rise to the term Machiavellianism that has ubiquitously been used to describe politicians for centuries.

Machiavelli’s most famous work advises aspiring rulers on how to maintain and exert power, and despite the potential accuracy of the advice, Machiavelli directs rulers to the wrong goal. The definition of success Machiavelli seeks for his readers is power alone, but instead the true goal Machiavelli should have promoted is leading and truly serving people.

The Prince is structured as a “how-to” guide for rulers of principalities. Machiavelli disregards the republic form of a government and focuses solely on principalities.

Each chapter discusses a different aspect of th e ruling , ranging from acquiring a principality, to maintaining it, to whether it is better to be loved or feared. In this brief, I will first summarize the book and Machiavelli’s messages, and then I will provide my own commentary and analysis.

On Mixed Principalities

Machiavelli quickly dismisses hereditary principalities, for they require little effort to maintain. He delves into the “mixed principality,” one that has existed for some time but has been acquired by a new prince. He highlights the importance of befriending the weak and “crushing” anyone who could possibly injure the ruler.

The goodwill of the natives is imperative, and Machiavelli recommends avoiding attempting to overtake provinces that have different languages and cultures. These provinces are more difficult to win over, and the people may revolt. Instead, one should colonize these areas and defend them against strong foreign invaders.

By defending the weaker colonies, the prince is able to win the affections of the locals, and he prevents foreign countries from gaining too large a kingdom.

The Prince also highlights the importance of foresight on the part of a ruler.

A prince must be able to quickly recognize any uprisings or factions within his kingdom that have the potential to revolt. If the “evil” goes unrecognized until the problem becomes public, it will be too late because more people may join in the uprising. Therefore, a problem must be destroyed before it gains any traction with the common people.

Machiavelli asserts that those who aid others to power cannot be trusted because they either have brought about the power through “astuteness or else by force.”

If a prince is aided by others, he should seek to destroy those aides because they have the capability of creating power that could challenge the prince’s rule. A prince should also never aid others to power as those he has aided will destroy him for the same reasons.

A prince will face difficulty maintaining rule in a state that has many lords or other powerful men. These states may be easy to initially conquer because one only needs to identify one or two powerful discontent leaders to aid in the overthrow.

However, for the reasons mentioned previously, this can prove to be risky as the leaders who have aided the new ruler may easily start movements of their own to take over the state. Machiavelli contrasts these states with those that have a supreme ruler.

The supreme ruler chooses his aides and can easily remove them. These states are more difficult to conquer as the aides to the current ruler are more loyal. However, these states are easier to maintain because once conquered, the prince can install his own system of aides and servants.

The last aspect of mixed principalities Machiavelli discusses is governing principalities that previously had been free with their own laws and statutes before being acquired.

These states are accustomed to freedom and autonomy and may not take too kindly to losing that freedom. Machiavelli describes three options: destroying the city/state, living in the conquered area to watch it closely, or letting the principality continue under its current rule and installing an oligarchical government to remain friendly to the new ruler.

Previously free cities or principalities are very difficult to maintain though. Those who are not used to being ruled do not easily accept a prince and are more likely to revolt. Accordingly, Machiavelli suggests destruction or close rule may be the best option.

On New Principalities

After concluding his discussion of mixed principalities, Machiavelli offers his advice on ruling completely new principalities. A new principality is one that requires a completely new government and is uniting people under one rule that previously had not been united. He first distinguishes between those who have become rulers through “virtue” or by fortune.

To Machiavelli, virtue is defined as the ability and drive to conquer, so those that have become rulers through virtue have generally done so through conquering and defeating others.

These princes must install new forms of government and forcefully defend the new ways because some will be upset about the change, and the others will only demonstrate “lukewarm” support. To ensure there is no challenge to the prince’s rule, he must take up arms and rule by force.

Machiavelli also discusses those who have become rulers of principalities by fortune or by the force of others.

This is a dangerous position for a prince as he will not have proven himself to be worthy of his powerful role, and he may be dependent on someone else for his newly found power. The key is to quickly establish power and instill fear and love in the subjects. They should love the prince to remain loyal but fear him enough that they never seek their own power.

The next form of rule discussed is the prince that takes power through some of form of wicked or immoral act, such as murdering a political adversary. Controversially, Machiavelli does not condemn immoral acts but finds justification for them.

He claims evilness need only be swift and “necessary.” He recommends a prince should “examine closely into all those injuries which it is necessary for him to inflict and to do them in one stroke so as to not have to repeat them daily.”

A prince can also come to rule through a civil manner such as through the will of the people or the nobles of the principality.

As previously stated, Machiavelli is particularly wary of nobles or anyone with power. He warns that an ambitious noble should be watched as an enemy. On the contrary, those nobles with little courage or those that bind themselves to the prince should be praised and used. If the prince comes to power through the will of the people, the prince is dependent on the goodwill of the people.

Machiavelli advises strongly against ever being dependent on others for power for those that give power can just as easily take it away. Instead, Machiavelli suggests a prince needs “adopt such a course that his citizens will always in every sort and kind of circumstance have need of the state and him.” If the people are dependent on him and not the other way around, the people will remain faithful.

On the Strength of a Principality

Machiavelli asserts that strength is measured by force. A strong principality would have such good defenses that they would never be tested and would not need any support from allies. The military should be far-reaching and powerful, and the people should be of high spirit to ensure they have no reason to revolt.

On Military

Mercenaries are not to be trusted, according to Machiavelli. Because their incentive is money instead of serving the principality, they will not be adequate soldiers. Machiavelli blamed many of Italy’s problems on an overreliance on hired foreign soldiers.

A strong state needs its own soldiers that will defend it vehemently.

Beyond maintaining a strong and loyal military, “a prince ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select anything else for his study, than war and its rules and discipline.” It is through battle and force that a prince shows his power. The prince must know his land well and be well- prepared to handle any attack, and he should study and imitate great military men.

On Virtues and Reputation

Machiavelli speaks to some of the ideal qualities of a prince including sincerity, bravery, and generosity, but ultimately concludes these are not completely necessary to the prince, “for a man who wishes to act entirely up to his professions of virtue soon meets with what destroys him among so much that is evil.”

Essentially, there is too much evil in the world for the prince to always be as virtuous as he may claim to be. “Hence, it is necessary for a prince wishing to hold his own to know how to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to necessity.” Ideally, a prince would be virtuous and moral, but when deciding between morality and selfish desires, Machiavelli recommends selfish desires.

On reputation, Machiavelli advises the prince not to fear being viewed as mean. Being too liberal can lead to economic problems and dislike from the people as he takes from the powerful and gives to the powerless. Liberality can lead to hatred while meanness only leads to fear.

When deciding between being clement (merciful) or cruel, Machiavelli asserts that mercy is preferred but too much of it can lead to disorder.

A prince, therefore, should not fear cruelty such as executing a criminal. A prince also faces the dilemma of whether he should be feared or loved. It easier to unite men when they are fearful, but they are less likely to revolt against a beloved prince.

A prince then needs to strike the balance between the two. He should attempt to be loved and at the very least, avoid hatred, for hatred can lead to revolt. A prince may be required to commit cruel acts in order to inspire fear, but this is necessary to maintain order. Above all else, the prince needs control.

In regard to faith and image, Machiavelli does not shy away from his stance that true morality is not necessary. He argues that maintaining true faith and acting is truly merciful and generous ways will cause harm to the prince. However, what is truly important is the appearance of faith and morality.

This appearance can be quite beneficial and easy to achieve as “he who seeks to deceive will always find someone who allows himself to be deceived.” Once many have allowed themselves to be deceived, the prince is safe because “everyone sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose the opinion of the many.” In other words, once a reputation has been established, no one will dare challenge it, even if they know the truth.

On How a Prince Should Act

As previously mentioned, a prince should seek the image of a great man and avoid hatred. In foreign affairs, a prince should either be a “true friend or a downright enemy.” It is better to make it known where one stands on an issue than to be mistrusted as a doubtful friend to everyone.

The prince should also encourage his people to engage in peaceful agriculture and commerce and avoid causing fear of high taxes. Additionally, “he ought to entertain the people with festivals and spectacles.”

A prince needs counsel and advisors.

However, the prince should be in complete control of both who his advisors are and what type of counsel they offer. Advisors should be loyal servants and watched closely for any type of behavior that indicates selfish motives or ambition.

The prince also needs to be wary of flattery. He should invite his trusted counselors to speak truthfully because flattery may weaken the prince’s ability to foresee potential enemies.

Machiavelli also advises princes to control their own fates and not leave anything up to fortune or God. A prince should be adventurous and risk-taking because “fortune is a woman… and it is seen that she allows herself to be mastered by the adventurous…She is, therefore, always, woman-like, and a lover of young men, because they are less cautious.” According to Machiavelli, a prince can create his own successful path instead of waiting for good fortune or for God to create a path.

Machiavelli closes The Prince with a description of the failures of past Italian rulers. He blames their failure to adhere to the rules he has laid out, and he implores the then-current Pope to take over Italy using Machiavellian methods.

Parallels to Modern Society

The Prince recommends and, in many ways, celebrates immoral behavior. This in itself is upsetting and controversial, but what is truly disappointing is the obvious parallels between the behavior Machiavelli recommends and the behavior we see in some of the people who run our country.

Machiavelli may be responsible for the term Machiavellianism, but the underlying behavior would exist without him. As Machiavelli himself notes, the desire to conquer and rule has been innate in man for hundreds of years. Machiavelli just recognizes and celebrates that desire.

The dark side of politics reveals itself when elected officials adopt Machiavellian attitudes about morality and do what is “necessary” to stay in office.

Bill Clinton lied to the people about his immoral acts to try to preserve his position of power. Richard Nixon attempted to cover up the illegal activities of the Republican Party during the 1972 presidential election. These are just two of the most public immoral activities of American politicians; many more immoral acts have possibly been committed that everyday people like myself know nothing about.

I do not believe that Presidents Clinton or Nixon were truly bad or immoral people, and they could have entered politics for the right reason; but at some point, both of them compromised their morals in order to maintain power. They decided that the ends justified the means.

Machiavelli strongly believed in the importance of maintaining the image of a great man.

Politicians today seem to also place great importance on the image . In the 2012 presidential election, over one billion dollars was spent on advertising (The Washington Post). Quite commonly, we would see ads focused on portraying political adversaries as out of touch or generally just bad people.

Politicians would not spend so much on attacking others’ reputations if they did not believe that image is vital. They are trying to create a positive image of themselves or at least an image that is better than their opponents. Due to the numerous public political scandals we have seen, I am doubtful that all politicians are as virtuous as they would have us believe.

Machiavelli stresses the importance of keeping elders and lords happy. While we do not have elders or lords in this country, we do have very wealthy campaign contributors. Individual contributions to campaigns may be capped at $2,500, but corporations, unions, and wealthy individuals can donate millions to Super PACs.

Politicians are dependent on campaign contributions to win elections, so the incentive is there to keep special interests happy to keep the donations coming.

Machiavelli also advises princes to keep the people dependent on the state.

There are multiple sides to this argument, but one could argue that the American leaders have attempted to make the people more dependent on the state. We have seen an enormous increase in government reach through programs such as Social Security and Obamacare, and the cynic could argue that these entitlement programs are designed to win the goodwill and votes of the people. Whether this expansion of government is a good thing or not can be argued, but the expansion exists nonetheless.

Machiavelli’s Moral Position

Machiavelli promotes a selfish and consequential view of morality. The ends can always be used to justify the means. He argues that nice guys finish last and that maintaining true virtue and honor will not lead to power. I strongly disagree with Machiavelli’s stance.

I do not believe we are very good judges of what means are justified by what ends. When adopting a consequential view, it is far too easy to start justifying all means and losing all touch with principles and virtues.

Machiavelli may be correct that maintaining virtues and principles may not always lead to power or material reward, but his view is too short-sighted. I would ask what use is power if you’ve had to sell your soul to get it.

I believe we will be much happier and more fulfilled in the long run if we maintain our morality. A guilt-free conscience is worth much more than power.

Accepted Machiavellian Norms

Despite my overall objections and disgust with the tactics suggested by the book, I must acknowledge that some of Machiavelli’s ideas are fundamental to the way our country runs. Machiavelli is credited as creating the political philosophy of realism.

He noted that “how one lives is so far distant from how one ought to live, that he who neglects what is done for what ought to be done, sooner effects his ruin other than his preservation.” While on a personal level, I disagree with this moral standpoint and do believe we should focus on what ought to be done, realism is an accepted part of how governments run.

We expect our government to make tough moral decisions that sometimes involve consequential thinking.

Dropping an atomic bomb that can kill thousands and cause vast destruction would be nearly impossible to justify using any other moral standpoint other than realism. Traditional philosophical and Christian thought would never support a decision to kill thousands in wars.

Killing is never what ought to be done by traditional moral frameworks. But the fact remains, we justify war and killing with the ends it creates: safety and world order. Ideally, this would not be the case, but Machiavelli recognized that we do not live in an ideal world.

Machiavelli also wrote of the importance of a strong military. The U.S. follows this idea to a great extent. We spend more on our military than any country in the world, and our position as a superpower can largely be attributed to our military successes. As T. Boone Pickens noted in a TED Talk last year, we rely on our military to protect oil and trade routes around the world. Machiavelli would praise our military policy.

What We Can Learn from Machiavelli

There are some positive lessons to be learned from The Prince. Machiavelli insisted leaders should take strong stances on issues. This may not always be the best option, but I believe there is value in not being too mercurial in one’s views. It is impossible to please everyone, and Machiavelli recognized this.

We can all benefit from not always trying to be people-pleasers and making tough decisions. We often see politicians try desperately to cater to every movement in public opinion, and they end up losing credibility as people do not believe the candidate’s campaign promises will ever actually be fulfilled.

This was one of the biggest criticisms of John Kerry in the 2004 election; in fact, “Kerry’s Top Ten Flip-Flops” is the fourth result on Google for the search “ flip-flopper.” Machiavelli knew a strong leader needed to be comfortable being the bad guy if it meant a greater goal would be achieved. He just had the wrong goals in mind.

The business person could learn some lessons from Machiavelli.

A merger could be paralleled with a new principality and an acquisition with a mixed principality. During a merger, the leader needs to quickly establish a foundation and culture, as Machiavelli recommends. Acquiring a new company could cause some of the same problems for a leader that Machiavelli speaks of when acquiring an existing principality.

The employees of the acquired company will have been used to their own standards and operating procedures, and they may be tepid about the new management. In this instance, it may be smart for the acquirer to follow Machiavelli’s advice of putting in a lot of face-time with the new employees. This way, he/she could effectively communicate new policies and goals, and the leader could also gain a better understanding of the morale and values of the new employees.

The Wrong Definition of Success

The Prince describes success simply as power, but power has no goal other than itself. As George Orwell noted in 1984 , “power is not a means; it is an end.” Machiavelli does not promote the use of power for good. He makes power the ultimate end. I believe this is the wrong end.

Instead of seeking power for power’s sake, politicians and leaders should seek to serve the people well. Machiavelli’s only concern for the people is maintaining their happiness in order to keep power. I argue that societies will be much better off if we have leaders that enter politics in order to enact positive change and not to serve their own ends.

To contrast Machiavelli, look to George Washington. George Washington did not seek the presidency. In fact, some say he actively avoided it. He did not look at the presidency as an avenue to power but instead, as a tremendous responsibility. The people wanted him though (he received 100% of the electoral votes), and he believed the government should represent the people.

Washington was a great leader as president. However, the most significant act of his presidency may have been his decision to step down, a decision that would utterly perplex Machiavelli. There were no term limits at the time, but Washington voluntarily stepped down after two terms. He did not want to form another monarchy.

The presidency does not exist to boost the power of an individual; it exists to represent and serve the people, and Washington knew one man could not continually be that representative and servant (CATO Institute “The Man Who Would Not Be King”). George Washington did not follow Machiavellian principles, but he still, in many ways, shaped what has become the most powerful country in the world.

In the business world, it would be best to avoid Machiavellian thinking.

I strongly feel that those who are strictly seeking power and advancement are quickly and easily weeded out of organizations. Instead, we would be better off seeking to produce quality work, and the promotions will come in due time. As previously asserted, Machiavelli’s view is too short-term.

A worker who adopts Machiavellian tactics may be able to achieve a few short-term successes, but the worker who maintains morality and virtue will be much happier and successful in the long-run. If there is a company that rewards Machiavellian behavior, it is probably not a company a decent person would want to work at. Even if there is no material reward for virtue, the moral person will still maintain their conscience, and that is invaluable.

The Prince and Titans

The ideals and lessons written by Machiavelli contradict almost everything about morality and ethics we have learned as Aggies and as Titans. We do not learn that Aggies do not lie, cheat, or steal, unless they have a really good reason. We are expected to maintain our principles, even in the most trying of times.

In Titans, Britt Harris has not taught us to seek power and material reward. Instead, he promotes “vision, courage, honesty, and concern for others” (Titans Handbook). These ideals differ greatly from those espoused by Machiavelli. Controlling others will never lead to the happiness or fulfillment that morality and kindness will bring.

Britt always taught us Titans that Wisdom is Cheap , and the principal can find treasure troves of the good stuff in books. We hope only will also express their thanks to the Titans if the book review brought wisdom into their lives.

This post has been slightly edited to promote search engine accessibility.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Big Book Review

Read More, Discover More – Uncover Your Next Great Book

The Prince Book Review

With its controversial reputation and timeless wisdom, The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli remains a must-read for anyone interested in politics, leadership, or human nature. This classic book offers insightful and often disturbing advice on how to gain and maintain power, making it a captivating yet dangerous read. Whether you agree or disagree with Machiavelli’s tactics, The Prince sparks thought-provoking conversations and challenges readers to consider the complexities of leadership and morality.

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways:

• Machiavellian principles: The book introduces controversial ideas about leadership and power, commonly associated with the term “Machiavellianism,” emphasizing the ends justifying the means.
• Realpolitik: “The Prince” discusses the importance of political realism, focusing on practicality over idealism in governance and decision-making.
• Timeless relevance: Despite being written in the 16th century, the book’s lessons on power, leadership, and manipulation remain pertinent in modern politics and business.

The Core Ideas of “The Prince”

Power and how to maintain it.

Core to Machiavelli’s “The Prince” is the idea that power must be maintained at all costs. He emphasizes that it is better to be feared than loved, as fear ensures control. Strategies such as manipulation, deception, and even cruelty are justified in the pursuit of power retention.

The Morality of Ruling

Ideas about morality in “The Prince” are complex. Machiavelli argues that rulers must prioritize the stability and success of their state above all else, even if it means acting in ways that may be deemed immoral by traditional standards. He challenges the notion that rulers should always uphold virtues like kindness and honesty, suggesting that sometimes taking ruthless actions can be necessary for the greater good.

Machiavelli’s Worldview

The role of fortuna.

While exploring Machiavelli’s worldview in “The Prince,” it becomes apparent that the concept of Fortuna, or fortune, plays a significant role. One can see that Machiavelli believed that rulers should be adaptable to the unpredictable nature of Fortuna, as it can bring both opportunities and challenges.

The Nature of People

When delving into Machiavelli’s thoughts on the nature of people, Machiavelli argues that individuals are fundamentally self-interested and will act in their own self-preservation. This can lead to a cynical view of human behavior, where people are seen as seeking power and advantage in all aspects of life.

Understanding Machiavelli’s view on the nature of people is crucial in interpreting his political theories. While some may find these ideas bleak, they highlight the importance of being aware of the potential for deceit and manipulation in leadership and decision-making.

The Prince Book Review: Dive Into Your Next Adventure

Criticism and Controversy

“the prince” through history.

History has viewed Machiavelli’s “The Prince” with a mix of awe and disgust. When it was first published in 1532, it caused an uproar for its bold and pragmatic approach to ruling. Over time, it has been both praised for its honesty about power dynamics and criticized for its amoral stance on leadership.

Modern Perspectives on Machiavelli

On a modern canvas, Machiavelli’s work continues to spark debate. Some view it as a timeless guide to navigating the complexities of leadership, while others condemn it as a manual for tyranny. The book’s enduring popularity shows that its influence reaches far beyond its original context.

Plus , while “The Prince” may be controversial, it offers valuable insights into the intricate dance of politics and power. Machiavelli’s blunt analysis of human nature and the ruthless tactics he suggests have provided a roadmap for leaders throughout history. Love it or hate it, this book remains a powerful voice in the discussion of governance.

Reflections on “The Prince”

Personal takeaways.

All of us have a bit of a political animal inside us, and Machiavelli’s “The Prince” can bring out the strategist in anyone. An analysis of power, leadership, and governance, this timeless piece offers insights that can be applied not just in politics, but in various aspects of life. Machiavelli’s bold and pragmatic approach to discussing human nature and power dynamics leaves readers with much to ponder.

The Relevance of “The Prince” in Modern Politics

On the surface, “The Prince” may seem like a relic of the past, but its teachings continue to resonate in modern politics. In today’s cutthroat political landscape, Machiavelli’s lessons on seizing and maintaining power can still be seen in the actions of various leaders around the world. Strategies such as manipulation, cunning, and the prioritization of self-interest are all too familiar in contemporary governance.

For instance, the use of propaganda and misinformation to sway public opinion, the manipulation of alliances for personal gain, and the disregard for ethical considerations in decision-making are some of the dangerous realities that Machiavelli’s work sheds light on in today’s political realm .

Final Thoughts

Summarizing machiavelli.

For those who have investigated into the pages of “The Prince” by Machiavelli, it becomes evident that the author’s pragmatic and ruthless approach to politics is both intriguing and controversial. Machiavelli’s teachings on power, leadership, and the inherent nature of mankind are presented with a stark clarity that leaves readers both shocked and in awe. Despite the morally questionable tactics advocated by Machiavelli, his insights into the complexities of human behavior remain relevant in today’s political landscape.

The Enduring Legacy of “The Prince”

With the publication of “The Prince” over five centuries ago, Machiavelli inadvertently set the stage for a new understanding of political theory and governance. The impact of his work has transcended time and continues to be studied and debated by scholars, politicians, and leaders worldwide. Its influence can be seen in various spheres, from business strategies to military tactics, making it a timeless guide for those hungry for power.

Enduring the test of time, “The Prince” has earned a reputation as a controversial yet indispensable text for anyone interested in the intricate dynamics of leadership and control. Despite its dark themes and seemingly ruthless advice, Machiavelli’s work remains a cornerstone in political philosophy, offering valuable lessons on cunning, manipulation, and the pursuit of power.

Q: What is ‘The Prince’ book about?

A: ‘The Prince’ is a political treatise by Niccolò Machiavelli that offers advice to future rulers on how to maintain power and control. It explores themes such as leadership, morality, and the manipulation of power.

Q: Is ‘The Prince’ a difficult book to read?

A: While ‘The Prince’ can be challenging due to its dense political theories and historical context, it is considered a classic work of literature and worth the effort for those interested in politics and leadership.

Q: What can readers learn from ‘The Prince’?

A: Readers of ‘The Prince’ can gain insights into the nature of power, the importance of strategy and adaptability in leadership, and the complexities of human behavior in political contexts. It encourages readers to think critically about governance and ethics.

The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli Essay (Book Review)

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Imperativeness of the book and its theme, the book’s ideals and key concerns or areas, discussions.

This paper presents a detailed review of an interesting book titled “The Prince” that convey vital principalities of leadership. The book was a masterpiece work of an Italian who was a renowned historian, and a diplomat called Niccolo Machiavelli. The writer was also known as a strong politician who had noble political ideals and theories.

Despite developing his writing skills from a humble background, his insightful narratives have been instrumental in transforming individual’s social and political lifestyle. This explains why the book that has been branded as a traditional peace of work by critics due to its “mirrors of prince style” remains one of the innovative political narrations of the day.

Indeed, the information contained in the book has been instrumental in transforming political activities in various settings. It has been helpful in inculcating noble ruling guidelines and principles among leaders.

It adopted a political theme with an aim of enhancing leadership by fostering democracy and understanding through integration of effective ruling principalities (Machiavelli, 2004). The author focuses on the theme due to the unfair experiences and treatment that he was facing because of bad governance and oppressive rule.

The book focuses on leadership ideals and effective principalities that shape good governance or political practice. Its aim is to convey credible information about political issues and the role of leaders in the development of cohesive societies (Landon, 2005). Machiavelli opens his narration or political observation by stating that all forms of dominion in various jurisdictions are republics or principalities.

He asserted that, any leader who seeks to exercise good leadership should adopt noble principalities (Machiavelli, Skinner & Price, 1988). Such leaders should ensure that the set rules that guide operations in their territories are favorable and acceptable. That is the rules should be ideological, socially relevant and economically viable. In the book, the author’s concern is seen to be exclusively with principalities.

He noted that ethical ruling principalities are the primary virtues that leaders are under obligation to practice or adopt especially in the current environment. He innovatively concentrated on the best techniques of governance and holding up to the noble principalities in the first eleven chapters of the book (Machiavelli, 2004). This shows how individuals can achieve greatness in their respective areas of operation.

Imperatively, the author provided educative information that seeks to foster unity and excellent leadership. He distinguishes the three types of principalities in the first eleven chapters. He also analyzed the best techniques of acquiring the principalities and the process of achieving their absolute maintenance.

Firstly, he considers hereditary principality that pose minimal difficulties in various settings. Marriott (2012) noted that hereditary principalities are consistent ruling ideals that “princes” or territory leaders acquire through experiences, historical studies and predecessors.

Secondly, he considers mixed cases that explain the process through which rulers’ annexes new possessions in their territories. He asserted that this is where key issues that threaten political integration begin. This is because the annexing process leads to unfair acquisition or expansion of territorial setting by some leaders.

This happens especially in territories whose leaders lack democratic ideals and regard for other peoples basic rights (Machiavelli & Rebhorn, 2003). In this regard, the author insists that leaders or rulers should hold and practice complete composite principalities. This is essential in ensuring that they foster peaceful coexistence and political stability. It is also vital in ensuring that they exercise total political control in their territories.

Other chapters of the book focus on the procedures of acquiring new principalities and its consequences. The chapters state that individuals can acquire new principalities or control ideals by their own arms, ability or good lack.

They also convey essential information on the consequences of obtaining leadership principalities through wickedness. This is why the author emphasizes on the need for civilization and adoption of civil principalities (Landon, 2005)

Notably, leaders should get full acquaintance with the way one can measure ruling principalities and potential leadership ideals. The measurement guidelines are crucial in providing them with a viable benchmark through which they can gage their performance. It is also significant to ensure that their actions are executed with good intentions to boost social and economic integration.

In addition, the author affirmed that ruling principalities affect human affairs and productivity. They influence communication and understanding between individuals especially leaders and the public.

This hinders progress since inferior operating principles impede sharing of ideas and development of innovative concepts through teamwork (Marriott, 2012). Lack of noble principles in leadership also compromises liberty and execution of activities under democratic guidelines.

Indeed, the book provides insightful information that has been significant in shaping individuals perception on the significance of good leadership in our societies. It gives essential leadership principalities that leaders should adopt to foster unity among locals where democratic ideals have been cited. It also recognizes that rulers should exercise composite guiding principles within their territories.

Machiavelli, N. (2004). The prince: And, the art of war . London: Collector’s Library.

Machiavelli, N., Skinner, Q., & Price, R. (1988). Machiavelli: The prince . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Machiavelli, N., & Rebhorn, W. A. (2003). The prince and other writings . New York: Barnes & Noble Classics.

Marriott, K. (2013). The Prince . Web.

Landon, W. J. (2005). Politics, patriotism and language: Niccolò Machiavelli’s “secular patria” and the creation of an Italian national identity . New York.

• Niccolo Machiavelli’s Philosophy
• Niccolo Machiavelli Views on Political Decisions
• Niccolo Machiavelli: Events Determination by Fortune
• Doctor Faustus as a Tragic Hero Essay
• Voltaire: "Candide" Conclusion
• The Death of Ivan Ilyich by Leo Tolstoy
• Deception Role in "The Odyssey" by Homer
• Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy and Improvement in Society
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, April 16). The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-prince-by-niccolo-machiavelli/

"The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli." IvyPanda , 16 Apr. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/the-prince-by-niccolo-machiavelli/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli'. 16 April.

IvyPanda . 2019. "The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli." April 16, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-prince-by-niccolo-machiavelli/.

1. IvyPanda . "The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli." April 16, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-prince-by-niccolo-machiavelli/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli." April 16, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-prince-by-niccolo-machiavelli/.

Niccolò Machiavelli

Ask litcharts ai: the answer to your questions.

In The Prince Niccolò Machiavelli shrewdly outlines the strategies that a ruler must follow to maintain his position and govern his state. With a clear and direct authorial voice, Machiavelli employs ancient and contemporary examples to illustrate the pragmatic tactics of successful leaders. Dedicating his book to the Florentine ruler Lorenzo dé Medici , Machiavelli draws heavily on his own political experience to support his exceedingly realistic views on human nature and the techniques of able rulers. Contradicting conventional morality, Machiavelli advises wise princes to use violence and cunning to safeguard their states. The Prince explores the careful balance between contrasts, comparing virtue and vice, prowess and fortune, and subjects and rulers.

At the start of the treatise Machiavelli asks Lorenzo to accept The Prince as a "token of my devotion," stating that his "long acquaintance" with political affairs and "continuous study of the ancient world " inform his writing. In the first chapters Machiavelli outlines the scope of The Prince , declaring his focus on the various types of princes and principalities. Arguing that new principalities pose greater difficulties than hereditary states, Machiavelli segues into a discussion of composite principalities, in which new states form an "appendage to an old state." Within this context, Machiavelli raises the guiding principals of The Prince , encouraging rulers to cultivate the "goodwill" of the people and to study the art of warfare. Machiavelli urges princes to approach political disorders like " a wasting disease ," taking care to diagnose and treat them quickly and resolutely.

Citing Cyrus and Romulus , Machiavelli turns to a discussion of prowess, imploring "prudent" rulers to follow the examples of "great men." Machiavelli writes that men who become rulers by prowess "gain their principalities with difficulty but hold them with ease." Conversely, those who gain power through fortune become rulers easily but maintain their position "only by considerable exertion." Naming Cesare Borgia as a contemporary ruler who gained his status through fortune, Machiavelli praises the "strong foundations" that Borgia laid for his future but laments "the extraordinary and inordinate malice of fortune" that eventually ruined the unlucky duke.

Machiavelli declares that every stable state shares the same foundations, "good laws and good arms." However, Machiavelli places an emphasis on good arms, explaining that good laws "inevitably follow" from military might. Machiavelli warns rulers to avoid the use of mercenary and auxiliary troops, on which he blames "the present ruin of Italy" and the earlier downfall of the Roman Empire. According to Machiavelli, "The first way to lose your state is to neglect the art of war," and he encourages princes to study warfare in peacetime so that they may "reap the profit in times of adversity."

While laying out his guidelines for a prince's moral conduct, Machiavelli blurs the traditional border between virtue and vice. Machiavelli argues that a prince must adhere to a unique standard of morality, often acting "in defiance of good faith, of charity, of kindness, [and] of religion" in order to safeguard his state. The challenges of governance require rulers to reverse the general relationship between virtues and vices, although Machiavelli encourages clever princes to maintain the appearance of virtue. On the question of "whether it is better to be loved than feared," Machiavelli asserts that it is preferable to be feared if the prince cannot "be both the one and the other." Above all else, a prince must "escape being hated" by his people, which he can accomplish if he does not rob his subjects of their property. Machiavelli urges rulers to maintain a "flexible disposition," mimicking the behavior of the fox and the lion to secure their position.

Addressing the distinction between prowess and fortune, Machiavelli contends that fortune controls half of human affairs, leaving the other half to free will. Machiavelli advises princes to "take precautions" against the "malice of fortune," using prowess to prepare for unpredictability. Turning to contemporary Italy, Machiavelli blames the weakness of its states on the political shortcomings of its rulers. Machiavelli concludes by imploring Lorenzo to use the lessons of The Prince to unify war-torn Italy and thus reclaim the grandeur of Ancient Rome.

• Politics & Social Sciences
• Politics & Government

Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime Try Prime and start saving today with fast, free delivery

Amazon Prime includes:

Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.

• Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
• Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
• Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
• A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
• Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
• Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access

Important:  Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.

Buy new: .savingPriceOverride { color:#CC0C39!important; font-weight: 300!important; } .reinventMobileHeaderPrice { font-weight: 400; } #apex_offerDisplay_mobile_feature_div .reinventPriceSavingsPercentageMargin, #apex_offerDisplay_mobile_feature_div .reinventPricePriceToPayMargin { margin-right: 4px; } $6.99 $ 6 . 99 FREE delivery Tuesday, June 11 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35 Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com

Return this item for free.

Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges

• Go to your orders and start the return
• Select your preferred free shipping option
• Drop off and leave!

Save with Used - Good .savingPriceOverride { color:#CC0C39!important; font-weight: 300!important; } .reinventMobileHeaderPrice { font-weight: 400; } #apex_offerDisplay_mobile_feature_div .reinventPriceSavingsPercentageMargin, #apex_offerDisplay_mobile_feature_div .reinventPricePriceToPayMargin { margin-right: 4px; } $6.55 $ 6 . 55 FREE delivery Wednesday, June 12 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35 Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the authors

The Prince Paperback – October 29, 2014

Purchase options and add-ons.

• Print length 170 pages
• Language English
• Publication date October 29, 2014
• Dimensions 6 x 0.39 x 9 inches
• ISBN-10 1503017826
• ISBN-13 978-1503017825
• See all details

Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly

Editorial Reviews

About the author.

Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) was an Italian Renaissance philosopher, politician, military strategist, poet, playwright, and historian. However, Macchiavelli is most well-known for his politics, as he is often cited as the father of modern political theory. His works even inspired the term "Macchiavellian," which today is used to describe cunning or deceitful actions in the field of politics.

Product details

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (October 29, 2014)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 170 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1503017826
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1503017825
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 9.6 ounces
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.39 x 9 inches
• #11,201 in Politics & Government (Books)

About the authors

Niccolò machiavelli.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Niccolo Machiavelli

Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) was a Florentine statesman who was later forced out of public life. He then devoted himself to studying and writing political philosophy, history, fiction, and drama.

Maisha Books

General Press

General Press publishes high-quality POD books in almost all popular genres including Fiction, Nonfiction, Religion, Self-Help, Romance, Classics, etc.

Customer reviews

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Reviews with images

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• Amazon Newsletter
• About Amazon
• Accessibility
• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Supply to Amazon
• Protect & Build Your Brand
• Become an Affiliate
• Become a Delivery Driver
• Start a Package Delivery Business
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Become an Amazon Hub Partner
• › See More Ways to Make Money
• Amazon Visa
• Amazon Store Card
• Amazon Secured Card
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Credit Card Marketplace
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Amazon Prime
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the authors

The Prince by Niccol� Machiavelli - A Timeless Classic of Political Theory | Political Philosophy | Leadership Principles | Machiavellian Philosophy | Masterful Exploration of Power and Politics | Statecraft | Political Strategy | Historical Treatise [Paperback] Niccol� Machiavelli Paperback – 1 August 2015

Save extra with 2 offers.

• Free Delivery

10 days Replacement

• Amazon Delivered
• Pay on Delivery
• Secure transaction

Replacement Instructions

Purchase options and add-ons

• Engage with Machiavelli's pragmatic analysis of political power.
• Delve into the principles of effective leadership and statecraft.
• Reflect on Machiavelli's bold and controversial advice to rulers.
• Explore the timeless themes of ambition, morality, and the pursuit of power.
• This edition presents Machiavelli's enduring work in a clear and accessible translation, making it a valuable resource for students, scholars, and anyone interested in the study of politics and leadership.
• Print length 184 pages
• Language English
• Dimensions 22 x 15 x 2.5 cm
• Publisher Fingerprint! Publishing
• Publication date 1 August 2015
• ISBN-10 9391464599
• ISBN-13 978-9391464592
• See all details

Frequently bought together

Popular titles by this author

Product description

About the author, product details.

• ASIN ‏ : ‎ 8175993073
• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Fingerprint! Publishing; Latest edition (1 August 2015); Prakash Books India Pvt Ltd, 113A, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002, +9111-23265358
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 184 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 9391464599
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-9391464592
• Reading age ‏ : ‎ Customer suggested age: 17 years and up
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 174 g
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 22 x 15 x 2.5 cm
• Country of Origin ‏ : ‎ India
• Net Quantity ‏ : ‎ 1 count
• Importer ‏ : ‎ Prakash Books India Pvt Ltd
• Packer ‏ : ‎ Prakash Books India Pvt Ltd
• #9 in History of Ideas
• #63 in Historical Fiction (Books)
• #149 in Society & Social Sciences

About the authors

Niccolò machiavelli.

Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) was a Florentine statesman who was later forced out of public life. He then devoted himself to studying and writing political philosophy, history, fiction, and drama.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Maisha Books

General Press

General Press publishes high-quality POD books in almost all popular genres including Fiction, Nonfiction, Religion, Self-Help, Romance, Classics, etc.

Niccolo Machiavelli

Customer reviews

Reviews with images.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from India

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• Press Releases
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell under Amazon Accelerator
• Protect and Build Your Brand
• Amazon Global Selling
• Become an Affiliate
• Fulfilment by Amazon
• Advertise Your Products
• Amazon Pay on Merchants
• COVID-19 and Amazon
• Your Account
• Returns Centre
• 100% Purchase Protection
• Amazon App Download
• Conditions of Use & Sale
• Privacy Notice
• Interest-Based Ads

Advanced Search Browse

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

By: martin coyle.

Sign Up Now! Already a Member? Log In You must be logged into UK education collection to access this title. Learn about membership options , or view our freely available titles .

Book Details

Other books.

• by Martin Coyle
• in Nonfiction
• in Literature and Fiction
• in Philosophy
• in Politics and Government

Book Quality

• See open book quality issues