Professional Learning through an Action Research Thesis
Cite this chapter.
- Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt &
- Margaret Fletcher
364 Accesses
The purpose of this chapter is to identify the quality characteristics of an action research thesis, compared to traditional research thesis writing, by drawing on the literature and our experience with supervising and examining action research theses. We identify key problem areas in the literature and suggest effective strategies for meeting these challenges and avoiding pitfalls through reflective practice and questioning insight. We include sets of crucial questions for higher degree students to address through critical reflection on their action research projects. We use the term ‘postgraduate’ to describe all research higher degree studies and thesis writing.
Everyone can rise above their circumstances and achieve success if they are dedicated to and passionate about what they do. (Nelson Mandela, 17 December 2009)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Teacher Responsive Teaching and Learning Initiatives Through Action Research
Action Research as an Inquiry-Based Teaching Practice Model for Teacher Education Programs
Utilizing Action Research for Learning Process Skills and Mindsets
Altrichter, H., Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1991). Defining, confining or refining action research? In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.) Action research for change and development (pp. 3–9). Aldershot (UK): Gower Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2001). Conclusion: Broadening the bandwidth of validity: Issues and choice-points for improving the quality of action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds) Handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (pp. 447–455). London: Sage.
Brause, R. (1999). Writing your doctoral dissertation . London: Routledge Falmer.
Brown, R. (1994). The ‘big picture’ about managing writing. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds) Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 90–109). London: Kogan Page.
Brown, R. (1998). How to focus your reader with the main message. In L. Conrad & O. Zuber-Skerritt (Eds) Developing as researchers (2nd edn, pp. 11–24). Brisbane: GIHE, Griffith University.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds) (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brydon-Miller, M., & Greenwood, D. (2006). A re-examination of the relationship between action research and human subjects review processes. Action Research , 4(1), 117–128.
Article Google Scholar
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research . London: Falmer Press.
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2005). Doing action research in your own organisation (2nd edn). London: Sage Publications.
Conrad, L., Perry, C., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Alternatives to traditional postgraduate supervision in the social sciences. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.) Starting research: Supervision and training . Brisbane: TEDI, University of Queensland.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds) (2011). Handbook of qualitative research (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dick, B. (1993). You want to do an action research thesis? How to conduct and report action research. Retrieved from www.aral.com.au /resources/arthesis.html.
Dick, B. (2005). Making process accessible: Robust processes for learning, change and action research. DLitt thesis, Buckingham, UK: IMCA. Retrieved from www.aral.com.au /DLitt/index.html).
Dick, B. (2012). Action learning: Using teams to build leadership and resilience. Retrieved from www.aral.com.au /resources/actionlearning.pdf.
Dotlich, D. L., & Noel, J. L. (1998). Action learning: How the world’s top companies are re-creating their leaders and themselves . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Eikeland, O. (2006). Condescending ethics and action research. Action Research , 4(1), 37–47.
Fletcher, M.A. (2005a). Knowledge management for new times with new technologies to promote new learning: a futures approach to self-managed learning. In Proceedings from the Eighth IASTED International Conference on Computers And Advanced Technology In Education (CATE 2005) August 29–31, Oranjestad, Aruba.
Fletcher, M. (2005b). Action learning/action research: A teacher-centred approach for self-improving schools. Literacy Learning: Middle Years , 13, 16–24.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th edn). London: Sage Publications.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd edn). New York: Longman.
Gottlieb, N. (1994). Supervising the writing of a thesis. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds) Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 110–119). London: Kogan Page.
Herr, K. G., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty . New York: Sage Publications.
Holliday, A. (2002). Doing and writing qualitative research . London: Sage Publications.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research . Dordrecht: Springer.
Book Google Scholar
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development . New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers . New York: Harper and Row.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th edn). London: Sage.
McNiff, J. (Ed.). (2013). Action research: Principles and practice (3rd edn). London: Routledge.
Passfield, R. (1996). Action learning for professional and organisational development: An action research case study in higher education, PhD thesis, Brisbane: Griffith University.
Passfield, R. (1997). Managing the energy of thesis writing: A Chakra perspective. ALAR Journal , 2(2), 19–39.
Phillips, E. M. (1996). The quality of a good thesis. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.) Frameworks for postgraduate education (pp. 197–212). Lismore, NSW, Australia: Southern Cross University Press.
Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (2000). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (3rd edn). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Reason, P., & Marshall, J. (2001). On working with graduate research students. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (pp. 413–419). London: Sage.
Ryan, Y., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Eds) (1999). Supervising postgraduates from non-English speaking backgrounds . Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action . London: Temple Smith.
Sheehan, P. (1994). From thesis writing to research application: Learning the research culture. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds) Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 14–23). London: Kogan Page.
Sillitoe, J., & Crosling, G. (1999). Thesis planning and writing: a structured approach. In Y. Ryan & O. Zuber-Skerritt (Eds) Supervising postgraduates from non-English speaking backgrounds (pp. 167–174). Buckingham, UK: Society of Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Whittle, J. (1992). Research culture, supervision practices and postgraduate performance. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.) Starting research: Supervision and training (pp. 86–107). Brisbane: TEDI, University of Queensland.
Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor (2nd edn). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wood, L., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2013). PALAR as a methodology for community engagement by faculties of education. South African Journal of Education , 33(4), 1–15.
Zeni, J. (Ed.) (2001). Ethical issues in practitioner research . New York: Teachers College Press.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.) (1996). Frameworks for postgraduate education . Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2001). Action learning and action research: Paradigm, praxis and programs. In S. Sankaran, B. Dick, R. Passfield & P. Swepson (Eds) Effective change management using action research and action learning: Concepts, frameworks, processes and applications (pp. 1–20). Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University Press.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2005). A model of values and actions for personal knowledge management. Journal of Workplace Learning , 17(1/2), 49–64.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2011). Action leadership: Towards a participatory paradigm . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer International.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2014). Supervising action research theses and dissertations. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds) Encyclopedia of action research 738–741. London: Sage.
Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Fletcher, M. (2007). The quality of an action research thesis. Quality Assurance in Education , 15(4), 413–436.
Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Perry, C. (2002). Action research within organisations and university thesis writing. The Learning Organisation , 9(4), 171–179.
Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Ryan, Y. (Eds) (1994). Quality in postgraduate education . London: Kogan Page.
Download references
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Copyright information
© 2015 Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt, Margaret Fletcher and Judith Kearney
About this chapter
Zuber-Skerritt, O., Fletcher, M. (2015). Professional Learning through an Action Research Thesis. In: Professional Learning in Higher Education and Communities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455185_8
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455185_8
Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN : 978-1-349-49809-3
Online ISBN : 978-1-137-45518-5
eBook Packages : Palgrave Education Collection Education (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
COMMENTS
What is action research and what are the implications of deciding to use action research as your methodology? (i.e., what kind of study are you going to propose for your dissertation and how it will differ from more traditional dissertation studies?) .
The aim of this research is to reveal how in-class communication and interaction in social studies teaching can be improved with the communicative approach training provided for teachers. Our research questions are as follows.
Participatory action research combines theory and practice, action and reflection with the participation of stakeholders who seek practical solutions to concerns and issues, allowing the flourishing of those stakeholders and their communities as a result of the research process (Reason & Bradbury).
This study aims to determine the degree of public school teachers’ skills regarding action research. The study sample included public school teachers from the Kalamazoo metropolitan area, US (n=20), and Tabuk, Saudi Arabia (n=30).
Teacher education programs need to foster opportunities for candidates to engage in action research. Furthermore, teacher educators themselves should engage in self-study to explore how they are fostering candidates’ reflective and decision-making skills and how teachers’ knowledge is transferred.
Paper two describes action research with seven school staff in a high school in the North of England. This paper explores co-researcher experiences of participating in action research using cooperative inquiry, in a project focused around improving primary to high school transition practice. Four inquiry cycles were followed by
The purpose of this action research study was to understand the impact of implementing a social-emotional learning (SEL) curriculum on a middle school pupil’s academic and behavior performance from the perspective of a teacher.
Action research is a research method that aims to simultaneously investigate and solve an issue. In other words, as its name suggests, action research conducts research and takes action at the same time.
Education. 2011. Aims: In this article, the purpose is to consider the implementation of action research among primary school children and its manifold nature as a research approach by using an action research… Expand.
action research thesis as we revision the postgraduate experience within a professional learning community, drawing on our affective-socio-cognitive model of learning. We present definitions of and checklists for a quality thesis in general, and for a quality action research thesis in particular. We also present two conceptual models that ...